Monday, 1 February 2016



Bernie Sanders urges raw vote count release from Iowa caucus after virtual tie with Clinton.

In the Iowa caucuses on 1 February 2016:

Cruz - 28% 

Trump - 24% 

Rubio - 23% 


H. Clinton - 49.9%

B. Sanders - 49.6%

Christians Enraged With Cruz Over Pro-Israel Comments

On 10 September 2014, America's Senator Ted Cruz, a Republican representing Texas, spoke at a meeting discussing the plight of Christians in the Middle East.

Cruz said: "Christians have no greater ally than Israel."

Cruz was booed and heckled and swiftly left the stage.

Cruz is too much of a nutcase to be elected President.

So, RUBIO may become the Republican candidate.


  1. AKA the battle of he Jew billionaires.

    1. Some arent Jews, just Zio's, but it doesnt matter


    3. Yes, Rodham vs Trump: the two good zios, friends of IsRaHell... Then, the first Lesbian US President will be crowned when Hillary will swear on the masonic bible:

      Surely the shadow power won't see a Trump, backed by the very same group that is attacked everyday with propaganda (the white "patriot" man) and will smile at the Rodham/Clinton presidency. Hillary is well described in the book TRANCEFORMATION OF AMERICA as a tool under control.


  3. A sound analysis, Rubio is now overwhelmingly likely the next President.



  6. Wow! Sanders is my man. But the left in power always disappoints, says John Pilger. The One Percent have so much power and have their tentacles in everything. And you also risk your life is you start to change things too much.

    1. Sanders is Jewish. Basically all politicians are the same and thats no secret. Sheeple reap what they sow.


  8. take into consideration

  9. PUBLISHED 14:26 JANUARY 26, 2016UPDATED 15:39 JANUARY 26, 2016

    “You tweet too much” about refugees, the Dutch are told by police

    By Dan Alexe
    Contributing Editor, New Europe
    Share on FacebookShare on Twitter+

    Dutch police have been visiting the homes of people critical of asylum centres on Twitter, urging them to delete posts.

    It was thus on a Monday, in the town of Sliedrecht, that Mark Jongeneel (28) got a very disturbing phone call. His mother was on the line, worried that two policemen were looking for him, but would not say why. As Jongeneel told the Dutch daily NRC Handelsblad, the police came to his office and told him: “You tweet too much. We have orders to ask you to watch your tone. Your tweets may seem seditious.”

    In Sliedrecht there had been a citizen meeting about a refugee center in the region. At the end, Jongeneel had posted a few tweets. One said: “The College of #Sliedrecht comes with a proposal to take 250 refugees over the next two years. What a bad idea! “Earlier he had also tweeted:” Should we let this happen?! ”

    In recent months, police have visited the homes of many more people that criticised the plans for asylum centres. In October 2015, in Leeuwarden about twenty opponents of the programs received police visits at home. It happened in Enschede, and in some places in the Brabant, where, according to the Dutch media, people who had been critical of the arrival of refugees and ran a page on social media on the topic were told to stop.

    A spokesman for the national police acknowledged to Handelsblad that there are ten intelligence units of “digital detectives” monitoring in real time Facebook pages and Twitter accounts and looking for posts that go “too far”.

    Citizens have even complained that it starts sounding as if the Netherlands were on the way to become “a police state.”

    On the other hand, as the Netherlands toughened its stance on newcomers in recent years, Dutch policy toward asylum-seekers and immigrants has been criticized by NGOs and the United Nations as overly strict.

    In an August 2015 report, the U.N.’s Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination told the Dutch they should meet migrants’ basic needs unconditionally.

    The EU’s leading human rights forum, the 47-nation Council of Europe admonished the Netherlands in 2014 for placing asylum seekers in administrative detention and leaving many “irregular immigrants” in legal limbo and destitution.

    Europe’s worst migrant and refugee crisis since World War Two has led to a surge in support for far right Dutch leader Geert Wilders, who wants to close the borders.

    In November last year, the Dutch high court upheld a government policy of withholding food and shelter to rejected asylum-seekers who refuse to be repatriated, giving legal backing to one of Europe’s toughest immigration policies.

    The Raad van State or Council of State, which reviews the legality of government decisions, found that the new policy of conservative Prime Minister Mark Rutte does not contravene the European Convention on Human Rights.

    A rejected asylum seeker does not have the right to appeal to the European Social Charter, it said.

    The Dutch government “has the right, when providing shelter in so-called locations of limited freedom, to require failed asylum-seekers to cooperate with their departure from the Netherlands,” a summary of the ruling said.

    The Netherlands is the eighth-largest destination for asylum seekers in the European Union."

  10. The idea is that Trump and Sanders, who are both men of integrity, are forced out by rigged primaries, and that Cruz then loses against Clinton in the election. Once the Clintons are back in the White House, the blackmail by the CIA and Israel begins.

    1. Astounding that anyone thinks any of these fakes has integrity or any other positive quality.
      This is like pro wrestling........FAKE!
      All the different personalities styles and slogans are created to give the illusion of an actual contest.
      This 'race' will be too close to call in both camps to keep their ever dwindling bases interested and engaged in the process. The fake process is an insult to all of us.

  11. The 62 people running the world are friends of Hillary.