Wednesday 3 February 2016

GUNS IN THE USA


Americans love violence.

80% of the firearms deaths in the developed world happen in the US, according to a new  study

Americans are 10 times more likely to be killed by a gun - compared to people living in other developed nations.

When it comes to homicides, Americans, aged 15-24, are 49 times more likely to be killed by a gun compared to people living in other developed nations around the world.

The statistics have been published in The American Journal of Medicine.

"Our firearms are killing us rather than protecting us,” says Professor Erin Grinshteyn, of the University of Nevada-Reno.

GUNS

Martin Bryant, said to be an Australian version of Paul Bonacci.

When the security services fear that the public might become alerted to their crimes regarding false flags and child abuse, what do they do?

They create a diversion.

A. Tasmania was the site of the Port Arthur massacre, which was blamed on Martin Bryant (above).

Tasmania "has served as the perfect Tavistock (mind control) laboratory."

In 1983-84, Martin Bryant "was first examined by one of Tavistock's senior representatives in Australia ... Dr. Eric Cunningham Dax ... who specialised in brainwashing."

Port Arthur.


Martin Bryant (centre)

Mind control is used to produce sex slaves, drug couriers and assassins.

Mind control is associated with Satanic ritual abuse.

Martin Bryant's neighbor, John Featherstone, said that "Bryant had at least three or four very distinct personalities". 

On 16 August 1993, Martin's father, Maurice, was found dead in mysterious circumstances.

A few months later, Martin's spinster friend and protector, the wealthy heiress Helen Harvey, died in mysterious circumstances.

In early 1994, Martin was in Hereford, the home of Britain's elite Special Air Services (SAS).


Port Arthur.

After the Port Arthur massacre took place on 28–29 April 1996, the security services needed a diversion.

They did not want people talking about mind controlled child sex slaves or about false flags that are part of the Strategy of Terror.

So, what was the diversion?

The media got people to start arguing about gun control.



B. In the case of the 13 March 1996 Dunblane massacre, the unofficial story is that Thomas Hamilton was supplying pornography, and young boys, to top people including policemen and politicians; and Thomas Hamilton may have been murdered, to shut him up.

It has been suggested that Thomas Hamilton was a brainwashed patsy and that the real shooters were working for the security services.

In the Dunblane shootings, "none of the survivors would have been able to obtain a good viewing of the gunman."

The Murder of Thomas Hamilton | Dunblane Exposed

So, what was the diversion?

The media got people to start arguing about gun control.


Carol Rutz wrote: "The CIA bought my services from my grandfather, in 1952, starting at the tender age of four. Over the next 12 years, I was tested, trained, and used in various ways. Electroshock, drugs, hypnosis, sensory deprivation, and other types of trauma were used to make me complain and split my personality (to create multiple personalities for specific tasks).

C. When the US military was carrying out false flag massacres in Vietnam, the US government needed a distraction.

The distraction was 'rock music, drugs, and sex'.



Misdirection is a form of deception in which the attention of an audience is focused on one thing in order to distract its attention from another.

If you are obsessed with gun rights, you have been subjected to misdirection.

If you GOOGLE Port Arthur, you will find endless articles about gun control.

You will find it very difficult to find any articles linking Port Arthur to mind controlled sex slaves or to the Strategy of Terror.

...

Washington's Blog has a list of 58 'False Flag' attacks, which government officials eventually admitted were false flag attacks.

Please note that none of these false flags was designed to bring about gun control.

For example:

1. The British government admits that - between 1946 and 1948 - it bombed 5 ships carrying Jews attempting to flee the Holocaust to seek safety in Palestine, set up a fake group called 'Defenders of Arab Palestine', and then had the pseudo-group falsely claim responsibility for the bombings

2. A top Turkish general admitted that Turkish forces burned down a mosque on Cyprus in the 1970s and blamed it on their enemy.

3. In 1993, a bomb in Northern Ireland killed 9 civilians. Official documents from the Royal Ulster Constabulary (i.e. the British government) show that the mastermind of the bombing was a British agent, and that the bombing was designed to inflame sectarian tensions.

4. An Indonesian fact-finding team investigated violent riots which occurred in 1998, and determined that “elements of the military had been involved in the riots, some of which were deliberately provoked”.


NATO also carried out terror attacks in France, Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Greece, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, the UK, and other countries.


Labels: , , ,

13 Comments:

At 4 February 2016 at 02:05 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

The problem isn't Americans themselves but the culture of violence and hate that forms a large part of their lives. You see it in everything from their attitudes to foreign prisoners to the ghastly scenes of violence in even mainstream fiction. Break the circle of violence by banning guns and abolishing the death penalty, and this would begin to change. But first the cycle of money and power needs to be broken.

 
At 4 February 2016 at 07:01 , Blogger James R said...

The people who are running the tyranny project have a checklist and one item on that list is the disarmament of all subject populations.
I did not care about Australian gun laws particularly until I discovered that the event that directly preceded them, the Port Arthur massacre, was a false flag terror attack designed specifically to end the gun law debate in Australia in the favour of the anti-gun side.
"The problem isn't Americans themselves but the culture of violence and hate that forms a large part of their lives." This is also a good point, the idea that the violence can be attributed to the proliferation of firearms alone is infantile nonsense. It wouldn't have anything to do with a culture that celebrates violence and killing as righteous 24/7 would it?
The statistics you quote are based on lies Aangirfan, lies that you have identified. Do you think the supposed Sandy Hook victims buttress those statistics? Of course they do.
Your support for tyranny in this matter does not fit in with the bulk of your work and directly contradicts the work you have done on Sandy Hook, the Eliot Rodgers case and many others.
You are on the wrong side of history in this matter Aangirfan, you are on the side of tyranny and the New World Order and CNN and all the other liars. It does not fit with the bulk of the positions that are taken here, in fact it directly contradicts them.

 
At 4 February 2016 at 09:06 , Blogger Anon said...

Maybe my critics have not understood the psy-op.

In the USA, the Powers-That-Be may APPEAR to want to get rid of guns, but SECRETLY they want people to buy more guns.

Congress is opposed to gun control.

Who controls Congress?

Lots of people have been mind-controlled into believing the following falsehoods:

1. People Power brought down the Berlin Wall (The KGB and CIA jointly helped organise that false flag) and toppled Suharto and toppled Ben Ali.

2. The Dunblane Massacre was not about child abuse rings but was about gun control.

3. The World is not bisexual

4. The socialist aspects of government in Switzerland and Singapore have ruined those two countries.

5. Jeremy Corbyn and Donald trump are hated by the Powers-That-Be

6. Port Arthur was about gun control and had nothing to do with Mossad.

- Aangirfan

 
At 4 February 2016 at 10:15 , Blogger James R said...

Thanks for responding Aangirfan.My knowledge of Dunblane is limited but my understanding is that it was about both child abuse and gun control, both goals were served.Port Arthur may well for all I know have been conducted by the Mossad but there is no doubt that the event was used to achieve tighter gun control, it was part of a very successful anti-gun psyop and the connection between Port Arthur and gun control in Australia is as clear as the link between 911 and the war on terror.
I have no personal interest in guns and had no problem with the laws until I discovered that Port Arthur was a false flag attack it made me oppose the whole project because if they are using events like Port Arthur and Sandy Hook to pursue this goal, the goal is discredited by that very fact alone.
There is nothing else that you have written that I would quibble with although the comment that "Congress opposes Gun control" is clearly an oversimplification,some oppose and others support.
But inside the US Government it is a different story. Eric Holder was the US Attorney General at the time of Sandy Hook and was also involved in the trafficking of firearms to Mexican drug gangs as part of a supposed sting operation. The weapons sent to the cartels turned up in the US and were linked to several killings including of US Law Enforcement officials.Holder was a senior figure in the Department of Justice for several decades and many researchers link him to the Oklahoma City false flag of 1995.
http://americanfreepress.net/did-holder-cover-up-fbis-role-in-95-okc-bomb-plot/
Eric Holder - We Must "Brainwash" People Against Guns! - (1995)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=7&v=RXwo9lARAgg

 
At 4 February 2016 at 11:16 , Blogger Anon said...

In the case of Dunblane, the gun control element was to distract people away from the child abuse ring element.

There may also have been a Strategy of Terror element.

The same with Port Arthur.

You refer to 9 11.

It had nothing to do with gun control and everything to do with the Strategy of Terror (Operation Gladio)

Think of the Bologna Bombing.

That was not about gun control.

It was just another Gladio operation used to frighten and control people.

Think of the Charlie Hebdo attacks, the London Bombings, the shootings in Belgian supermarkets, and a host of other such Gladio events.

None of these was about gun control.

Sandy Hook was about the Strategy of Terror, and child abuse rings.

If the US government really wanted to bring about gun control, they could do it almost over night.

After 9 11, the US government had no problem in passing anti-terror laws.

Just remember who is behind the NRA. Its members have included Eisenhower, JF Kennedy, Ronald Reagan, George Bush, Oliver North, John Bolton...

There will be more false flag operations, but there will be no effective gun control.

The majority of Congress is opposed to effective gun control.

 
At 4 February 2016 at 15:03 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

The media the world over are guilty of causing division between men and woman for many reasons. Television plays a great role in this brainwashing and unfortunately 'developed' countries are where more people watch more TV. Their heads filled with ideas and prejudices. The rise of inequality doesn't help either. The people on the street are too busy with us and them that they are totally distracted from what's really going on in this world. "My people perish for lack of knowledge". Thanks to sites like this for hard work sharing the truth. I guess all we can do is keep sharing knowledge and truth hopefully one day people will realise whats really going on.

 
At 4 February 2016 at 16:29 , Blogger James R said...

I wrote that"the connection between Port Arthur and gun control in Australia is as clear as the link between 911 and the war on terror." How on earth do you take that as a suggestion that 911 had anything to do with gun control?
To clarify, I am stating that just as 911 was the trigger for the war on terror, Port Arthur was the trigger for gun control in Australia. Just as the Patriot Act was passed in the weeks after 911 when everybody was shocked and upset, so it was with the new gun laws in Australia after Port Arthur.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_laws_in_Australia
"The Port Arthur massacre in 1996 transformed gun control legislation in Australia. 35 people were killed and 23 wounded when a man with a history of violent and erratic behaviour beginning in early childhood[19] opened fire on shop owners and tourists with two semi-automatic rifles. Six weeks after the Dunblane massacre in Scotland,[14] this mass killing at the notorious former convict prison at Port Arthur horrified the Australian public and had powerful political consequences."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Port_Arthur_massacre_%28Australia%29#Community_and_government_reaction
"Australians reacted to the event with widespread shock and horror, and the political effects were significant and long-lasting."
As far as Sandy Hook goes, simply stating that "Sandy Hook was about the Strategy of Terror, and child abuse rings." is worthless unless you can provide evidence to support the claim. Anyone with any common sense at all knows that Sandy Hook had something to do with gun control. Here is the evidence. Where is yours?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assault_Weapons_Ban_of_2013
"Efforts to create a new federal Assault Weapons Ban (AWB 1994) were renewed on December 14, 2012, when 20 children and six adults were shot and killed at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut.[1]"
"Within hours of the shooting, a We the People user started a petition asking the White House to "immediately address the issue of gun control through the introduction of legislation in Congress." That afternoon, President Barack Obama made a televised statement offering condolences on behalf of the nation to Connecticut governor, Dannel Malloy and saying, "we're going to have to come together and take meaningful action to prevent more tragedies like this, regardless of the politics."[5]"
"The Assault Weapons Ban of 2013 (AWB 2013) was a bill introduced in the 113th United States Congress as S. 150 by Senator Dianne Feinstein, D-CA, on January 24, 2013, one month after the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting."

 
At 5 February 2016 at 00:31 , Blogger Anon said...

You have been misdirected.

Please read the update to the post.

 
At 5 February 2016 at 11:21 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

The fundamental assumption of pro gun people is that guns can keep a person safe from a variety of threats. It is from this point that gun proponents launch into a wide range of rationalizations in favor of more guns.
Robbers, muggers, SWAT teams, looters and the like are the threats that guns supposedly eliminate. Dream world stuff. The facts are that the USA has way more death pain and misery from guns than comparable nations without guns.

The cold hard numbers of gun deaths, accidental gun deaths, accidental gun injuries and gun suicides CLEARLY indicate that hundreds of thousands of US families each year are forced to endure pain and trauma.
Children in affected families suffer greatly.

Guns would seem to fit the agenda of the NWO in the USA.
The best way to make people want something is to make it scarce. Prohibition in the US was followed by a massive increase in drinking, especially among women. Silly toys like Elmo dolls and the like were classic cases of scarcity based marketing. And every time we hear rumblings of how the big evul gubermint is gonna steal our guns..........the gun makers celebrate another record year of sales and profits. Guns do not keep a country safe.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_firearm-related_death_rate

 
At 7 February 2016 at 14:07 , Anonymous nick said...

completely right, its the culture of violence - led by the government of course who respond with violence all around the world.
Do not blame the gun though, look at the example of Switzerland where every male has an automatic rifle in his house and compulsory training. Gun crime is very low there. They have a more peaceful society.

 
At 18 February 2016 at 04:02 , Blogger Unknown said...

All this happen because of the unbelievable no of guns and firearms in USA. All this has increased the no of crimes as mortality rate. The laws are supposed to be implemented with force so that nothing illegal can happen so that all those having license can only have that killer in their hand.
Regards:
MA Gun License

 
At 19 February 2016 at 05:05 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

C'mon aanirfan, play fair, and allow pro 2nd amendment views through too.

Or has your study of the bad guys started to morph you?

 
At 19 February 2016 at 14:35 , Blogger Unknown said...

No the USA does not have more than any other Country in gun deaths. Are you really going to trust what numbers come from the government! A government who stages false flags and lies to us on everything just to manipulate us. I believe in Honduras, El Salvador, Venezuela have much worse crime. When someone can't even step out of their home at night for fear of being raped or murdered! You don’t find that happening in the United States not at least where I live. And yes we are allowed to own guns and get a concealed carry permit. If someone came at me with a knife the best way to beat him is to shoot him with a gun. I say take the guns away from the Cartels and gangs not law abiding citizens. It makes no sense to disarm law abiding Americans.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home