Saturday, 1 October 2016



The turnout in the recent election in Russia was 47%.

Russia - record low turnout .

A lot of Russians wanted to send a signal that they do not like any of the candidates.

Will voters in the USA send a signal that they do not like either Clinton or Trump?

Does violence work for Trump?

22 September 2016 - Trump 44%, Clinton 39%.

Trump spent Christmas Eve with George Soros in 2009, according to the New York Post.

Is Soros Jewish?

The USA  has a long history of racism and violence.

Does Racism work for Trump?

At the time of Nixon, it was said that "Race is the dominant issue without any question."

Ronald Reagan in 1980 kicked off his campaign at a site used as a meeting place by the KKK.

In January 1993, Bill Clinton left New Hampshire prior to the primary vote to return to Arkansas to preside over the execution of Rickey Ray Rector, a black man.

Racism and Presidential Elections Since 1964: A Short History.


  1. Voter turnout was 47% in Russia but only 28% in Moscow.
    So Putin gets to rule with only a quarter of Russians supporting him........sounds like America to me.

    Of course any mention that Putin is just like our leaders, an NWO stooge selling out his people, is met with censorship and attacks on so many so called alternative news sites.
    Putin has had over a dozen visits with his good friend and mentor Henry Kissinger, but nobody talks about that.
    Putin is dancing with the Americans in a massive fraud in Syria pretending to stand up for the Syrian people.......same as he did in Libya. Tragic that so many fall for this big lie.

    1. That is indeed a very important issue ... What kind of man Vladimir Putin really is ... tho of course the US-Nato anti-Russian propaganda is nearly all nonsense

      Israel Shamir - a Russian-Jewish convert to Christianity who lives in both Moscow and Haifa, Israel - has grown increasingly critical of Putin, his articles are found most easily on the Ron Unz 'Unz Review' website

      Shamir says re Putin & Russia:

      - Most people in Russia are either more Russian-nationalist or more Communist-Socialist than Putin (few Russians are pro-'Western') ... so Putin is somewhat more 'moderate' than any politicians Russians would actually prefer

      - Most people in Russia want more social welfare etc but Putin & his oligarch chums oppose this, though Putin has allowed for increasing middle class prosperity versus what Russians suffered in the 1990s under Yeltsin & Western-tied mafias

      - Putin is not a 'democrat' but is rather anti-democratic as the way to suppress populist desires for more socialism, & for more forceful protection for Russian-speakers in East Ukraine

      - People in Russia don't care to vote because they believe there is significant likelihood vote-counting is rigged, & Shamir believes this may have some truth

      - Russia has wide 'freedom of speech' in the sense of internet posting - which the Kremlin sees as a powerless 'safety valve to let off steam' - but street demonstrations or other strong political actions are very roughly suppressed

      - Putin is very Jewish-Zionist, tied to Mossad-Chabad as well as Netanyahu, Jewish oligarchs etc ... Putin has been rough with a few very aggressive Jewish oligarchs but has a 'deal' with many of the others

      Another question here is whether Putin is really 'opposing' Nato & the West ... or is he merely a 'conflict partner' that plays a role to keep conflicts endlessly burning on either low or high heat (Libya, Ukraine, Syria etc.)

      It is said even the old 'Cold War' was fake, the US oligarchs were always transferring technology and bribes to the old Soviets - often through Israel - to create 'The Best Enemy Money Could Buy' (book by UK-born economist Antony Sutton, who discovered the US-Soviet tech transfers half a century ago)

  2. That act of Bill Clinton putting to death a black man, Ricky Ray Rector, was a particularly horrifying event

    [correct date of the lethal injection killing is 24 January 1992, when Clinton was starting to run for President]

    Clinton killed the man in order to win the 1992 election with Clinton posing as 'tough on crime' and appealing to USA blood-lusting pro-death-penalty voters

    But a particularly disturbing fact, is that Ricky Rector had been wounded in the brain, the convict was mentally a child, he did not even understand he was being put to death ... which means that Clinton's order to kill Rector was a major human rights crime by nearly every standard around the world

    Rector did not eat the pecan pie dessert of his last meal, telling the jailer "I'll come back and eat it after my lethal injection is over."

    The thorough but disturbing hour-long documentary on this, 'The Killer and the Candidate', seems to have been fairly comprehensively suppressed except for the title being mentioned on IMDB (Internet Movie DataBase)