Tuesday 10 June 2014


Scientists are sceptical of satellite firm Inmarsat's raw data on missing Malaysian flight MH370.

"Scientists have questioned the quality of raw data released by British satellite company Inmarsat that was used to determine Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 crashed into the Indian Ocean.

"They said the information was insufficient to plot its course."

The boss of Emirates chief asks why no fighter jet intercepted missing flight MH370.

"Emirates chief Tim Clark has questioned why fighter jets did not intercept Malaysia Airlines flight 370 when it veered widely off course.

"Clark told The Australian Financial Review that the plane would have been intercepted by military aircraft if it had flown off course over other countries.

"'If you were to fly from London to Oslo and then over the North Sea you turned off and then went west to Ireland, within two minutes you’d have Tornadoes, Eurofighters, everything up around you,' he said."


MH370 could have been shot down off the coast of Vietnam during a joint Thai-US military training exercise.

Missing Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 was 'shot down'

Mike McKay was working on the Songa Mercur oil rig off the coast of Vietnam.

He says that, on 8 March 2014, he saw what he thinks was 'MH370 on fire'.

stuff.co.nz / .dailymail.

Mike Mckay sent an email about his sighting to his employers.

The email was leaked to the media.

The email address was inundated inquiries.

'This became intolerable for them and I was removed from the rig and not invited back,' he told New Zealand's Sunday Star Times.

In his email, McKay described his exact location on the oil rig, the compass bearing of where the aircraft was in relation to the rig, the approximate distance of the plane from the rig, the current on the water surface and the wind direction.

After reading the email, Vietnamese authorities started an initial search in the South China Sea.

This search in the South China Sea was called off when the hunt for MH370 switched to the Andaman Sea and then to the southern part of the Indian Ocean.

Since then, he says, neither the Malaysian nor Australian search teams had contacted him.

Labels: ,


At 10 June 2014 at 01:16 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

really, how can a hoax be shot down?

At 10 June 2014 at 03:50 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Libyan Army General Khalifa Haftar a CIA operative: Analyst


At 10 June 2014 at 06:56 , Blogger dognamedblue said...

it definitely won't be the first time they've shot something down
either deliberately or by accident
even deliberately using an accident as cover for their nefarious plans (insert menacing laugh mwa-ha-ha etc etc)

At 10 June 2014 at 09:33 , Anonymous Ed(itor) said...

"Anonymous10 June 2014 01:16
really, how can a hoax be shot down?"

With Ex-hoax-a-cet missiles fired from controlled media sites...

At 10 June 2014 at 09:51 , Blogger Anon said...

Lockerbie etc.


- Aangirfan

At 10 June 2014 at 10:20 , Blogger hirundine said...

More to the point, why? The operators of aircraft take it off line, to be shot down? Not much logic there? Logic still says it was landed somewhere, first. Then, maybe, it was dumped somewhere?

At 10 June 2014 at 13:21 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

when Nigel Cawthorne first published his theory, Australian news http://www.news.com.au/world/new-book-says-missing-malaysia-airlines-flight-mh370-might-have-been-shot-down-by-mistake-during-a-military-operation/story-fndir2ev-1226921857886
commented rather negatively on Cawthorne, blocked all comments for the report to this very day.. later on, same news agency showed an interview with Cawthorne, again trying to degrade the author with hypocritical arguments..
very obviously, MSM prefers the whereabouts of the flight in Diego Garcia, Kazakhstan, West of Australia or on the dark side of the Moon..

At 10 June 2014 at 14:34 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Redirected to the US and the hi- tech geeks on board (totalling over 30 I have heard) repatriated and/or murdered.

At 11 June 2014 at 06:30 , Blogger Unknown said...

Hi Aang & Irfan,

After some delay I have managed to return to the vexing question of who really is Bryan Singer and how much does he know, how deeply is he involved?

This trail has led back to a film he directed that was released way back in 1993.

It is called "Public Access". At 9 minutes 33 seconds into the film there is featured in the background an interview with an expert about how to capture and subdue a (monarch) butterfly as "what we want to do is to stop it from living". The soundtrack explains this as the frame zooms in on a black and white picture of a son with its father...

Go figure.


Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home