Friday 2 June 2017


The following is fiction.

I am having lunch with Henry Kissinger, at the Westfields Marriott hotel, in Chantilly in Virginia.

Henry is here for the June 2017 meeting of Bilderberg.

We order Shrimp Cocktail with Voodoo Sauce, Angus beef with Kale Salad, Pear Crumble, and a bottle of Jordan Alexander Valley Cabernet Sauvignon.

I ask Henry what he thinks of Donald Trump.

"Well, he is a German Jew, like myself," explains Henry. "He and I used to enjoy Roy Cohn's parties."

I ask Henry what he thinks about the German Nazis.

"I worked with the American intelligence people who brought a lot of German Nazis over to the USA at the end of World War II," says Henry. "We should  not think of all the Nazi ideas as being bad."

Henry Kissinger with Fritz Kraemer. In 1944 Kraemer discovered the young Henry Kissinger who joined his division in the US military. Kraemer may or may not have had links to Hitler. ASCII text.

When Henry has finished his prawns, I raise the subject of Bilderberg.

"You know," says Henry, "that the creator and chairman of  Bilderberg was Prince Bernhard of the Netherlandswho was a card carrying member of Hitler's SS."

So, who controls Bilderberg?

"Bilderberg," says Henry, "can be seen as being made up of assets of the CIA."

And who controls the CIA?

"Well," says Henry, "you need to understand that at the top of the pyramid of power you have a mixture of people - let's call them the Kosher Nostra - and they may find it useful to work with the KGB, the Islamist militias, the CIA, various Mafias, and so on."

Henry Kissinger served as a top aid to Rockefeller, and reportedly played a major role in covering up Rockefeller's links to Hitler's Nazis.

What does Henry mean by the 'Kosher Nostra'?

"You can't expect me to mention Rockefeller," says Henry grinning. "Or Rothschild, Loeb WarburgSchiff and those other GERMANS WHO RULE THE WORLD."

Victor Louis

I remind Henry about Victor Louis, a top KGB agent.

"Yes," says Henry, "Victor was one of my contacts."

Reportedly, Victor Louis knew in advance about the Kennedy assassination.

Kissinger and wife. Colonel General Michael Goleniewski, a Polish Army intelligence officer in World War II, identified Henry Kissinger as having worked for a Soviet intelligence network in Germany during World War II.

As Henry chews his beef, I remind him about recent events in Manchester.

What was the purpose of the Manchester Arena attack?

"It weakens the UK," explains Henry. "Just think of all those companies like BP which are waiting to be taken over."

Kissinger has been accused of being a gay child abuser. At 4.52 minutes.

Henry finishes his beef and attacks the pear Crumble.

Does Henry worry about being called a war criminal?

"It is survival of the fittest," advises Henry.

What about Leo Strauss, the gay, German, Jewish fascist?

Henry explains that "Strauss believed that those who are fit to rule are those who realize there is no morality.

"And that there is only one natural right - the right of the superior to rule over the inferior.

"Strauss believed that rulers need to go in for perpetual deception.

"Trump understands that."


But here it is: word is, for many years, Melania's been having an affair with the head of security at Tiffany's in the Trump Tower lobby.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,


At 2 June 2017 at 19:08 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

I was there!
Shrimp Cocktail with Voodoo Sauce had mix with my brains and provoke an altered state of conciousness on me as a consequence. The Jordan Alexander Valley Cabernet Sauvignon was the perfect choice.
I was a NAZI and now I work in the European Union as an adviser for strategic purposes. Life it is like candy full of multi flavours and colours.
No drama.
Soon European civil war erupts between religions and other oposites.
I love kokaine!
I love Kate Moss!
I love black girls!
Love you Aanirfan!

At 2 June 2017 at 21:44 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Below is an interesting viewer response to last night's 'Question Time' leaders' debate between Jeremy Corbyn and Theresa May. It's an online comment left by a viewer who perceives Theresa May's political language as imbued with overtones of sexual cruelty.

Does the reader have a point? Read the comment and judge for yourself:

"The British electorate has a sado-masochist relationship with its political parties.

Tories are sadistic, and so the public becomes masochistic in its response to them.

Labour want to help, which is seen as weak, and so the public's sadistic side comes out.

A lot of it is about anger, aggression, power, and its gendered, and sexualised in a perverted way too.

May says she's got balls.

Thatcher's enemies were 'wets'.

Are you male and aggressive, or female and to be penetrated? That's the dichotomy, and approach that Britain takes into the world.

In Brexit, we can't treat the other European counties, our neighbours, as humans, just as the other side, who must be beaten. If we show weakness, they will victimise us."


Now, Theresa May doesn't just relish talking about "balls": she quite deliberately refers to Corbyn as going "naked" into the negotiating chamber (sexual humiliation). Theresa May's robotic refrain of "strong and stable", moreover, has a clear phallic connotation. I have a big penis and a firm erection!

In terms of Neuro Linguistic Programming, then, Theresa May is communicating that Corbyn has Erectile Dysfunction.

In the same way, May is using NLP to communicate subliminally to voters that Corbyn is a woman (weak; wet; naked), when none but a virile, penetrative man (balls; strong and stable erection) is equipped to rule Britannia. This NLP-inspired language is accompanied by exaggeratedly hypermasculine body language, such as when May stands on stage with her legs very wide apart to signal a large phallus for penetrating/dominating the weak.

As the commenter above notes: woe to the weak, the sick, the marginalised and the minority in a a country run in homage to this ideal of ruling class conquest, rape and domination.

At 3 June 2017 at 06:37 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

..........and the subject of his influence over enigmatic Vlad Putin, with over a dozen personal meetings and constant communication by phone, well that just didn't seem important, or politic?

At 3 June 2017 at 13:29 , Anonymous Brabantian said...

Donald Trump - however 'impure' his motives - did a major world good by undermining the 'climate change' hoaxers

In 2009, there was a leak of thousands of e-mails amongst corrupt PhD scientists, centred in the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia, showing that they manipulated & hid data to fraudulently support the 'man-made global warming' hoax & win more 'climate change' grant funding

In 2017, Dr John Bates blew the whistle on his fellow corrupt PhD scientists at the USA national weather monitoring agency, the NOAA - National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration - who had been manipulating & hiding data to fraudulently support the 'man-made global warming' hoax

The Paris climate change agreement involves a corrupt arrangement to give billions to global banksters such as Goldman Sachs seeking profits from trading in 'carbon credits' subsidised by world taxpayers & consumers

And when banks can make billions, they have vast amounts to bribe global politicians ... especially via post-holding-office 'speaking fees' such as Barack Obama, Tony Blair etc have been receiving ... so global politicians have their own greedy incentive for supporting 'climate change' hoaxing

Donald Trump has struck a blow against all of this fraud by his exiting the corrupt Paris climate change agreement

Is that not a good and great thing Trump has done?


Plus even more importantly, with his slam of 'climate change', Donald Trump has been the unique top world leader, declaring to all that we need not listen to the fake authority of 'PhD experts' ... who may well be corrupted by their funding sources

Donald Trump has been the unique top world leader, declaring to all that the Mainstream Media is 'Fake News' ... in which he is both correct & significantly educating tens of millions of people

Should we perhaps not give Donald Trump his due, regardless of the awful things he has done, even recently?

In Europe these last few days, Trump has told Europe & Nato he is in effect ready to leave them on their own, via Trump's clever insistence European countries must 'pay heavily for Nato' if they wish to keep it ... in other words, there may be no more Nato-related bribery funds for Europe's politicians

This has led to Europe's politicians speaking of reducing tensions with Russia, & speaking of the need to now be responsible for their own fates

Is that not another good thing Trump is doing? Is Trump perhaps doing great good in spite of it all?

Is Trump perhaps a vehicle of other-worldly forces quite beyond himself, in fact a figure not really comprehensible in normal categories, given the degree of both good & evil in which he is involved?


Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home