Wednesday 1 April 2015


Ella Draper says she was 'driven out of the UK under threat of kidnap or worse' 


Police hunt for Ella Draper.

1. "A specialist police child abuse team is investigating Ella Draper, 42, and her partner Abraham Christie..."

Abraham Christie, not hiding. Outside the Royal Courts of Justice on February 17 2015

2. Allegations by Ella Draper about a child sex cult "were brought to the attention of officers in September 2014." 

"Mrs Justice Pauffley was asked to investigate by social services bosses in care proceedings brought by Barnet council after the two children were said to be at the centre of the cult’s abuse."

3. "Draper, who is believed to have fled abroad, is wanted for questioning by police over the false allegations."

4. "Police are also hunting Sabine McNeill, a supporter of Draper, for alleged harassment."

5. "Even after last week's judgment, Draper made another video 'witness statement' on March 21 which she posted online, repeating false claims of 'rape, sodomy, murder and cannibalism' against exonerated individuals."

6. "Met detectives in Camden and Barnet are investigating the alleged harassment of the parents and school pupils.

"In a group email to the parents on March 24, police said of Draper and McNeill: 'Once found, they will be arrested and questioned.'

"The Met's Child Abuse Investigation Team based at Barnet is also investigating Draper and Christie."

(London: Depraved paedophile David Friedlander wanted to have sex with babies and toddler girls - )

Sir Michael Havers. "Present at the parties" were "Keith Joseph, Rhodes Boyson, Dr Alistair Smith and Michael Havers." Tory child abuse whistleblower: 'I supplied underage rent

7. A Scotland Yard spokesman said: 'We would advise members of the public not to forward or share material on the internet that they believe is related to this enquiry.

'No arrests have been made at this time. Enquiries are ongoing.'

8. "Mr Dearman said that his reputation had been 'shattered' and called for tougher penalties against those who harass others online.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.

Scotland Yard investigated over three more VIP child abuse cover-ups taking total to 17 ...AND!...

Rotherham investigation expanded after 42 police named in abuse allegations


Labels: , , , ,


At 27 March 2015 at 06:27 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thanks, Aaang.

New Hampstead Research vid: baby trafficking?

At 27 March 2015 at 06:32 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

There are 2,074 registered children's homes in England, Ofsted records
These homes offer 11,765 places
There are 16 secure children's homes, providing 281 places
Around three quarters of homes are run by private operators
Annual fees per child can total £200,000
There is a high density of children's homes in Margate, Rochdale, Blackpool and Worthing - large properties in these areas tend to be cheap
45% of children in care homes are outside of their home borough
Police figures show an estimated 10,000 children go missing from care every year
Government official data records just 930 children

North West 514
West Midlands 335
South East 268
South West 210
Yorkshire and Humber 186
East Midlands 165
East of England 159
London 130
North East 107
TOTAL 2,074


There's a lot of banning in the 'New and improved' Forum:

At 27 March 2015 at 06:34 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Aang. said:

4. "Police are also hunting Sabine McNeill, a supporter of Draper, for alleged harassment."

Ricky Dearman felt 'harassed' and Policemen act accordingly. That's the system.

The system is wrong, designed to be this way.

At 27 March 2015 at 08:25 , Blogger Charles Edward Frith said...

Spooky fingerprints all over hampstead

At 27 March 2015 at 08:45 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Germanwings Flight Gave Distress Signal Before Crash

At 27 March 2015 at 09:13 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Why Dearman Should Never See His Children Again
Well done
Huge post

At 27 March 2015 at 14:00 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ah the Daily Mail strikes again. This article, "Police Hunting Runaway Mother...", which seems to be an amalgam of earlier Ham & High smear pieces entitled "Innocent Father accused of Satanic child abuse slams harassment laws" and "Police investigations launched into Satanic Hampstead child abuse "fantasy" (notice the capitalization of the word 'Satanic' vs 'child abuse' in these articles), have all the earmark's of professional media hit pieces, I wonder if Ham & High and DailyMail might not have been working together on these. Now, with the inclusion of an undercover agent on the scene named Christine Ann Sanders, the Hampstead Child Abuse Inquiry has indeed become very interesting. What's the term, "Where there's smoke there's usually fire"?

I've been trying to describe this feeling that I am getting over this entire case. It truly does seem that the term egregore is looming it's ugly grey head over this entire debacle. Two children seem to poor their hearts out on camera about some of the abuse they have suffered over a span of several years. Obviously, the mother and her partner KNEW that they could not trust the authorities and the police SOLELY although it was them that initiated correspondence with the police. This is contrary to DailyMail and Ham & High's intentionally misleading and erroneous reporting error number one was the implication that the initial complaint wasn't started by Ella and Abe, when we all know that it was. Question number one would have to be why would Abe and Ella go anywhere near the police if it was indeed them that committed all of the abuse?

Target words are used in most of these articles particularly the word 'torture'. "One to the allegations of harassment and another into the findings that the children had been "tortured" -Ham & High. Another one of those words is 'harassment'. "His name and address (RD) were also published alongside the allegations, leading him to receive "constant harassment" and death threats" -Ham & High "Innocent Father accused...". These articles are rife with these catch phrases. This DIRECTLY contradicts Dame Pauffley's ruling that "torture" would BE A STRONG WORD TO USE but...

...but, we still have no indication, even from revelations from the POI's interviewed by Ham & High, that the police and "Justice" Pauffley are interested in pursuing the requisite charges laid against Mr. Christie for his alleged 'torture' of these children. Each and every aspect of every one of these articles is designed to retract from the real details of this case. Which is why I believe Ella, Abe and Sabine decided to release the childrens recordings to the public so that they could judge for themselves. And that is, indeed, what almost 4 million people DID do.


At 27 March 2015 at 14:00 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yes, we have to respect the rule of law because ultimately, justice WILL prevail, but that process inevitably involves a long stage of drudgery. There is recourse for Justice Pauffley's ruling as many have pointed out. Which IS the point, many professional health care workers and men of law have taken an interest in this case and have had their points made public, making note that Justice Pauffley's ruling to certain social worker's comments that the entire police interview process was flawed from the beginning, you were wrong and THE PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN.

WE ARE NOT SATISFIED WITH THIS JUDGEMENT. And the people must and will call for a continued investigation. It really does not matter what Justice Pauffley's ruling was because she was simply a speed bump in the pursuit of an even greater process of justice, that of the appeal, civil cases and so on. 4 million people have reviewed many materials that can give a logical platform for a possible cause for direction and inquiry, Justice Pauffley's ruling, Ham & High, and the DailyMail, along with the small minority of police officers and social workers, DID NOT FOLLOW THOSE DIRECTIONS, telling 4 million people that they were not only idiots, but pedophiles as well.

Throughout this episode the egregore of denial has loomed so low in the valley that it is like the thick fog that covers Hampstead and all of London in the morning. These people are DEATHLY afraid of criticism, so much so that the formerly accused who so arrogantly believes he is completely exonerated because one single court ruling said so is trying to advocate for stronger internet laws against harassment, when the LAST thing on his mind should be the criticism from people out there in cyberspace. Why is this man so arrogantly concerned with HIS welfare than the welfare of his children? This has been the case throughout this debacle, he has even had the audacity to try and show up on several Youtube videos and social sites defending himself and his position, even joining in on the name calling. His defensive position, as well as the defensive position of almost everyone involved in the 'other side' of this thing has been ominously quiet and sheepish about their role in this thing. "I'm the victim" when two children are shouting out sincere allegations of Ritualistic Sexual Battery, should command some sort of empathy for their cries of justice, but they do not. All we hear are other accusations of blame and guilt, and most of that blame is laid back on these children and her mother. Something doesn't smell right here in Denmark as the saying goes.

"Thou dost protest too much" also comes to mind when I think of Ricky Dearman, Justice Pauffley, Ham & High, DailyMail and those families interviewed for those articles. When does this pompous egregorious air clears itself and blame is laid aside and responsibility takes it's place? When does Ricky Dearman come out and try to clear his name of the allegations that his ex-wife CONTINUES to declare EVEN AFTER she has come to the understanding that she will not see her children until they are 18. There is no point in addressing these concerns if she is not going to have the ability to be with her children in the immediate future, why press on? It would have to be out of something more than sheer spite.


At 27 March 2015 at 14:01 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

To the people of Hampstead, if you have nothing to hide than you should be able to take these calls and harassment in stride taking into consideration what these children have suffered. I am not advocating that anyone commit such irresponsible acts and anyone that IS doing it and reading this should understand that harassment of these people by those means is not going to achieve one positive result in the very least, and it looks disgusting to anyone of sane mind. Proper, reserved and professional investigation is what is warranted here. But back to the point. I agree with you that all those names, addresses and phone numbers were erroneously and callously, irresponsibly posted on the internet, that much is true. Yet, taking into light the magnitude of these allegations, IF you have done nothing wrong, would simply outweigh any criticism and all of it, in time, will simply go away. But your protestations and your arrogance over the entire matter has made things even worse. You have made people even more interested.

Ricky Dearman. You have made yourself available, like any struggling actor, for many PR op's throughout this charade, but you seem to want to make justifications and innuendo instead of wanting to get down to brass tacks. I see that the newspapers and supporting websites like to keep this image of the shiny do gooder hollywood actor falsely accused by a vindictive wife seeking custody of her minor children (how does one think that such harsh allegations are going to get their children awarded to anyone; point being you wouldnt have got with Ella if she was totally dumb so you know that she knew very well herself that this wasn't part of any custody battle, is was an attempt to get powerful help before the shit hit the fan). You have a wonderful opportunity by your local rag the Ham & High to poor your heart out to your adoring fans about all the torture your poor beautiful children have suffered, wondering about how their grades are and if they are getting enough to eat and are warm, wondering if the foster parents are reading them bedtime stories... NO... we are exalted with your great OPINION about being harassed on the internet and how your career has been 'shattered'.

Your 'egregore' Mr. Dearman hovers over you like a cold, transparent wind bag full of hollow personas.


At 27 March 2015 at 14:06 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

At 27 March 2015 at 14:30 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

At 27 March 2015 at 15:10 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ella and Abe 26 th march 15 :

At 27 March 2015 at 15:28 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

THE Needle continues its gatekeeping

At 27 March 2015 at 15:28 , Anonymous Anonymous said...


At 27 March 2015 at 15:36 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Also a pretty interesting development:

CCPS Vid 10: A Hampstead Baby Trafficker?

The strange thing that happened was that we noticed that this woman, who is a Russian woman living in New York was Friends on Facebook with previous Christ Church teacher. But a few minutes later, we returned to the computer and the information had disappeared.

So now I want to ask you to use your imagination. What do you imagine the Facebook page of an Angolan baby trafficker might look like?

First, if you were trafficking babies you would need contacts who had access to very poor women in countries known for trafficking, women so desperately poor that they might be persuaded to sell their babies. Contacts like this lady, perhaps, who runs a training programme using NLP on grassroots young women in India.

And of course Nepal has one of the most serious child and baby trafficking problems in the world.

Then there’s Columbia

And Turkey

And not to forget Brazil

Then you would need contacts at the airports or know people who could fly planes....


At 27 March 2015 at 15:39 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Oh, and even the Hampstead Research Team recognizes the symbology of the purple butterfly.


At 27 March 2015 at 15:48 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

reblogged,the Hollie case writ large in London complete wi its own debunkers

At 27 March 2015 at 15:51 , Anonymous Anonymous said...



The judiciary are labelling parties following the case as evil, foolish and interested in the sexual activity aspect when in fact I would suggest most of us are concerned for what is known as "the public interest" which includes "the administration of justice" or in this case the powers that be going absolutely berserk to ensure injustice prevails - which of course fuels more interest in the case as flagrant abuse of power in the now blatant maladministration of justice!

This happens because our justice system is not only corrupt but administered by individuals who are not that highly intelligent, hence we can easily pick their activities apart. It is the same with any liar; their tissue falls apart under scrutiny.

Most of us have picked up on this huge injustice and seek to follow the case to see what unfolds as the authorities attempt to rescue themselves or as usual dig themselves into an ever deeper hole but on this occasion the world of the web is watching:

At 27 March 2015 at 15:52 , Anonymous Anonymous said...


There are indeed a few divisive individuals who may well be representing the establishment who have obtained names and addresses of suspects and who themselves may be harassing suspects solely to discredit the victims in this case, namely the children.

This has arisen solely because the police have refused to interview those whom the children have repeatedly testified to the police of raping them to the point they gave up, their testimony ignored.

Children in custody over several weeks v Police: Who wins?

The Police and the Judiciary, as we know, are well connected to Freemasonry, a society of Jewish secrets, which has Royalty as its patrons.

I would point out that as someone who has considerable experience in this area, I find government bodies habitually do everything they can to incite the public, in the interests of the said establishment, so in this case we need to stand most firmly against those who threaten suspects as playing into the hands of the establishment:

The facts of the case will be sufficient - no need to scream and shout.

The victims were originally (A and G now) P and Q (the children) but now include also Ella their mother, Abe her partner and Ella's lay legal advisor Sabine McNeil who gives of herself solely to provide support to individuals who find themselves victimised by the state. Sabine McNeil has only the victims at heart and as the lay support to said victims is innocent of any charge laid against her for providing said support to ensure the safety and well-being of the children.
It is understood Sabine and probably Ella and Abe have fled the UK requiring the safe keeping of a foreign country as the legal case unfolds.

We can at the very least be satisfied the victimisation of Sabine is unlawful whereby the state seeks to make her a political prisoner. Likewise there is no evidence to hold Ella and Abe as having, in any way, acted illegally in this case.

Sabine and the mother Ella (with partner Abe) must be granted immunity in order to pursue the ongoing legal action concerning the repatriation of the children to their mother and permitted to participate in the necessary access proceedings from the safety of a foreign country for I would warn both that if they were granted immunity to do so, in the UK, once proceedings were over they would very likely be arrested under separate proceedings for having challenged the state.

It is becoming obvious that they need to do so as the UK is controlled by persons who desire to legalise child rape and child sacrifice as part of a satanic New World Order.

This has been coming to light most so in the case of serial child rapist Jimmy Savile who had the highest connections including Prime Ministers and the Royal Family.

We can also see the foundations being laid by Harriet Harrman not only Deputy Prime Minister but among other things Shadow Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport as though we needed a government minister responsible for the independent media which we now know is not independent but mostly Jewish controlled - as they say cui bono.

More to follow.

At 27 March 2015 at 17:08 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

So "Hampstead is a hoax" propaganda is being posted here too now? Hmm.
It's interesting that these people have such rigorous standards applied to the mother, stepfather and McNeil but RD, the police, the media and the judge all get a free pass.

At 27 March 2015 at 19:59 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

the reason police have never been allowed to have a missing persons database, which would mean all police forces are notified of any missing children, is because of the massive scale of this, a writer on the occult, and accused by many of being an unstable crackpot ellis c taylor claims many of these kids are used in jewish blood drinking rituals, does anyone know anything about this ?

At 27 March 2015 at 20:47 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Abe is speaking weird in the latest videos... Ella seems mind controlled.

Why does Abe refer to Ella as crazy in one of the videos, they then kiss (audible) and Ella laughs a little and says something along the lines of "people will wonder what you mean" - is she being handled? Was Abe introduced to help remove the children? I have no idea.

Has it been noted Abe owned a property which was number 5 of a certain street and an alleged abuser was number 7.

Araya Soma had stated on her FB that UK Column were responsible for informing SS regarding children. Is this still her position?

It is said (by Araya) she knew Abe because of his previous relationship, where she regarded him as controlling. So their history goes back to before Ella was involved with him?

Is Ella under mind control? Is Abe a handler? Is Araya planted after her attempt at discrediting Kevin Annett? Is Ontario connected to all this in some way? Perhaps by way of a psychotherapist and fan of the trustee "art" Who worked there at the notorious schools?

Is Bellinda MI5 and has Sabine been taken in unwittingly? Her EU video, she seems to speak from the heart... I believe her words.

The two stories covered up by Paul Joseph Watson have been Woolwich and Hampstead. For what reason?

Why has it taken UKColumn so much time to discuss this story? Did they expect it to go away? They were apparently speaking to Ella back in Sept... Why is Araya implicating them as being bad? Why does Araya think they moon is a fake alien craft.

Does Araya act loopy like Christine Sands? Same MO?

Why why why.

No proper investigation into claims. That's a fact...

Are we taking a look at a system which has been hidden for a long time and is the mechanism of generational recruitment, to propagate evil?

All the wars, they seem very sacrificial to me.

I am sick of all this horror in the world. Let's do something today which will change everything. Let's do something good. Let's break the chain.

With love and a beautiful equation.

At 27 March 2015 at 21:02 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Has Bill Maloney commented on the Hampstead case?

"Leon Britton was identified by a tattoo on his groin area"

Doesn't really strike me as a tattoo type of person, what would be the purpose of this tattoo. Is it a cult thing?

Oh wait, Hampstead, hmm.

At 28 March 2015 at 15:37 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

New Hampstead Research vid:

At 28 March 2015 at 16:34 , Blogger Greg Pearson said...

Indeed, some form of violence from a "conspiracist" toward an "harassed falsely-accused innocent" would be all they need to shut down all public discussion of any child abuse forever-so it is probably "on the table", as they say- just curious- wasn't an entire neighborhood or town, at least the male inhabitants thereof, essentially forced to give blood/dna evidence to slove a series of murders back in the 70's/80's? And do the uk courts allow lie detector tests?

At 28 March 2015 at 17:23 , Blogger Greg Pearson said...

for your consideration-
and some ancillary info denoting occult practices, of which blood sacrifice is always the highest form;
and just for kicks, the first profile...

At 28 March 2015 at 18:41 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

"if you have nothing to hide than you should be able to take these calls and harassment in stride"

If you have nothing to hide then you have nothing to fear - is the same argument the government uses to justify mass surveillance. You're a fascist, you just don't realise it.

At 29 March 2015 at 15:30 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

At 29 March 2015 at 16:21 , Blogger Greg Pearson said...

To Anon above,as the reply option seems disabled-
1. If you read my suggested articles, you'll see most of them are written by jews
2. I have known jews all my life, that's why I believe almost all of what I read here
3. Wouldn't the "kosher" scam is perfect cover for the blood passover?- which involves not drinking blood but consuming it dried in the matzoh, drawn from a Christian boy of no more than 7 years old after "desecration of the host"- but the main function of the kosher industry is to impose a universal tax on the goyim, collected by rabbis, who among other things force food producers to pay them for certifying the kosher status of food- these producers then pass that cost on to the consumers and of course kosher/hallal slaughter is considered animal cruelty by most cultures- worse by far than the standard slaughterhouse- religiously justified
4. Jews aren't the only people who have a history of blood consumption but their history is extensive and has been cited as the reason for at least some of the many expulsions over the centuries
5. Of the many jews I have known, some have been decent and I have been proud to call them friends- but the vast majority have been, well, stereotypical- and I believe these sterotypical attributes are genetic- no way to ameliorate them. The only jews I wish to meet henceforth are those who; denounce the Talmud as satanic and blasphemous; denounce usury as a crime against humanity; recognise the holocaust was a hoax in many ways; proclaim bolshevism as a jewish plot which murdered 60 million people; recognise the holomodor; decry all crypto-jew influence in non-jewish institutions such as the catholic church, jesuits, communist china, governments around the world, IMF, world bank, etc; call for the removal of all dual-citizens from the US gov't including Congress, FDA, State Dept, NED, etc; actively persecute traditional jewish occupations such as organ trafficking, pornography, slave trade, human trafficking, drug trade, pedophilia, organised crime, etc., etc.,
6. Recognises "The Protocols of the Elders of ZION" as a factual document
7. Actively works to build gentile culture rather than destroy it
and that's just for starters- after seeing what Israel did to the Palestinians last year, who wouldn't believe they would engage in blood passover?

At 30 March 2015 at 09:14 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well I suppose you would be right about that in a larger sense but I believe you are exaggerating my point to destroy my entire argument and make me look like a fool. I would never advocate the entire absolution of the rule of law when I stated this. I'm not advocating mass surveillance or a violation of these peoples right to privacy but the fact of the matter is is that there ARE going to be those idiots that do it, not that it SHOULD be done by your insinuation. I simply stated if they have not done anything wrong than they should not fear and be able to pass those calls off as nothing. Talk about making a mountain out of a molehill.


At 31 March 2015 at 05:28 , Blogger Unknown said...

I'm told that my Interpol Notice has been cancelled. But that doesn't make me feel safe to return at all. The Rule of Evil seems to be alive and well within the Police as well as Prison. I'm gathering evidence from the 'evil' and 'foolish' British and international public re the Pauffley judgement on


Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home