Thursday, 12 November 2015


Why are so many people sexually attracted to 'deviant' personalities?

Why We Are Attracted to Deviant Personalities

Fernando Gutiérrez and his team, at the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, studied nearly 1,000 'heterosexual' men and women.

The research showed that people with 'pathological' personality types, such the neurotic and impulsive, had more mates and more children than average.

Both males and females who were impulsive, reckless and impetuous attracted more short-term partners than participants with average personalities.

The itinerant, gypsy lifestyles of impulsive people might put them in contact with a greater number of potential partners.

Many people are attracted to the impulsive and the risk-takers because they are considered brave, independent, self-reliant and 'captivating'.

Obsessive-compulsive males - but not females - were successful at securing long-lasting mates.

Obsessive-compulsive males tend to be serious, reliable, cautious and much richer than average.

Women believe that money means survival, safeness and resources for the children.

Neurotic females (instability, anxiousness and insecurity) were more likely to be in lasting relationships and more likely to have lots of children.

Some men may see high levels of neurotic emotionality in a woman as a sign of femininity.

Why We Are Attracted to Deviant Personalities


  1. Israel continues to attack the Syrian Government and their allies in Syria, risking a major war, even nuclear war with Russia. .

  2. another bogus research....

  3. Gypsy sex?

    Whatever happened to cheap, meaningless sex, is that VERBOTEN?

    Damn world is coming apart at the seams, bitching about matters that are minor while the Zionists and their Jew Overlords continue on with the rape and conquest of the ME and personal bank accounts.

  4. Might feel like skipping over, or through, this reader’s digest about what seems obvious and unavoidable but it strikes at the heart of everything we fight. The symptoms of the dark machinations of the ones and ways we true-truthseekers target. GK Chesterton sniffed aspects out of the realist of future dangers, that today’s public clever-clogs are still lost in a fog about. Or hiding behind the sofa and in a deception about what hope - if held - means. Or bought/or drugged up/or/or/or... just lost and lying. The least they could do would be to find another profession and shut-up in protest.

    A century ago The Times asked ‘What’s wrong with the world today?’ to which he replied; ‘Dear Sir, I am.Yours, G.K.Chesterton.’ This is one answer: human behavior. The was, is and always - just is. Other insights come from comparing the times, putting what variables we can in the mix but inevitably measuring and calling out the hidden-ish controllers. G.K. lived in a time, that of course had the attraction to deviance, rogues -to- mindless violent thugs, the plain, disgusting, nasty and the deceitful. Sure, sure... but to what extent, how widespread and deep? We all get G.K. but, oh... to escape the clutches, as long as it might take, and somehow grow-up into something better. (Its taken me longer than most - tentatively a bit more on track).

    I’ve heard one Mark Passio talk (‘what on earth is happening’ - it was on ‘Tap’) and he speaks of selfishness being the ‘satanic’ philosophy spread abroad. It lit my thinking. Of course we get the dripping, pouring into us, their seeking all to hate and destroy ourselves on-our-behalf - but how we should keep naming this plague and reclaim something different.

    I guess m’thought is, I’m beaten down (...but beatin’ back) about the small things, that even in my can be - and certainly tons been - wonky state, are important. I believe it’s the foundation of the definitely proper-negative side of; impulsive, reckless, impetuous - and symptoms of those pathologically challenged (?).

    Jesus said this. ‘You see it in the small things’. Here’s my nag: a returning email or phone call, a commitment met, can be the... smallest thing. This might not make a jot of particular difference in the individual instance but this, in our socially media savvy giant-lab, is the one to watch. It’s so widespread (- is there a bigger word?) that all awake, should be thoroughly counter-culture, subversive, rebel warriors and - cut it out.

    I’m somewhat moving the goal posts here but I reckon being a romantic manipulator which, at the least troubling end is abuse-lite, is all about the pop. non-commitment to a care which is somewhat irrespective of who and why.

    They/them, want us to be dull and dreary or tricky and brash to extremes. Override temperament bias and diminish contrasts within. One or ‘tuther. Wimp or wonderwo/man. Makes me sick. Not romantically, but I’ve spent all too-many years ligging with different toughies. Eventually you realise the sham. Like so-called gangster-rap, it was made up and is promoted in the boardrooms by suits. The dupers have been been duped (or I should write ‘doped’).

    I get the sense of guilt we can have but surely non-NWO compliance is all about not letting them redefine and corrupt our common civility and... love.