Tuesday, 23 January 2018


The major ad firm Outfront Media has censored the above 'free Ahed Tamimi' billboard.

A businessperson wanted to pay $5,350 for a billboard calling to free Ahed Tamimi.

The ad firm's Chicago office said yes, but it was overruled by higher ups.

Major ad firm Outfront Media censors "free Ahed Tamimi" billboard.

Ahed Tamimi

The teenage girl Ahed Tamimi was attacked by the Israeli military.

"The slap that was delivered to Ahed Tamimi before she slapped back, is hardly mentioned at all - and  it represents a grand pathology of denial."

Ahed Tamimi was actually slapped first, but it's hardly mentioned

"Just before Palestinian teen Ahed Tamimi slapped one of the soldiers who'd invaded her yard, she learned that her 15-year-old cousin Mohammed had been shot in the head at close range."

The story behind Ahed Tamimi's slap: Her cousin's head shattered by ...


Ahed Tamimi, a 16-year-old girl was arrested by Israeli forces and may spend 10 years in jail for slapping an Israeli soldier in her village.

This is the whole story behind that viral video.


  1. See the clothes that girl was wearing, the Palestinians are hardly the Muslim extremists the Israelis make them out to be.

  2. Important story ... Ahed Tamimi has been documented challenging Israeli soldiers since the age of 9 ... given her youth back then, and appealing looks recalling those of the famous Hollywood child actress, plus her feisty character, Israelis nick-named her as 'Shirley Temper'

    Israel's famous pro-Palestinian peace activist, Uri Avnery, still going strong in his 90s now, reminds us of the demographics:

    « In today’s Hebrew Empire, from the Mediterranean Sea to the Jordan River, there is already a slight Palestinian majority – something like 8.2 million Arabs to 7.8 million Jews »

    It is thus clearly and directly Israeli Apartheid against the majority now


    And how about famous New Zealand young female pop singer Lorde - half-Irish, half-Croatian in heritage ... receiving tremendous personal abuse from the kosher nostra, after she refused to perform in Israel, in solidarity with Palestinians ... Jewish groups and media vilifying Lorde with shocking ferocity ... because she 'ain't gonna play Sun City'

    1. NONSENSE....it's a big act which will greatly help "Lordes" popularity....which may be the objective.First...the Jews don't give a damn about what the world thinks.Second...and more importantly "Lorde" is a NZ Jewess...BOTH her parents are JEWS.And third....this comment was very likely to have been written by a Jew.

    2. Can u show us proof her parents are Jews?

  3. Fascinating piece on how crypto-Jews almost took over the Jesuits & the Vatican in the 1500s

    But were defeated by an aggressive anti-Jewish faction, so thoroughly that the Jesuits actually banned descendants of Jews & Muslims from joining the Jesuit order, a ban which remained in effect for 338 years, from 1608 until 1946, during which time Jesuits investigated applicant genealogy for 5 generations previous

    A major idea in the article, is that opposition to the kosher nostra, is sometimes most effective by other ethnic groups using similar techniques ... 'You only defeat Jewish influence by mirroring their tactics'

    Unz - The Jesuit Order as a Synagogue of Jews

    When Spain 'expelled the Jews', huge numbers did not leave, but became fake Catholic converts ... a large number of them even joined the Vatican 'priesthood', a rabbi became a Spanish church bishop etc

    When Ignatius Loyola founded the Jesuits in 1534, he was, if not himself crypto-Jewish, greatly attracted by the funds he could obtain from crypto-Jewish sources to build up his new organisation, & allowed crypto-Jews to flood in & dominate his new enterprise until Loyola's death in 1556

    Jews were pressing into the Vatican itself to half take over ... but huge resentment had built up against Jewish influence

    « Complaints of native Spanish members of the Society of Jesus, regarding the crypto-Jewish Jesuit elite, are remarkably uniform. Predominant among their concerns was the Jewish tendency towards monopoly, nepotism, arrogance, aggressive ambition, & an air of insincerity in the practice of Christianity »

    The ethnic Europeans in the Jesuits became an opposing cabal against the crypto-Jews, & eventually won the ear of the Pope ... leading to the 'blood purity' regulations for anyone who wanted to join the Jesuits, the Pope's personal 'army'

    The take-away here, is that the kosher nostra is defeated by other ethnic groups forming cabals of their own

    Some note that in the USA today, it is Chinese & Hindu groups especially, & Vietnamese etc, which are winning significant territory from Jews ... USA elite universities which were formerly Jewish-dominated, are now Asian-dominated

    Chinese & Hindus in their diaspora, tend also to be 'high IQ' individuals, very hard-working, & very intra-community supportive ... with their ancient cultures they keep their traditional values against Western fashions, altho in external image adapting flexibly to local practices & power structures ... being usually not Abrahamic, they are relatively immune to Jewish claims of being 'specially chosen by God' etc ... Chinese & Hindu high-IQ sectors also overwhelm Jews in sheer numbers ... generally, they do not engage in polemics against the rival kosher nostra, but simply & quietly assemble wealth and power and influence spheres of their own, pushing Jews aside slowly but effectively

  4. Crikey! Read this, Aang. The US is nothing but pure evil.

    Birth Of An Insurgency: The US-Israeli “Secret Deal” To Manipulate Protests In Iran

    With the Trump and Netanyahu administrations now working in lockstep, U.S.-Israeli hostility towards Iran has now ripened into a plan to repeat what befell Syria over six years ago – the hijacking of minor protests and their transformation into the cover for a foreign-funded insurgency intent on toppling Iran’s elected government.


  5. In order to neutralize stories as above, our Swiss Natl Radio repeated on New Year’ s Eve, following story a g a i n.
    The speaker was stressing, that this would definitely be one of the most important stories of the year 2017.

    1. If they reduce to story to "WHO betrayed the Franks?", that's like asking, "WHO killed Jon-Benet Ramsey?" -- totally misleading, and papering over many other huge cracks in the story.

      Existing theories and commentaries are strong enough to point out the red flags: That the Franks were "hiding" in a literally glass house. Not only that, they had great quantities of food delivered on a daily basis. Pretty much everyone must have known what was going on. The arrest, some have suggested, bears many signs of a "business deal gone sour". The surviving staff, when interviewed years later, had nothing to add, and seemed embarrassed more than anything else.

      Did a girl named Anne exist? Quite likely. Did she Perish in a Nazi camp? Possibly. The rest of the story has been, sadly but unsurprisingly, hijacked and manipulated and turned into a money-making publishing, political and propaganda machine.

  6. "It is a war between the Jews and the non-Jews"

    "In his book Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House, Michael Wolff reports on clashes between Trump and his inner circle ...

    "Infighting among staff reportedly often featured a group including Kushner, Ivanka and the economics adviser Gary Cohn against a faction led by Bannon. Wolff quotes Richard Nixon’s national security adviser, Henry Kissinger, as saying: 'It is a war between the Jews and the non-Jews.'"


    1. But the Jews won, but Bannon was also a Zionist.

  7. Sometimes conservatives are enlightened. The American Conservative Blog is very anti-war.


    Daniel Larison

    Congress Needs to Oppose Trump’s Illegal War in Syria

    Sen. Cory Booker and Oona Hathaway call out Trump for planning to keep U.S. troops in Syria indefinitely:

    But the president doesn’t have the power to unilaterally make the decision to commit American troops to stop Mr. Assad by force. He needs to make his case to Congress and the American people, as well as the international community. Inserting American troops into this situation on his own is not just bad policy, it is illegal under both the Constitution and international law.

    It is encouraging to see some more opposition to Trump’s illegal war in Syria. Booker and Hathaway are correct that what Trump proposes to do (and what he’s already doing) in Syria breaks the law. The 2001 AUMF has been distorted and abused to cover a multitude of unnecessary wars over the last sixteen years, but there is no way that the administration can hide behind it this time.

    Booker and Hathaway’s op-ed would have been much stronger if they had emphasized that the U.S. military presence in Syria has been illegal from the start. Whatever one wants to say about the war on ISIS inside Iraq, the U.S. had no right to expand it into Syria. The U.S. had no right to put troops inside Syria without the permission of their government, and it still doesn’t. The U.S. has been trampling on international law in Syria for over three years. The difference now is that Trump is proposing to continue doing so without having the fig leaf of counter-terrorism to cover it up.

    The authors’ conclusion is correct:

    For several decades now, Congress has gradually ceded its war authority to the executive branch. If it does not act now, it may lose what authority remains. Congress has to attend to its constitutional duties: Our troops and their families deserve a public debate over the precise scope of their mission if we’re asking them to put their lives on the line.

    Congress must tell the president he cannot engage our troops in an illegal war in Syria. To allow this blatantly illegal action would spell the end of congressional authority over war.

    The danger in allowing Trump’s illegal war in Syria to go ahead uncontested is not just that it will let an incompetent president commit the U.S. to an open-ended mission in a devastated and war-torn country without authorization or debate, but that it will mean the president can ensnare the U.S. in wars of his choosing without any involvement from Congress. You may not care about what Trump is doing in Syria today, but you will care about what he or some other president chooses to do with this usurped authority elsewhere