Friday, 18 September 2015

Jeremy Corbyn - Fabian

15 comments:

  1. Speaking of Fabians, H.G. Welles and George Bernard Shaw were members in good standing, both of whom approved of the Nazi project for the extermination of useless feeders.

    The present day Fabians share that enthusiasm, but they prefer mass immigration, sex education and mass slaughter of the unborn as the method of destroying the useless consuming masses of the European nations.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A load of BS. So sex education is bad according to u? Now u have just proved urself indeed a useless eater.

      Delete
    2. I guess I should have put sex education in quotes. I was referring to the promotion of all forms of non-reproductive sex from Kindergarten and up. Europeans still fuck, presumably, but to little effect. They are reproductively dysfunctional. Their fertility is way below below the replacement rate. That's why mass immigration amounts to genocide. Most people in Britain get that. But not Anonny boy, apparently.

      Delete
    3. They were out and out supporters of the New Bolshevik (Communism) regime.....useful idiots as Stalin would have called them.

      Delete
  2. I hadn't had a chance to visit the site for a few days, so missed the post "Is Jeremy Corbyn a Freemason?" when it went up earlier this week.

    As of today, the post in question concludes with this ominous message from Google (where the website links would normally be at the foot of the blogpost): 'In response to a legal request submitted to Google, we have removed 4 result(s) from this page.'

    Can anyone shed light on this? What were the website being linked to, and what is so terrible about them that an immediate court order had to be obtained (costing a no-doubt staggering sum in legal fees)? My desire to know is now increased since the almighty God Google told me I could not!

    ReplyDelete
  3. My initial view of Corbyn was based on the fact that someone like Miliband (or more obviously Blair) is just the same as a Tory and that Corbyn had stuck up for the priest who posted the "Israel Did 911" Wikispooks link on his Facebook page.
    I had never actually heard Corbyn speak, I watched an interview, a very short three minute interview the other day and was stunned by the blandness and mediocrity.
    It is like they have installed a Greens leader as the Labor leader. I do not think he will tell the truth about anything and expect to hear about issues like climate change and EU co-operation at length. He seems to be almost deliberately ineffectual.
    On the other hand Corbyn has I suppose, a quiet dignity and Tom Watson has been involved in trying to expose both Murdoch's criminality and the VIP child abuse to some extent, so there is some hope there perhaps.
    Ultimately Corbyn seems to be part of the establishment with all the associations with cover up and corruption that are entailed with that.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Corbyn has retracted the sticking up for the priest bit.....and now says it related to an earlier subject.....how convenient. These silly fools that think Corbyn is the 'New Messiah' should watch "THE Life Of Brian".

      Delete
  4. That video is great, should have watched it before commenting. Corbyn argument over in my opinion. He's a phony. Fabian society is perhaps THE key NWO vehicle in Australia

    ReplyDelete
  5. How long will it take for people to realise that there are no good guys. If someone is in a position of power, they are ipso facto bad guys.

    The good guys are the ordinary people.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The bad guys are largely 'ordinary people' who have been co-opted. All are susceptible to sinning, and 'The love of money is the root of all evil.' It's the monopoly control of money (whether private or governmental) that is the core vice in our society which disinherits its members and makes them all financier-fodder.

      Delete
  6. Excellent commentary about the brainwashing of the liberal left, which, sadly is so effective.

    ReplyDelete
  7. 'Fabian Socialists':

    The name of the society was suggested by the Spiritualist, Frank Podmore, who named it after the brilliant, elderly, third century Roman general, censor and consul, Quintus Fabius (Maximus Verrucosus 303-203 BC) who was made a dictator in 221-217 BC and, with his small band of fighting guerrillas and superior cunning, successfully defended Rome by defeating Hannibal's much bigger and mighty Carthaginian army through "gradualism" and "terrorism" during the time of the second Punic War.

    Initially he kept to the hills and cunningly hampered the enemy's progress by cutting off their food and supply lines with "delaying tactics" until Rome could assemble enough men to defend the city successfully.

    During the war, his slow, "gradual," delaying tactics were greatly disapproved of by his soldiers and the civilians and earned him the name of 'Cunctator' the 'Delayer.'
    But later, after the triumph, his skill and wisdom was highly appreciated. He died in his 100th year in 203 BC.

    The only difference between Fabian Socialism and Communism is that Communists take your house by directly sending in the "secret police" to knock your front door down Fabian Socialists do it much more subtly and cleverly by "gradually" taking your individual rights away, by "gradually" increasing property taxes and rates, and finally, when you can't pay them, they send in their regional "council tax inspectors" to take your house away but the end result is the same.

    Fabian Socialism is a "mixture" of Fascism, Nazism, Marxism and Communism all bundled together.

    http://www.abeldanger.net/2010/12/city-of-london-fabian-society-history.html#more

    AkhaldanSolo

    ReplyDelete
  8. FABIAN SOCIETY "FIVE YEAR PLAN"

    The plan involved the subtle transfer of the entire productive capacity of each country throughout the world into a series of great "State-owned" departments, which would then be "corporatized", then "privatized" to City of London Corporation International banks and corporations which they control.

    Individual property ownership would be severely restricted, with most of the land, sea, fisheries, rivers, lakes, ports, railways, communications, media, roads, electricity, energy, food, water, waste management, housing, farms, commercial property, schools, hospitals, police, social welfare, Inland Revenue etc. transferred into statutory corporations, companies or land trusts which indirectly would be owned by City of London banks.

    The "peasants" would still be allowed to own their own clothes, and small assets like furniture, cars and boats etc., but the main assets of each country would be owned by their multi-national corporations and banks.

    In essence the City of London Corporation would become the "One World Earth Corporation" and would privately own the world.

    Similar to the experiment carried out in the in the USSR, the whole world would eventually be transferred into a Communist "United Nations" World Soviet Socialist Republic, where each country would be "regionalized" and ruled through "Regional Councils" through a United Nations dictatorship called a "Parliamentary Assembly" which would be just another name for a Soviet "Central Committee" and all independent, sovereign, national governments would be totally abolished. PRIVATIZATION OF THE WORLD.

    AS

    ReplyDelete
  9. Above description sounds just like Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030 (except cars would be frowned on)

    ReplyDelete
  10. You say Rik Clay's father sent you a CD? did he tell you how he died?

    ReplyDelete