Saturday, 19 September 2015


Brabantian comments:

EU Migrant 'refugee' crisis - facts that EU leaders are hiding:

(1) Most of the 'Syrians' (etc) now invading Europe had been living quite comfortably among fellow Muslims in Turkey for several years

(2) Recently, Erdogan's Turkey and US-Nato decided to 'Release the Kraken!'.

They told hundreds of thousands of Syrian (etc) campers their support will be cut, and they should / must 'go to the EU'.

Erdogan's Turkey/US/NATO & assisted them with directions and transit to the EU; and not to Arab-Muslim countries with the same religion, language, culture as most migrants

(3) Merkel and EU leaders know all this but are hiding it.

They are promoting the 'Syrian refugee crisis' in order to:

(a) Overwhelm the EU border countries - in order to assist the oligarchs of Germany, France and the UK to dominate and exploit the people.

(b) Begin destroying the EU's middle classes by overwhelming and crashing the EU's social benefit systems, thus impoverishing the EU to allow for better oligarch exploitation and control.

(c) Begin destabilising EU societies via cultural conflict, and, the insertion of many jihadis groomed by US-Nato-Israel - fostering ethnic hatred and 'terror' to detract from oligarch exploitation.

(d) Give a pretext to Nato-USA-Israel to bomb-attack-destroy Syria, because:

(i) Syria supplies and supports Lebanon's Hezbollah which defeated Israel in battle.

(ii) Syria's secular tolerant multi-religious polity is the target for destruction by chaos-seeking Nato-USA-Israel.

(iii) Syria gives an important Mediterranean naval base to Russia.

(iv) Syria is in path of the Qatar-Saudi-Nato pipeline dreams to shunt aside Iran and Russia.




    Its no secret

  2. prepare the ground for the eventual invasion and occupation of Lebanon and Syria by Israel in accordance with their plan to establish a "greater Israel".


  4. Israel covets the territories of Syria and Lebanon for their Eretz Israel project. Ethnic cleansing of those lands is underway.

  5. I put this out to wind the libertarians up recently, but it has merit. This is not one world government but is encouraging third world countries to take control of their banking system, then instead of money being created by private bankers for profit, governments can create the money supply for the benefit of ordinary people.

    How social Security can save the world ? The case for publicly owned banks.

    One of the reasons for the population explosion is that in much poorer countries people often have very large families to ensure that there is someone to look after them in old age. Imagine what it must feel like knowing that you may starve to death in old age because there is no one to take care of you.

    Now some children unfortunately die and others won't be loyal when they grow up and will go, so poor people in third world countries may have up to 8 children, or more. Now we could teach governments how to use fiat money to pay for social security and old age care even though these countries are very poor. People will have faith in government money, and if not, this needs to be encouraged which will take time but the investment is worth while.

    The government can then spend the fiat money on good quality heath care and when the care workers ‘do work’ this gives the fiat currency its value. As people have faith in the government currency they can then spend this into the wider community on goods and services, and this encourages local businesses to flourish and some people might start to get rich. So there is no need for poor countries to be poor as long as the local environment can grow sufficient food and supply raw materials. The government fiat money now circulates around the economy creating work because people can earn the money to pay for things. Governments can easily end recessions this way.

    But there's a problem, coins can last forever and notes could last a very long time too, and so every time the governments needs to pay for more health care it will need to print more money and this could inflate the money supply causing inflation. Now this won't occur if the government money is driving the economy and creating work – where the money gets soaked up and used. But if the money supply exceeds the amount of work that is being generated the solution is to take some of the money back again and this is what we would call tax. So in other words, we don't raise taxes to pay for government services, we only raise them to stop an economy from overheating. This is a very interesting new understanding of fiat money, something the Austrian School had not thought of. And the same principle can apply to our own economies today if the government were to create public banks. So there is no need for any austerity.

    This means that there is an almost magical function of government as issuer of the currency, and that high quality public services can be had for very low tax indeed if we were to have public banks pay for the services. And this would also help the economy as a whole as the public workers spend their wages into the wider economy. And if the economy is overheating because of too much money supply the government can then reign some of it back in by taxing. This has no effect on anyone’s spending power and is not aggression. By taking some of the money back in through taxation the price of goods will not inflate. In other words, the government is keeping your money strong by retaining its purchasing power.

    For more information look up Modern Money Theory.

  6. Re-blogged to The Tap. Thanks.