HAMPSTEAD JUDGEMENT
..Haze makes the following points about Judge Pauffley's judgement on the Hampstead child abuse case:
1. Justice Pauffley (above) placed a great deal of emphasis on the conduct of Mr Abraham Christie (mother's boyfriend) and not on the father's record of domestic violence resulting in a separation from his wife and a non-molestation order.
Ricky dearman, the father.
Pauffley refers to Ricky Dearman, the father, as "the father whom they love" while calling Abraham Christie "evil" and accusing him and the mother of torture.
Abraham Christie (left)
Abraham Christie (left)
2. Pauffley did not discuss the film made by the Irish chap, without Abraham C present or any duress, where the girl volunteered more information - including her fears about the "bad police" telling her father that they, the children, had reported the father's crime; and her fears about her father coming to kill them, as he had threatened to do.
3. If the children were coached, what's the point of embellishing the account with details about 'Big Sex Wednesday' or the length of a black dildo which the boy estimated with his hands, sex in a disabled toilet, a girl who moved to another school to become the "star of the show," shoes made from baby skin with a hexagram motif... All very elaborate, if purely for spite.
Jason Swift. In 1985, 14-year-old Jason Swift was killed by a child-abuse gang. Jason is believed to have lived in Islington council's Conewood Street children's home. (Jersey child abuse link to Islington, London). Sidney Cooke, Leslie Bailey, Robert Oliver, and Lennie Smith, were imprisoned in 1989 for the manslaughter of Jason Swift. Cooke and his gang had sexually tortured and prostituted a number of boys. The gang is believed to have killed at least nine children.[2] Cooke was sentenced to 19 years in prison. In 1998, Cooke was let out of prison eight years early. There have been allegations that very powerful people have been involved in a child-abuse ring connected to Islington children's homes.( Jersey child abuse link to Islington, London)
Haze continues:
4. The judge's evidence was centered on Detective Sergeant Fernandez and Detective Constable Martin having a cursory glace around the vestry of Christ Church, including the drawers where the priest’s vestments were stored, searching for material to assist in their inquiries.
Haze continues:
4. The judge's evidence was centered on Detective Sergeant Fernandez and Detective Constable Martin having a cursory glace around the vestry of Christ Church, including the drawers where the priest’s vestments were stored, searching for material to assist in their inquiries.
"They found nothing of interest to the inquiry."
They did not raid an address in Islington where the children alleged victims were taken.
Dr. Deborah Hodes, a community pediatrician in the London borough of Camden.
5. The judge dismissed out of hand the evidence of the medical expert (above), whom she calls "over-dogmatic" with a "scientific prejudice" because with no medical background or expertise, Pauffley decided that anal scarring was the result of a "normal varient."
Who would you trust, a doctor who is an authority on child sexual abuse or a woman who is serving the paedophile establishment?
Ella draper, the children's mother.
Ella draper, the children's mother.
6. Dr Hodes said that, 'the current evidence is that prolonged reflex anal dilatation (the finding in P) is associated with anal abuse' and cited the Royal College of Paediatrics 2008 Review.
She stated that both children have physical signs of sexual abuse that support their allegations; they have symptoms of post traumatic stress; and it is her opinion the extensive and detailed accounts given by both children, repeated to different professionals, contain details of sexual acts that such young children would need to have had some sort of direct experience.
The children
7. Pauffley's summary said; 'Neither child has been sexually abused by any of the following – Ricky Dearman, teachers at Christchurch Primary School Hampstead, the parents of students at that school, the priest at the adjacent church, teachers at any of the Hampstead or Highgate schools, members of the Metropolitan Police, social workers employed by the London Borough of Camden, officers of Cafcass oranyone else mentioned by Ms Draper or Mr Christie.'
8. But it has been admitted that Scotland Yard has been covering up sadistic and satanic, serial child sex abuse and murders for the greater part of the 20th Century.
The children
7. Pauffley's summary said; 'Neither child has been sexually abused by any of the following – Ricky Dearman, teachers at Christchurch Primary School Hampstead, the parents of students at that school, the priest at the adjacent church, teachers at any of the Hampstead or Highgate schools, members of the Metropolitan Police, social workers employed by the London Borough of Camden, officers of Cafcass oranyone else mentioned by Ms Draper or Mr Christie.'
8. But it has been admitted that Scotland Yard has been covering up sadistic and satanic, serial child sex abuse and murders for the greater part of the 20th Century.
What makes you think they are going to stop now?
Theresa May says it is endemic in society and worse than we can imagine, in our youth clubs, churches and schools... except for Hampstead, where the children claimed they were subjected to multiple rape and infant sacrifice in a cult led by their father.
Video: Ella and Abe speaking about Pauffley and the Hampstead WhistleblowerKids..
Abraham tells us Judge Pauffley is "Israeli"
James writes:
"While making frank claims against the mother's partner, both children independently expressed the fear that their father would kill them.
"One was scared; one had nightmares about it.
"Two different experiences that speak the same truth.
"They cannot win on this because they are trying to say they are totally coached, completely coerced yet they are making several (in my opinion minor) claims against the mother's partner.
"The poor judge is asking us to believe that the children were utterly under the spell of Abraham etc yet why did that spell not extend to getting them to shut up about about the troubles in Morocco. You cannot be serious, it makes no sense. It is impossible."
Judge Pauffley made her judgement with - "no attendance of those she is now trying to scapegoat, nor attendance of the children, and with no independent witnesses"
Sabine writes:
SatanicJudicialAbuse - Pauffley Judgement
"Her Ladyship's judgement is one of a political nature to sway public opinion such that she will get away with handing custody to the father with a criminal past and two non-molestation orders, while the mother had a residence order in place, when Barnet Police took her children.
"If Mr Christie was the guilty abuser, why did he take the children to the Police?"
James writes:
"While making frank claims against the mother's partner, both children independently expressed the fear that their father would kill them.
"One was scared; one had nightmares about it.
"Two different experiences that speak the same truth.
"They cannot win on this because they are trying to say they are totally coached, completely coerced yet they are making several (in my opinion minor) claims against the mother's partner.
"The poor judge is asking us to believe that the children were utterly under the spell of Abraham etc yet why did that spell not extend to getting them to shut up about about the troubles in Morocco. You cannot be serious, it makes no sense. It is impossible."
Judge Pauffley made her judgement with - "no attendance of those she is now trying to scapegoat, nor attendance of the children, and with no independent witnesses"
Sabine writes:
SatanicJudicialAbuse - Pauffley Judgement
"Her Ladyship's judgement is one of a political nature to sway public opinion such that she will get away with handing custody to the father with a criminal past and two non-molestation orders, while the mother had a residence order in place, when Barnet Police took her children.
"If Mr Christie was the guilty abuser, why did he take the children to the Police?"
Some people think that Judge Pauffley's ruling on the Hampstead incident is somewhat biased.
AkhaldanSolo writes:
"This 'judge' squarely rested ALL blame on the Mother and her partner AC, as well as the entire 'online community' that followed the matter in it's entirety...
"Ms. Pauffley's ruling looks to be similar to the rants provided by ... 'Ricky Dearman'...
"Not a single mention of RD domestic abuse issues and logged police complaints against him.
"Not one mention of the First Degree Sodomy charges Mr. Christie would be facing if he were guilty of the anal scarring in Victim P.
"Not a single mention of police misconduct in trying to apprehend the mother illegally.
"No mention of how the police videos left the possession of the police, no mention of the validity of the retractions and the ominous police approach to these retractions, nay their whole approach to this entire investigation.
"This off-the-cuff ruling from justice Pauffley seems more a poor attempt at quelling public dissent than protecting any children from abuse."
..
Anonymous writes:
"So another four million people concerned about child abuse go on the 'authorities' list of suspected paedophiles? No tactic will be too low or devious for an Establishment feeling under siege."
Anonymous writes:
To Parents Who Have Had Children Removed By The State: Were ‘Psychiatrists’ Claire Sturge or Danya Glaser, or ‘psychotherapists’ Dr Judith Freedman and/or Mr John Lawrence Involved In Your Case?.
"If she hadn't acquitted the father so quickly I might have thought she was making an effort to give a truthful verdict, but because she immediately condemned the mother and the mother's partner, who uploaded the videos in the first place. My question is why would they upload that if they were the perpetrators?"
"Well what do you know... Look who was involved in Hollie Greig case... Anna Paullfrey no less."
Press Release and summary of events at RCJ 2nd March2012
Corey Haim 1971-2010. "What I am uncovering is that sexual exploitation of children is happening all over the country," Sue Berelowitz, deputy children's commissioner for England, told MPs in June. She quoted a police officer who had told her: "There isn't a town, village or hamlet in which children are not being sexually exploited." She told of girls as young as 11 "summoned" via BlackBerry Messenger, and forced to perform oral sex on a line-up of gang members, one after another..."Amazing how she can come to all these conclusions with out the slightest wiff of investigation into most of her claims and of course contrary to all the evidence - such it seems is our evil judiciary which refuses to consider the cries of the children whom the medical profession have clearly shown were subject to the abuse they have testified to.
"According to the judge it would appear AC and the mother are responsible for the findings of the medical experts with regard to the rectal examinations which of course is completely inconsistent with the kids testimony.
"And just what medical evidence did she rely upon to come to her conclusions?
"None as far as I can see the medical evidence appears to be ignored.
"Welcome to the United Satanic Kingdom.
"Time for Mum to begin an appeal against the dame's decision."
"The Metropolitan police's sex crime unit, Sapphire, announced a restructuring after a detective admitted 13 counts of misconduct, for failing to investigate 10 rapes and three sexual assault cases. Another Sapphire detective is under investigation for similar offences. Sapphire has already been restructured before, in 2009, after police had failed to stop multiple rapists John Worboys and Kirk Reid." The evil of Jimmy Savile was not his alone - The Guardian
"PAUFFLEY wrote: 'Moreover, senseless assumptions would seem to have been made by Mr Christie and the mother if, in fact, the children had touched the dog and were 'touching each other.'
"'To believe that children who demonstrate curiosity about and touch their own, the dog’s
and their sibling’s genital areas must have, or probably have, been sexually abused is
plainly ridiculous...'
"So this nutty judge thinks it is normal for children to molest each other and dogs - that it's not a sign of abuse ?
"Nowhere in her entire opinion does she mention that the children gave detailed identifying descriptions of the naked bodies and private parts of their abusers - such tattoos etc.
and their sibling’s genital areas must have, or probably have, been sexually abused is
plainly ridiculous...'
"So this nutty judge thinks it is normal for children to molest each other and dogs - that it's not a sign of abuse ?
"Nowhere in her entire opinion does she mention that the children gave detailed identifying descriptions of the naked bodies and private parts of their abusers - such tattoos etc.
"She writes, 'at Mr Christie’s and Ms Draper's instigation, they were able to 'speak to camera' about the stories concocted during the brainstorming. The obvious purpose of the film clips was to provide ‘proof.’ It was part of a deliberate plan by Mr Christie and Ms Draper. The children do as they are told. They do so forthrightly, without inhibition and with apparent conviction.'
"The crazy judge thinks that Mr Christie told the children to fabricate descriptions of tattoos and birth marks as 'proof' - when that would actually DISPROVE the allegations - unless Christie had somehow managed to guess what all the kids teachers looked like naked so as to provide the children with the 'proof'.
"Did anybody examine the bodies of these accused person? She also failed to mention that the children had spoken with their father via Skype prior to their retraction. And she failed to note the suspicious closing of the school and church websites.
"Sad. An outrageously dishonest opinion. The judge needs to be put on a watchlist."
Anonymous writes:
"Paulfry writes, 'Evidence cannot be evaluated and assessed in separate compartments.
"The crazy judge thinks that Mr Christie told the children to fabricate descriptions of tattoos and birth marks as 'proof' - when that would actually DISPROVE the allegations - unless Christie had somehow managed to guess what all the kids teachers looked like naked so as to provide the children with the 'proof'.
"Did anybody examine the bodies of these accused person? She also failed to mention that the children had spoken with their father via Skype prior to their retraction. And she failed to note the suspicious closing of the school and church websites.
"Sad. An outrageously dishonest opinion. The judge needs to be put on a watchlist."
Anonymous writes:
"Paulfry writes, 'Evidence cannot be evaluated and assessed in separate compartments.
"'A judge in these difficult cases must have regard to the relevance of each piece of evidence to
other evidence and to exercise an overview of the totality of the evidence in order to
come to the conclusion whether the case put forward by the local authority has been
made out to the required standard of proof.'
"Wrong.
other evidence and to exercise an overview of the totality of the evidence in order to
come to the conclusion whether the case put forward by the local authority has been
made out to the required standard of proof.'
"Wrong.
"The Judge pretends that deciding facts entails choosing between two 'all or nothing' packages. So rather than weighing each allegation of the children and determining if even one of them is true, she neatly rejects them all."
~~~~~~~~~~~~
...
Judge Pauffley refers to the UK's Cleveland child abuse inquiry.
The 1987 Cleveland child abuse scandal involved 'falsely accused' adults.
The 1987 Cleveland child abuse scandal involved 'falsely accused' adults.
We now know that the majority of the children had been sexually abused and that many were forced to return to the homes they were abused in.
The Butler-Sloss inquiry into the Cleveland case heard evidence from an American 'child abuse expert' called Ralph Underwager.
He spoke out on behalf of the 'falsely accused' adults.
Underwager reportedly works for the CIA.
'COVER-UP MERCHANT' CHOSEN FOR CHILD ABUSE INQUIRY?
The UK government chose Lady Elizabeth Butler-Sloss, aged 80, to chair the inquiry into the handling of child abuse allegations by various UK institutions.
Devon peer to lead huge child abuse probe
2. Elizabeth Butler-Sloss is the daughter of Sir Cecil Havers and is very much part of the Establishment.
3. Until June 2007, she chaired the inquest into the death of Lady Diana, Princess of Wales, and appeared to be part of a cover-up.
Elizabeth Butler-Sloss chaired the Cleveland child abuse inquiry, which some people saw as being part of a cover-up.
5. Lady Butler-Sloss granted life-long anonymity to the killers of toddler James Bulger
6. Lady Butler-Sloss is the sister of the late Sir Michael Havers, who was Lord Chancellor (top legal man) at the time of the Kincora Boys Home child abuse cover-up.5. Lady Butler-Sloss granted life-long anonymity to the killers of toddler James Bulger
Havers reportedly tried to silence 'the child abuse whistleblower' Tory MP Geoffrey Dickens.
I was warned off asking Brittan what he knew.
Havers opposed the prosecution of child abuser Sir Peter Hayman.
Many of Aangirfan's posts on child abuse are being disappeared by Google, and by various forums.
Labels: Abraham Christie, Alisa, Butler-Sloss, Cleveland, cover-up, Ella Draper, Gabriel, Hampstead, Pauffley, Peter Cook, Ricky Dearman, Sabine
posted by Anon @ 22:37
53 Comments
