Monday 28 April 2014



Many of Google's top managers in Washington have worked for the CIA and other US intelligence agencies.

Jim Young worked as a CIA analyst at the Directorate of Science and Technology, which is involved in MKULTRA mind control programs

Jim Young now works for Google, selling things to the Defence Department.

The revolving door between Google and the Department of Defence.

Karel Donk's Blog

Shannon Sullivan worked for the US intelligence agencies.

She is 'Head of Defense and Intelligence at Google Enterprise.'

Michele R. Weslander Quaid

Michele R. Weslander Quaid has worked for various US intelligence agencies.

She did intelligence work in Iraq and Afghanistan.

She has worked with the USA's director of national intelligence and the Secretary of Defense.

She is one of Google's Chief Technology Officers

Weslander Quaid told Entrepreneur Magazine that a big part of her job at Google entails meeting with intelligence agency directors.

Google has aggressively intensified its campaign to work alongside the intelligence agencies

Ned Ryun (in white Generation Joshua T-shirt) who worked for George W Bush. 

Weslander Quaid helps the Republican Party win elections.

Politico reports that Michele Weslander Quaid is joining the board of directors of Voter Gravity, which works for the Republican party and conservative groups.

Voter Gravity was set up by Ned Ryun, a rightwing 'Christian' and an anti-union activist.

Recently exposed is Google's partnering with Koch think tanks.

Google appears to be part of the Nazi-Zionist-Mafia-Robber-Baron elite.

They invade people's privacy, make money from people's intellectual property and work with the spooks.

Read Pando’s surveillance valley coverage.

Death to bad search results: Elicit fixes website search with some context and a human touch

The ad game is rigged against online publishers, but sovrn thinks it can be the answer

Let’s kill “net neutrality”

The FCC is about to kill the free Internet

Labels: , , , , , , ,


At 28 April 2014 at 01:28 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

So tells us why you persist in aiding their spying by using Google links instead of direct links.

You must have a good reason so what is it?

At 28 April 2014 at 01:34 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Color Revolutions. Getting Our Facts Straight on the “Arab Spring”

At 28 April 2014 at 06:12 , Anonymous neil melling said...

There is nothing in this world that you and i could say online that in the slightest way bothered the elite. Everything has been said and no change and they know this!

At 28 April 2014 at 07:49 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

if you want to expose all the Koch Bros and bunch please do the same w Geo Soros underneath. They are all the NWO Elites

At 28 April 2014 at 09:35 , Blogger James R said...

In March the Guardian posted this article, about the fact that Channel 4 were about to show NASA footage from space of the September 11th attacks. Many comments on the article alluded to the fact that it was a false flag attack. I made a comment that was simply a list of films about September 11th that I suggest people watch. My comment received two responses from other readers, one positive and another negative. I noticed that there were 310 comments on thwe article and I saved the page.
I returned to the article the following day and was surprised to discover that my comment and the responses to it had completely disappeared, along with at least 100 others, as a day later there were now only 210 comments.
It is common for the Guardian to remove comments they don't like, but this was something completely different. Usually when a comment is removed, the author's usually appear with the message that "This comment has been removed because it breaches our community standards etc". These comments had all been completely removed, no trace of their existence or removal remained. (Funnily enough they left a comment endorsing Loose Change untouched).
This was a pretty obscure article at the Guardian, most people don't even bother with reading the comments, it would make no obvious difference if they were left, yet they weren't.
Someone appears to be deeply concerned about the fact that these are no longer fringe views expressed solely by "nutters" as this Gawker article exemplifies.
The illusion that the views of isolated individuals do not matter is an understandable one, it is however completely incorrect. Every time an individual awakens to the realities of the Deep state and it's criminality, that is a small but devastating blow to the Establishment and their New World Order project. The reason for this is that the project depends almost entirely on it's ability to impose their illusion on almost all. Without the ability to tell big lies successfully their whole project is stuck. The failure to achieve the bombardment of Syria was a tangible sign that the tactics that worked seamlessly for so long no longer work.

At 28 April 2014 at 10:03 , Blogger Unknown said...

exactly so neil melling - we know where you live! (joke) but of course you're right - it makes me laugh that people persist with hiding behind 'anonymous' or using an alias!

At 28 April 2014 at 11:10 , Blogger shirlz007 said...

can any tech savvy person recommend a safer, more reliable, uncensored search engine?

At 28 April 2014 at 18:00 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thanks, Aang

Hey Mr X- coffee's on us on the Waterfront when we're back :-)


At 29 April 2014 at 12:56 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

I've heard "IxquickMetasearch" is a possible.

At 7 July 2014 at 23:42 , Anonymous Anonymous said...


Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home