Sunday, 28 May 2023

THE CIA RUNS THE PEDOPHILE RINGS



The media has been telling us about the child abuse and child murders associated with such places as:

1. The Arthur G Dozier School, in Marianna in Florida

2. Boys town, in Omaha

3. Colonia Dignidad, in Chile

4. Certain children's homes and hospitals in Australia, Canada, the USA and the UK

5. Certain child brothels in Thailand, Cambodia, London etc.

6. Marc Dutroux's cellars in Belgium.

7. Certain pool parties in Hollywood.

Elliot Rodger - sex slave?.



 (http://www.thewhitehouseboys.com/) 

It has become clear that all of the above child abuse can be linked to the CIA, and its friends.

You could say that the culprits are a 'Zionist-Nazi-Mafia faction' within the CIA, Mossad and the Pentagon.

If the CIA wants to control the boss of MI6, or the Secretary General of NATO, or a top Hollywood entertainer, or the President of the United States, or a member of a royal family, or a newspaper editor, or a key employee of Google, it can supply them with young girls or boys.

In order to get the system in place, the CIA has to know where children will be available for abuse.

A guide book is helpful.


In 1964, an American called Bob Damron published a book listing gay bars.

The CIA is reported to have photographs of certain top foreign dignitaries visiting such bars.

From 1969/1970 onwards you could buy the Spartacus guide book which listed the child brothels all around the world from Port Au Prince to Pattaya.

It was a very fat guide book.

It was advertised in the mainstream media and was available in the larger bookshops.

In other words, the security services seemed to be encouraging people to buy the book.



Now, the big question is, how on earth did the Spartacus editors know the details of all these brothels around the world?

The people most likely to know all the details were the CIA and its friends.

The CIA has been linked to child abuse and child murder worldwide.



Former priest, John Stamford, was the publisher of Spartacus. BOYLINKS - USA, UK, EUROPE, THE WORLD

The Spartacus Club and Spartacus International were run from Amsterdam by John Stamford, a former Roman Catholic priest from the UK.

In 1995, Stamford died mysteriously in prison in Belgium, aged 56.

Spartacus members got a '10% Discount' at the Elm Guest House boy brothel in London.

Ex-Tory minister 'pictured in child sex abuse video' confiscated by customs



Peter Glencross, commercial manager of Spartacus, helped persuade Carole Kasir to turn her Elm Guest House into a boy brothel.

Peter Glencross reportedly set out to create a network of child brothels for Spartacus members.

Customers of the Elm Guest house included members of MI5 and a cabinet minister, reportedly.

Elm guest house scandal: Coded advert that gave signal to perverts



According to the German blog brunoleaks:

John D. Stamford "was responsible for the exploitation of children in Thailand, Sri Lanka, the Philippines …"

In London five star accolades are given, by Spartacus, to - Heaven (Richard Branson), Subway, Napoleon, Bolts, the Tent...

Spartacus | theneedleblog


Ecole en Bateau, a front for a paedophile ring. Azimuth Trust was linked to 'boat schools'

"The details of each of the Spartacus members, including their sexual preferences, the desired age of the children and preferred countries of origin were stored on a computer.

Paedophiles who prey on youngsters worldwide - World - News ...

"An estimated 200,000 Nepalese children have been sold into sexual slavery in India; in Thailand up to a quarter of a million children work in brothels; and in Colombia one third of prostitutes are thought to be under 14."

Paedophiles who prey on youngsters worldwide - World - News ...


In 1955, we have the earliest recorded instance of child abuse by Sir Jimmy Savile (above right), who is believed to have worked for the security services. In the late 1950's, Savile visited Moscow. On one occasion he gave a talk to the Israeli cabinet. He was a friend of the Chief of the UK Defence Staff.

We can go back at least as far as 1950 when Eisenhower, Hoover and Edward Teller attended the Bohemian Grove in California.

Bohemian Grove is where the top people meet and reportedly get involved in child abuse and worse.

In other words, there is a long history of the top people being involved in child abuse.

BOHEMIAN GROVE AND THE US MILITARY

..

What we are talking about is child sex slaves, produced by the CIA.

In 1953 the US government sanctioned Project MKUltra, the CIA's programme to produce mind-controlled people, including child sex slaves.

Experiments are carried out on large numbers of children taken from children's care homes, such as Boys Town.



The MK ULTRA scientists, working in around 80 institutions, included Nazi war criminals.

Donald Ewen Cameron worked on the programme in Canada and William Sargant worked on the programme in London.

The MK ULTRA scientists made use of torture.


From the 1940s onwards, the Arthur G Dozier School, in Marianna in Florida, was a home for boys.

It is situated near a military base and may be linked to the CIA's MK ULTRA mind control programme.

When a child is being mind-controlled, he is often forced to watch the murder of another child.

Excavators have discovered at least 50 bodies buried in the grounds of the school, which was shut in 2011.



In 2008, the Governor of Florida, Charlie Crist, was forced to launch an investigation into the "hundreds of unmarked graves located at the school".

Rape, torture and murder took place at this school in the 1940s, 1950s and 1960s.

Dick Colon said he was forced to lie face-down on a blood-soaked pillow that had small pieces of lip, tongue and skin from the previous boy's beating.

Colon recalls looking through the steamed-up window of a tumble-drier in the school laundry and seeing a black boy inside, churning round and round.






In the 1950s and 1960s, in Northern Ireland, there was 'Nazi-style' abuse of children in children's care homes.

One former resident says that "he was in a chain gang polishing floors, bathed in detergent as punishment and sexually assaulted by a woman when he was aged five or six.

Church-run 'hell hole' homes were 'like Nazi concentration camps' / Children Forced To 'Eat Their Own Vomit' In Church-Run 'Hell Hole' / Children's homes 'like Auschwitz'





The top Zionists and the top Nazis work together.

In the mid 1950s, the charity Colonia Dignidad was set up in Chile by a 'Jewish Nazi' called Paul Schäfer Schneider.

Reportedly, the CIA, Mossad and the West German secret service used Colonia Dignidad for experiments involving the torture and mind control of kidnapped children.

"It was known since 1964 that the members of the commune were being subjected to torture; it was known since 1977 that political prisoners were tortured there; and the child abuse was known about since the 1970s."

Child abuse charity, CIA child torture, Colonia Dignidad

...

"Germans in the colony knew how to keep a person alive for several days or weeks while putting him or her through the most terrible agony and humiliation..."

Colonia Dignidad is said to have links to a large number of Nazis linked to Operation Paperclip, MK ULTRA brainwashing, satanic ritual abuse, AmeriCares, the Knights of Malta and the Vatican.

German authorities investigated charges that from thirty to forty children reported missing from the Bonn and Cologne areas wound up at Colonia Dignidad.

Child abuse charity, CIA child torture, Colonia Dignidad


Michael Townley - "the primary liaison between Colonia Dignidad and the Pinochet regime was an American CIA agent named MichaelTownley who also served as a member of the Chilean secret police in addition to helping plan the military coup that ousted Allende." Latin American Cults Part I

In 1956, John Ross led a fact-finding committee investigating Australian children's homes to which British children had been sent.

He wanted 26 institutions blacklisted. His report was ignored by the government.

Large numbers of children have been tortured and raped in children's care homes in Australia.

The CIA is said to control the key people in Australia.


Boys' home horror recalled.

Often the police have been involved in the abuse.

Two journalists from Australia's Sun-Herald claimed see evidence of the satanic ritual abuse of children.

They interviewed six mothers whose children had disclosed experiences of Satanic Ritual Abuse and organised abuse in New South Wales.

LAND OF CHILD ABUSING CLERGY, POLITICIANS..



In 1957, Cathy O'Brien was born.

She became a child victim of the mind control government project named Project Monarch, part of MK ULTRA

She recalls that as a child she was sexually abused by international pedophile rings, drug barons and satanists.

THE BUSH FAMILY.



In 1957, 11-year-old Moira Anderson was last seen boarding a bus in Coatbridge, near Glasgow, Scotland.

According to The Sunday Times (Pressure on police to release paedophile dossier), 23 April 2006, Strathclyde Police have a dossier listing members of a child-abuse ring.

The dossier is said to implicate senior public figures, including senior police officers and members of the Crown Office and former Scottish Office.


The Bexley Boys Home in Australia - opened in 1915 and closed in 1979.

From the 1960s and 1970s onwards Boys were being 'rented out' for abuse at a Salvation Army boys' home in Australia.

"A man named FV told police that in 1974 the Superintendent of the Bexley home, Captain Lawrence Wilson, introduced him to a woman in Salvation Army uniform who was accompanied by a man.

"FV said they took him back to their home and sexually abused him."



Billy Bryars, the son of an oil magnate, ran a 'boy brothel' at the summit of Laurel Canyon in California.

Customers at the boy brothel were said to include J. Edgar Hoover and his 'gay' partner Clyde Tolson.

Inside The Laurel Canyon.

California is a major site for CIA mind-control experiments.

Elvis is said to have been mind-controlled.



In 1961, in the UK, the Conservative Party's Monday Club was set up.

Its members have included Harvey Proctor, Rhodes Boyson and Peter Bottomley.

Members of the Monday Club are said to have visited the Elm Guest house boy brothel, and taken young boys to Amsterdam.

The Elm Guest House has been linked to MI5.



In 1963, John Wetterer was active in Vietnam.

John Wetterer, set up the Shoeshine Boys Foundation.

Allegedly, the Shoeshine Boys was a pedophile ring serving the American military.

Wetterer was helped by Robert Macauley, the founder of AmeriCares, an organisation which has been linked to the CIA.


Kray Twins, possible victims of mind control. KRAY TWINS BRAINWASHED?

In 1963, Winston Churchill's close friend Lord Boothby was introduced to the Kray twins.

The Kray Twins were  murderous gangsters who reportedly supplied young boys to the elite.

The Kray Twins reportedly had a connection to the security services.

KRAY TWINS BRAINWASHED?



Reportedly, around 50,000 aboriginal (native Indian) children died in residential schools in Canada

Canada has been a major centre of CIA mind-control experiments.

In 1964, William Combes says he witnessed "the abduction of ten fellow residential school children by the Queen of England and her husband in October, 1964 at the Catholic school in Kamloops, British Columbia, Canada."


ukpaedos-exposed.com.

In the 1960's, child abuse was taking place at the Kincora boys home, in Belfast

Reportedly, Kincora was run as a boy brothel by MI5, which wanted to blackmail and control certain political leaders.

Jimmy Savile used to visit Northern Ireland.

In 1963, a male victim came forward to claim that Jimmy Savile raped him in Cheshire but he was told by police to "forget about it".

From 1965 - 1988, Sir Jimmy Savile was a volunteer porter and fundraiser at Stoke Mandeville hospital.

He had his own quarters there.

Reportedly, satanic ritual abuse took place at the hospital.

In 1965, Greystone Heath approved school for boys in Warrington was being used by a child abuse ring.

http://www.nickdavies.net/1998/04/01...se-in-britain/



In 1966, Lord Mountbatten introduced Savile to Prince Philip.

In 1966,Jimmy Savile was awarded was honorary green beret by the Royal Marines.

In 1966, Michael Trestrail, 'linked to the Elm guest house boy brothel', became the Duke of Edinburgh's "personal police officer".

In 1967, Prince Edward became the Grand Master of the United Grand Lodge of England, the governing body of Freemasonry in England and Wales.


Guy Marsden

In 1967, Jimmy Savile's nephew, 13 year old Guy Marsden, was frequently taken to the homes of wealthy celebrities.

In these homes, men sexually abused girls and boys as young as 10, with Savile present.

In 1969, Savile visited the island of Jersey, famous for child abuse, child torture and child murder.

In 1969, the BBC's Savile recorded 'Christmas Songs of Praise' from Calder High School.

The BBC is said to be run by the security services. Its key employees usually have links to the military and Israel.



From at least the 1970s onwards, Boys were being sexually abused at Boys Town, in Omaha.

Larry King got children for his Franklin child abuse ring from Boys Town, Omaha.

Child victims said that King took part in the satanic ritual murder of children.

www.francesfarmersrevenge.com: theNSAisWATCHIN.

The "Washington Post", "New York Times", "Village Voice" and "National Law Journal" referred to the accusations.

King was linked to Iran-Contra.

King was said to have provided the CIA with information gained from the users of the child sex ring.

BOYS TOWN AND THE POPE / OMAHA IS FAMOUS.



Around 1969, Warwick Spinks was caught on secret camera offering to supply a video in which a 10 year old boy was killed and another featuring the horrific abuse of a young boy.

The untouchable "Warwick Spinks ... built businesses and bought properties in South Africa, Namibia, Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Switzerland, France and England..."

WARWICK SPINKS

In the early 1970's, soldier John Peters, who helped make the 'Bjorn tape' video involving the horrific sex assault of an 8 year old boy, managed to go absent without leave.

PEDOPHILE RING IN PRIME MINISTER'S HOME?

In the 1970's and 1980's, pedophile rings for top people were operating in children's care homes in Islington in London.

This happened "under the watch of Margaret Hodge", the Islington politician who is a friend of Tony Blair.

In the 1970's, Sir Jimmy Savile becomes a regular visitor to the Haut de La Garenne children's care home on the child abuse island of Jersey.

In 1970 there was the first recorded instance of child abuse by Sir Jimmy Savile at Duncroft school in Surrey.




In 1970, Edward Heath, who was a frequent visitor to the child abuse island of Jersey, became Prime Minister.




In 1971, Claire McAlpine, who had been a young dancer on BBC TV,committed suicide at the age of 15.

In her diary she named showbusiness personalities whom she claimed had "used" her.

The allegations were dismissed by the police and by the BBC, and Jimmy Savile denied having known her.



In 1972, Father Bruce Ritter, a vice president of Americares, set up a charity called Covenant House, 'as a cover for a pedophile ring'.

Cia's 'Christian' faction; AmeriCares, pedophile rings.

In 1973, Michael Trestrail, linked to Elm Guest House, became the Queen's bodyguard.

From 1973 - 1982, Children from Grafton Close Children's Home were being abused at the Elm guest house by top people.

PEDOPHILE RINGS; NAYPIC.



 ENEMIES OF THE PEOPLE.

From 1974 - 1990, child abuse rings were operating at various children's homes in North wales.

Margaret Thatcher's close friend Sir Peter Morrison, and a McAlpine, were reportedly involved.

In the mid 1970's, the Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE) was active in promoting the idea of legalising sex with children over 4.

PIE was financed and organised by people linked to the security services, reportedly.

In 1975, Prince Edward served as President of The Scout Association.


In 1975, Project MKUltra was brought to public attention by the Church Committee of the U.S. Congress.

In 1975, Jimmy Savile made a 10 day 'state visit' to Israel.

He met President Ephraim Katzir and Jerusalem mayor Teddy Kollek, and was organised by John Levy of the Friends of Israel Educational Trust.

In 1975, Sir Jimmy Savile reportedly beat and raped a girl at Stoke Mandeville hospital as part of a satanic ritual with other adults in the hospital basement.

He chanted 'Hail Satan' in Latin.

http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/370...f-satanic-ring


Savile and Thatcher. Jimmy Savile spent several Christmases at Margaret Thatcher's home.

From 1975 - 1980, we had 'the Yorkshire Ripper murder spree'.

Jimmy Savile was viewed as a suspect in the Ripper murders and was questioned by West Yorkshire Police.

Moulds were taken of his teeth.

In 1976, Jimmy Savile, at Haut de La Garenne on the child abuse island of Jersey, sexually abused ''John'' who was aged 10 at time of assault.

Two top police officers officers have claimed that Jersey's Haut de la Garenne care home was at the centre of a ''well-protected paedophile ring''.


Thais

From 1975 until 1976, Francis D Shelden owned North Fox Island, in Lake Michigan.

The island was a major centre of child abuse activity.



Reportedly, Shelden is actually Frank Torey, the editor of Spartacus and PAN (see photo) along with John Stamford.

http://catherinebroad.wordpress.com/...circa-1975-76/

The Oakland County Child Killer is an unidentified serial killer responsible for the murders of four or more children, two girls and two boys, in Oakland County, Michigan, United States in 1976 and 1977.

It has been alleged that Frank Shelden/FrankTorey was the killer.

Oakland County Child Killer.
In 1976, Jimmy Savile was in Belfast, the site of the Kincora Boy's Home brothel, and several mysterious killings of children..


Innocent Thais.

In 1976, John Hugh Wetterer, a Vietnam War veteran, founded an orphanage in Guatemala City called Mi Casa.

According to reports, it becomes a centre of child abuse.

JOHN WETTERER, GEORGE BUSH, CHILD ABUSE IN Guatemala. / Cia's 'Christian' faction; AmeriCares, pedophile rings.



In 1977, in London, Peter Righton, and other members of P.I.E., began sexually abusing an 11-year-old boy.

The abuse continued for several years.

Sir Cyril Smith and other VIPs were allegedly involved.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news...ophile-1815932

From 1979-81, an 11-year-old called Vincent was being abused at Elm Guest house and at a house in notorious Bexhill.

In 1979, Margaret Thatcher became UK Prime Minister.



In 1979, Martin Allen, 15, disappeared.

He was last seen by a friend at King’s Cross Tube station as he made his way home from school.

A man and boy were seen acting suspiciously at Earl's Court, just a few miles from Elm Guest House.

A photofit of the man 'bears a remarkable resemblance to Harvey Proctor'.

http://ukpaedos-exposed.com/cold-cas...n-london-1979/

~~~~~~~~~~~~

The Real Reason Why Germany Halted Its Gold Repatriation From The NY Fed.



Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, 15 November 2022

DAILY MAIL EXPLAINS 9 11


Tony Rennell, in the UK's Daily Mail, 6th August 2005, wrote:

"Towers that fell 'like a controlled demolition'. Planes that vanished then mysteriously reappeared. And crucial evidence that has been lost for ever. A new book raises bizarre yet deeply unsettling questions about the world’s worst terror atrocity….."

The book being reviewed by Rennell:

9/11 Revealed: Challenging The Facts Behind The War On Terror, by Ian Henshall and Rowland Morgan, published by Robinson at £8.99.

The review:

The plot by America’s military bosses was devilish in both design and intent – to fabricate an outrage against innocent civilians, fool the world and provide a pretext for war.

In the pentagon, a top secret team drew up a plan to simultaneously send up two airliners painted and numbered exactly the same, one from a civil airport in America, the other from a secret military airbase nearby.

The one from the airport would have military personnel on board who had checked in as ordinary passengers under false names. The one from the airbase would be an empty drone, a remote-controlled unmanned aircraft.

Somewhere along their joint flight paths, the passenger-carrying plane would drop below radar height, and disappear, landing back at the airbase and unloading its occupants in secret.

Meanwhile, the drone would have taken up the other plane’s designated course. High over the island of Cuba, it would be exploded in mid-air after broadcasting an international distress call that it was under attack from enemy fighters.

The world would be told that a plane load of blameless American holidaymakers had been deliberately shot down by Fidel Castro’s Communists – and that the US had no choice but to declare war and topple his regime.


This ‘agent provocateur’ plan – code named OPERATION NORTHWOODS and revealed in official archives – dates from 1962 when the Cold War was at its height.

Four decades later, there are a growing number of people who look back at this proto-conspiracy and then to the events of 9/11 and see uncanny and frightening modern parallels.

For Cuba, read Iraq, say these skeptics. For the dummy airliner, read the Twin Towers in New York.

The Northwoods plan is crucial to the argument presented in a hugely provocative – many would say fantastical – yet, at times, genuinely disturbing new analysis of 9/11 by two radical British based journalists, Ian Henshall and Rowland Morgan.

In it, they examine various conspiracy theories that suggest the Bush administration connived in the devastating aerial attacks on New York and Washington four years ago. The reason? To give Bush the excuse he wanted to push ahead with his secret, long-held plane to invade Iraq and capture its oilfields...

Much of evidence the authors present is undeniably compelling – and their arguments sound rather less preposterous in the light of OPERATION NORTHWOODS all those years ago.

That plan was proposed in all seriousness by America’s Joint Chiefs of Staff in a memo to the Secretary of Defence. It got as far as the Attorney General – Robert Kennedy, brother of the president, John Kennedy, before being vetoed.

It is proof, says Henshall and Morgan, that forces at the top of the US Government are capable of conceiving a deadly, devious and fraudulent plan to further their own secret ends – even under such a supposedly ‘nice guy’ president as JFK.

In which case, can the idea of a 9/11 plot by those who serve the deeply mistrusted Bush really be ruled out with total certainty, without at least considering the arguments?


Of course, the official explanation for 9/11 is that Al Qaeda just got lucky that sunny morning in September 2001. The terrorists conducted their attacks without outside help, by this account, and intelligence and other blunders by the US authorities that contributed to their terrible success – for example, ignored warnings that an attack involving aeroplanes was likely, or issuing US entry visas to 19 Islamic fanatics set on murder – were just that: blunders.

This is the White House’s version and it was endorsed by a Washington commission of inquiry under Thomas Kean published last year.

But, according to Henshall and Morgan, the story is full of gaping holes and unanswered questions.

And the most startling question, which remains unresolved, they say, is why the hijackers’ principal target, the two 110-storey towers at the World Trade Centre in New York crumbled so easily. No-one who watched each building suddenly cascade into dust and debris in just 20 seconds will ever forget the slow-motion horror.

But now the question is asked: was it all too pat, too neat?

Though 30 years old, the towers had expressly been built to survive the impact of a Boeing 707, a plane the same size and carrying as much fuel as the ones that struck.

That they collapsed after being hit and fell at such speed was unprecedented in the history of architecture.

It astonished many engineers.

The official explanation is known as the Pancake Effect – steel supports melting in the intense fireball, causing the floors to tumble down on each other.

The problem here is that the heat from the explosions was probably not nearly as great as people tend to assume.

There was indeed a lot of kerosene from the aircraft fuel tanks when flight 11 from Boston hit the North Tower between the 94th and the 98th floors but pictures show that most of this fireballed outwards.

Experts have questioned whether the fire ever got hot enough to melt the buildings’ steel frames.

Oddly, too, original estimates by firefighters after the second plane, Flight 175, hit the South Tower, were that the blaze was containable.

Two firefighters actually reached the crash zone on the 78th floor and a tape exists of them radioing down that just two hoses would be enough to get the fire under control – in which case the situation should have been little different from a ‘normal’ office fire, and no steel tower ever collapsed as the result of such a blaze.

‘The fire wasn’t hot enough to cause a collapse’ Kevin R Ryan, laboratory director at a US underwriting firm specializing in product safety, was sacked from his job last year after questioning the official explanation.

“The buildings should have easily withstood the thermal stress caused by the burning jet fuel”, he said. “If steel did soften or melt, this was certainly not due to jet fuel fires of any kind, let alone the briefly burning fires in those towers. That fact should be of great concern to all Americans.”


Intriguingly, Ryan claimed that his firm had checked and approved the steel used in the towers when they were built. This was later vehemently denied by the bosses who sacked him.

To add to the mystery, the tape of the two firemen was kept secret and when relatives were finally allowed to listen to it, they had to sign strict confidentiality agreements.

If the Pancake Effect theory is wrong, there’s one obvious alternative: that the towers were brought down by the sheer impact of the planes hitting them. But this, according to the skeptics, ignores basic physics. The initial hit on the North Tower, for example, destroyed 33 of the 59 columns in its north face. This meant the damage was asymmetrical, so any resulting collapse would surely have been lopsided. In fact, the building fell evenly.

The TV aerial on the summit sank vertically, in a straight line.

There were other strange anomalies. According to the Kean Commission, when the first plane struck: ‘A jet fuel fireball erupted and shot down a bank of elevators, bursting into numerous lower floors, including the lobby level, and the basement four storeys below ground.’ Unlikely, say Henshall and Morgan.

A film by a French documentary crew, who by chance were following a New York firefighting team that day, shows the first men arriving. The lobby was covered in fine debris and the windows were shattered but there was none of the soot or oily residue that burning jet fuel would have left behind.

Meanwhile down in the basement, a 50-ton hydraulic press was reduced to rubble and a steel and concrete fire door demolished. Witnesses there said the destruction was less like that from a fireball flash and more like that from a bomb.

Some firefighters told reporters that day that they thought there had been bombs in the building – before apparently being silenced by their chiefs.

Atta chose to learn to fly at a Venice Florida airfield long used for CIA operations.

So had Al Qaeda cleverly placed explosives inside the towers as well as attacking them from the air? Or, as conspiracy theorists would have it, had some homegrown agency mined the towers to make sure they fell – but neatly without collapsing over the rest of Manhattan, America’s financial and business heartland?

The authors quote an expert demolition contractor from Pennsylvania, Michael Taylor, who said the fall of the buildings ‘looked like a controlled demolition’.

Another expert, Van Romero, vice-president for research at the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, reached the same opinion after studying videos of the disaster, and concluded that ‘explosive devices inside the buildings’ caused them to collapse.

Strangely and without explanation, he recanted that view just ten days after going public with it. Might he possibly have been leaned on?

Even stranger, say Henshall and Morgan, was the collapse of a third building on the World Trade Centre site, a smaller 47-storey block known as WTC7, which was largely ignored by the world’s media.

It had not been hit by a plane yet it, too, mysteriously fell many hours after the Towers had gone. The official explanation for this was that fuel stores caught fire as a result of debris from the burning towers, the building began to bulge in one corner, and after that it was unsalvageable. But remember that, according to Henshall and Morgan, a steel-framed building had never collapsed as a result of a fire before this day. And, again according to the authors, WTC7 appears almost untouched by fire in photographs taken at the time.

The landlord of the World Trade Centre site, Larry Silverstein, explicitly suggested at one point that WTC7 was deliberately demolished. He told a US TV documentary that a decision was taken to ‘pull’ the building rather than risk loss of life, though this was later denied.

Certainly, according to Henshall and Morgan, the building’s fall in seven seconds was just as textbook-tidy and suspicious as the collapse of the Twin Towers. Given that it also housed offices of the US Secret Service, the CIA and the Defence Department, this has led conspiracy theorists to give it a key role in the supposed 9/11 plot – as we will see shortly.

Part of the whole problem, according to Henshall and Morgan, is that vital evidence about what happened was destroyed or muddied in the wake of the atrocity.
One expert said there were bombs inside the towers.





Ground Zero, the base of the towers, was fiercely protected by the authorities – understandably so because it not only contained human remains but a cache of seized drugs held in an FBI office and more than $1 billion of gold from bank vaults in the Buildings. Yet what went on behind all the heavy security?

After most air disasters, the wreckage of the planes is meticulously gathered up and pieced together in search of clues. Extraordinarily, in the course of removing the rubble from the Twin Towers to a nearby landfill site, the 9/11 salvage operation seems to have ‘lost’ four six-ton aircraft engines, besides failing to find the ‘black box’ flight data recorders and cockpit voice recorders from either of the planes.

These data boxes – which could have revealed exactly what happened in the doomed jets – are deliberately designed to withstand heavy impacts and exceptionally high temperatures. It is, according to experts, very rare for them not to be recovered after an accident.

Unfortunately, according Henshall and Morgan, there was a singular lack of official zeal even to establish the very basic fact that the aircraft that hit the Twin Towers were the same as those that took off from Boston.

Perhaps, with almost the entire world watching the attacks on TV, it hardly seemed necessary to prove the glaringly obvious. But this failure to follow standard procedures for accident investigation once again gave encouragement to the conspiracy theorists.

And then there was the oddity of the single passport. The black boxes may have been destroyed and steel girders melted – yet somehow one of the hijackers’ passports avoided this inferno and was found intact in a nearby street by ‘a passer-by’.

To Henshall and Morgan, that seems absurd, as does the almost instant identification of this person as a hijacker rather than a passenger or a Twin Towers office worker.

Conspiracy theorists suspect the passport was planted to help establish the official story in the first, critical hours after the disaster.

Why didn't fighter planes intercept the hijackers?

Still more unanswered questions surround what happened at the Pentagon in Washington, in the third successful terrorist attack that day.

After taking off from Dulles Airport, Washington, American Airlines Flight 77 dropped off the radar screens for 36 minutes when its transponders sending signals back to air traffic control were switched off.

When the blip reappeared, it was closing on the city but where precisely the aircraft had been for the past half an hour was a mystery. Nor could anyone in air traffic control figure out what it was.

Experienced officials apparently watched its speed and maneuverability and thought it must be a military plane.

Conspiracy theorists maintain this is precisely what it was.

In a repeat of New York, no evidence has ever been produced from the wreckage to prove that it was Flight 77 that hurtled into the side of the Pentagon at 350mph. Photographs show that the hole it made was large enough for the fuselage of a Boeing 757 but not for the wings and the tail, though these supposedly disappeared through the gap and then vapourised.

For the conspiracy theorists, this points to a conclusion that what hit was not Flight 77, and not even a jetliner. Some witnesses claim the plane they say hit the Pentagon was a small one, an eight – or 12-seater, and that it did not have the roar of an airliner but the shrill whine of a fighter plane. One witness is convinced it was a missile.

The authors say the matter could be cleared up by CCTV footage of the crash from a nearby filling station, a hotel and traffic surveillance cameras.

There were plenty of Nazis in the USA in the 1930s.

Unfortunately, the FBI seized all three videos within minutes of the crash and they have never been released.

If they were produced, they might lay to rest the theory that what hit the Pentagon was a military drone painted in airline livery and that just before impact it fired a missile to enable a clean entry which would explain the lack of debris. But until they are, the skeptics will continue to have a field day.

In essence, to the extreme conspiracy theorists, what took place on 9/11 was a repeat of the aborted OPERATION NORTHWOODS.

Far from being an attack by Islamic terrorists, they say, the events were a complete hoax, a conjuring trick by the US government in just the same way that Kennedy’s generals wanted to fool the world over Cuba.

Planes were swapped, ‘drones’ slammed into the World Trade Centre (which was mined with explosives as well) and the Pentagon, and the identities of alleged hijackers from the Middle East were stolen or invented to put the blame on Al Qaeda.

Along with the ‘passengers’ who apparently boarded the planes, the ‘suicide hijackers’ are now either dead or living under different identities, just as the pentagon planned fro the military personnel it was going to use back in 1962.

The theory seizes on the fact that, like the plane that apparently hit the Pentagon, both Flight 11 and Flight 175 switched off their transponders on their way to the Twin Towers and disappeared from Radar screens.

According to the skeptics, this gave them time and opportunity to land at the handily located Griffiss Air Force Base, a Pentagon command center which also houses research laboratories into advanced computers and radar.

There, they were supposedly replaced by remote-controlled substitutes.

In technical terms, this is not as far fetched as it sounds.

The US military experimented with unmanned aircraft as far back as World War II and there have been successful jet models since. Well-connected conspirators, so the theory goes, would have little difficulty getting their hands on a system to fit in an airliner. The switch would supposedly be foolproof because, as we have seen, the aircraft in the ruins would not be properly identified.

Then there was the smaller building known as WTC7. It was the obvious point from which to run the New York end of the scam, guiding the planes into their target. Afterwards, of course, the evidence had to be destroyed, hence its demolition...

Bologna 1980 reportedly showed that agents of the CIA and NATO were prepared to kill innocent civilians.

An operation of such intricacy and complexity would require the co-operation – and the silence until death – of thousands of people. Everything we have read about the victims on the planes, and their heartbroken relatives, would be a carefully constructed sham...

Why ... were air traffic controllers so slow to report suspected hijackings to the military that day in breach of standard procedures, with the result that fighter planes arrived too late to intercept?

Flight controllers in four separate incidents were unaccountably slow to realize that something was wrong and alert the military authorities.

Even after one plane was definitely known to have been hijacked, they failed to respond promptly when others went missing. The air force scrambled from the wrong base. For some reason, too, when fighter planes eventually were scrambled to New York, they were from an airbase 150 miles away, rather than the much closer one in New Jersey. The Twin Towers were ablaze before they got there.

All the while the local TV channels were smoothly getting eye-in-the-sky helicopters into the air over the World Trade Centre. In the words of the authors: “Their routine mobilizations stand in stark contrast to the apparent impotence and indecisiveness of the $350-billion-a-year US military. Yet for all the shortcomings of the Federal Aviation Authority and the US Air Force that day, no-one was ever fired or reprimanded.

One explanation for this paralysis is that there was, as fate would have it, an air defence exercise going on in US airspace that same day, codenamed Vigilant Guardian. The air traffic controllers were confused by this, thinking the planes disappearing from their screens might be part of the exercise.

Coincidence? No say the 9/11 sceptics. This was exactly the sort of smokescreen operation that anyone wanting to make life easier for the hijackers would launch to paralyse any authorities that might get in the way. When the first evidence came that hijackings were taking place, traffic control officials wasted valuable time wondering whether or not this was part of the Vigilant Guardian exercise. Suck a smokescreen fits well with two types of government-inspired plot postulated by 9/11 sceptics – popularly known as ‘LIHOP’ and ‘MIHOP’.

Operation Gladio was CIA-NATO terrorism in Europe.

‘LIHOP’ – ‘Let It Happen On Purpose’ – holds that since the turn of the new century, radical right-wingers in Washington (the so-called neo-cons) had been keen to get a US military presence in the Middle East oilfields and were also desperate to do something about Al Qaeda, which had been targeting US interests overseas.When evidence came in of an impending terrorist attack, they decided to ignore it. They intended that it should succeed. It would act at the very least as a ‘wake-up’ call to their apathetic fellow countrymen and at best as an excuse for war. In the much the same way, some historians believe, President Roosevelt knew in advance from broken codes about the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbour in 1941 – but let it happen, at the cost of 2,400 lives, because he wanted an excuse to join World War II.

‘MIHOP” takes a step on from this – ‘Make it Happen On Purpose’. This theory has the same motivation but the active involvement of US agents. Planted in Al Qaeda, they helped organize the plot, or at the very least cleared a path for the hijackers.These agents may even have tried to keep down casualty figures, which some think were suspiciously small in the circumstances.

The plane that hit the Pentagon was seen to swerve at the last minute and hit an area of the building that was largely unoccupied – and which had just been fitted with reinforced external walls and blast-resistant windows.

A crash into the other side would have killed and maimed many thousands instead of just 125.

In New York, too, more than 50,000 inhabitants of the Towers were targeted but just 2,600 killed – not least because of the orderly way in which the buildings collapsed, after most of the occupants had been evacuated. Was this an example of a ‘managed’ atrocity?


According to Le Figaro and French radio, Osama stayed in an American hospital in Dubai just before 9 11.

For most observers, the idea of US involvement in the attacks still strains credulity beyond breaking point. Yet that catalogue of unanswered questions remains troubling.Some are very basic.

How, for example, did the hijackers manage to slip past airport security with weapons?...

How did the passengers make those phone calls?

Another problem here is those very phone calls from the planes. Experts in Henshall and Morgan’s book say it is all but impossible to make a mobile phone call above 8,000 feet – let alone four times that altitude, as the jet passengers are alleged to have done.

So how were these calls on which so much of the 9/11 narrative has been built ever made? Could they possibly have been invented?

The authors write: ‘Few issues cause as much controversy amongst 9/11 sceptics as these, not least because they were cited – by Tony Blair among others – as eyewitness reports and proof positive the official narrative was true.’

Doubts are even raised over the gung-ho story of Flight 93, the fourth plane in the attacks, which passengers apparently seized back from the hijackers, causing it to crash into a field but miss Washington.The legend of the heroic cockpit-storming, launched to cries of ‘Let’s Roll’, was a product of tapes that have never been authenticated or released to anyone other than the victims’ relatives, who were sworn to secrecy.

Henshall and Morgan say the matter could be cleared up if recordings or billing evidence from phone companies were produced but they never have been.This call for transparency is the thrust of their whole argument. It is time, they say, for a full and truly independent inquiry into 9/11 that will reveal all the facts and silence the rumours.

One thing it could consider would be the anthrax attack on America three weeks after 9/11. Five recipients of contaminated letters died, postal facilities were closed, as were office buildings on Capitol Hill where hundreds of lawmakers and staff were tested and given an antibiotic.

At the time, this was seized on by the Washington power-brokers pressing for action against Iraq. ‘Who but Saddam Hussein could have supplied Arab terrorists with anthrax,’ they asked.

By contrast, skeptics about 9/11 see this as this finishing touch to the grand plot – an attempt to distract attention from any doubts about the atrocities and the lessons to be learned from them.They may have a case. The letters mysteriously stopped and the anthrax spores were identified by scientists as a particular strain stemming only from the government’s own labs in Maryland.

But by then the scare had shut down congress at a crucial time, when questions about 9/11 were beginning to surface, and helped deepen the mood of fear and paranoia among ordinary Americans.It was those fears, say the skeptics, that Bush exploited to get his way on Iraq. Had he plotted it that way all along?

Henshall and Morgan raise enough awkward points to make it a thought that cannot simply be laughed out of court.

After all, Bush and Blair, took us to war assuring us that ‘the Iraq regime continues to possess some of the most lethal weapons ever devised’. Yet those weapons of mass destruction have not been found and many doubt they existed.

With public trust one of the major casualties of the war, can any of us be absolutely sure we have not been caught up in a lie and perhaps a bigger one even than we ever though possible?..

Henshall and Morgan ... have certainly left a whiff of something sinister in the air.

9/11 Revealed: Challenging The Facts Behind The War On Terror, by Ian Henshall and Rowland Morgan is published at £8.99.



Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,