Sunday 4 November 2018


David Rose of MI5 or Mossad?

In the Mail on Sunday, David Rose writes that Leon Brittan is innocent.

  • Lord Leon Brittan was accused of child sexual abuse 
  • Mark Williams-Thomas publicised the names of high profile child abuse suspects
  • He was the source of up to 20 suspects’ names submitted to Operation Yewtree
  • "It created the presumption of guilt and 'ruined innocent lives’"?

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


At 5 November 2018 at 00:47 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Say Daily Fail and flush the water!

At 5 November 2018 at 02:05 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

At 5 November 2018 at 04:28 , Blogger Kaivey said...

That panel on elite child sex slaves, they also did one on how government works as well. The panel said how the elites run the government, but a lot of highly qualified middle class people get involved in the middle government, the bureaucracy. and impose lots regulations on the elite's companies which they hate. So they are always trying to make the government small.

Does anyone know about it and has a link for it. It was very interesting? Thanks!

At 5 November 2018 at 11:47 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Remember that the reason Paul Gambaccini was originally falsely accused, along with other minor celebs, was in a desperate attempt to divert attention from real paedophiles like Brittan and McAlpine within the establishment. Interesting scumbag spook Rose is back to tell more lies to the public. 'Protesting too much' comes to mind.

At 5 November 2018 at 14:13 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Rose" is usually a crypto Jewish surname....
Infact Robert Fisk has a Rose in his background....The appearance of Fisks ex wife Lara Marlowe suggests that 'im and his ex were a high powered crypto couple....they have since separated.
Jewish Power reaches into every crevice.Notably Fisk is remarkably reticent on the subject of Jewish Power and influence AND how it works within Western governments....for example the OBVIOUS control of the financial system.....he has made slight criticism of the 9/11 story....but this could be termed a "limited hangout"...which,since he lives in Beirut,might be useful for retaining credibility amongst the locals.
All his various background stuff suggests he is quite possibly closely connected to MI5 or 6.
The best way to control your opposition is to run it....
Best of all the Jewish staged 9/11 attack can be kept secret.....The occasional concessions (about anomalies) by people like Fisk reinforces the idea that Fisk is a credible "witness" .....
The fate of the former Times correspondent...The one who wrote the book "The Controversy of Zion" is what happens to REAL journalists in Britain.He was sent to Coventry but not on a reporting assignment.

At 5 November 2018 at 22:26 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Rosie Waterhouse is a Ritual Abuse coverer upperer & is mentioned in the RAINS list!

At 5 November 2018 at 23:54 , Blogger Kaivey said...

I posted it to you and you put it out here, Aang, a couple years ago.

At 6 November 2018 at 00:15 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

The tale of Mr Hari and Dr Rose

"Yesterday, Hari provided an apology in respect of a range of journalistic failings, and in this he has admitted to having been "David Rose" all along."

Johann Hari

"Wikipedia editing
In mid-2011, Hari was revealed to have made anonymous pejorative edits to the Wikipedia pages of journalists who had criticised his conduct[31][32][33] after Nick Cohen raised concerns in The Spectator.[34] He wrote that he had been attacked on Wikipedia by an editor named "David Rose" (which was later identified as one of Hari's pseudonyms)[35][better source needed] following a dispute with Johann Hari, and the same editor had made similar changes to the Wikipedia pages of Telegraph columnist Cristina Odone,[36] and Oliver Kamm, a leader writer for The Times[37] after they had been critical of Hari. Cohen also wrote that Hari's own Wikipedia entry had been edited by Rose "to make him seem one of the essential writers of our times".[34] After "David Rose" was later shown to be a pseudonym of Johann Hari,[38] Hari made a public apology for his behaviour.[39] This apology was criticised on a blog on the website of The Economist for being insincere.[40]"


Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home