Saturday, 10 February 2024

Decadence of Weimar Germany - 1919-1933

Decadence?
Gay Nazis?
Decadence?
Gay Nazi.

The Taoists would say - avoid the extremes?

Moses caused a lot of problems?

Angelina commented -

The Decadence of Weimar Germany - 1919-1933

The decay of moral values in all areas of life 

Germany's Weimar Republic (1919-1933) 

No account of can be complete without some mention of the tidal wave of sexual immorality that was to engulf the country during the period of the Weimar Republic (1919-1933) following World War One. 

The Cultural Takeover of Germany 

Dr Karl Wiehe is painstaking in the details he provides:

Well before 1933 certain people had taken possession of the film industry even more thoroughly than of the theater. That was understandable, because the earnings in the film industry overshadow the earnings of any other artistic activity….

The biggest step in the direction of the decline of the German cultural life [however] was taken in the field of the light entertainment genre. Here—in the genre of musical comedy and above all in revue and burlesque—frivolity and lasciviousness were to rear their ugly heads. So much so that during these years Berlin was quite correctly considered the most immoral city in the world.

The sexologists Ivan Bloch and Magnus Hirschfeld became the representatives of “sex research” camouflaged as science—a bogus science that was merely an excuse for pornography and propaganda designed to destroy the institute of marriage and the sanctity of the family. 

Wiehe provides the following useful facts and statistics:

A cursory survey of the film titles, Wiehe tells us, : “Moral und Sinnlichkeit” (Morals and Sensuality); “Was kostet Liebe?” (What is the Price of Love); “Wenn ein Weib den Weg verliert” (When a Woman loses her Way); “Prostitution” (Prostitution); “Sündige Mutter” (Sinful Mama); “Das Buch des Lasters” (The Book of Vices).

Light entertainment - The revue theaters, all concentrated within great cities such as Berlin - Shows consisted of little more than excuses for sexual titillation involving the display of the female form. 

~~~

Angelina commented 
Conclusion: Weimar Germany as a Dress-rehearsal for the Subsequent Sexual Revolution of the 1960s

My own impression, though I could well be mistaken here, is that Weimar Germany can be seen as a trial run or dress rehearsal for the Sexual Revolution of the 1960s, a revolution in attitudes and behavior that was to convulse America and then spread like a moral virus to Europe and the rest of the world.

Recollect that it was in Germany during the Weimar period—in 1923 to be exact—that the Institut für Sozialforschung was set up at the University of Frankfurt. Financed by the Argentian Jew Felix Weil, this was later to become the infamous Frankfurt School

The formula is simple: destroy the belief system on which that society is founded, especially its religion and its traditional codes of honor and decency. Promote godlessness and a philosophy of despair. To put it in even plainer language: reduce men to beasts if you wish to control them.

It was George Lukács 25, one of the founding fathers of the Frankfurt School, who had called for “a culture of pessimism and a world abandoned by God.”  And it was one of their most fanatical ideologues, Willi Munzenberg 27, who had said he wanted to turn the world upside down and make life a hell on earth. His exact words:

We must organize the intellectuals and use them to make Western civilization stink! Only then, after they have corrupted all its values and made life impossible, can we impose the dictatorship of the proletariat... 

In America, they would use multiculturalism as a weapon of mass destruction in addition to moral corruption. They would flood the country with immigrants, legal as well as illegal. They would turn race against race (engineered ethnic conflict), parent against child (attack on authority), and man against woman (radical feminism). Above all, they would teach the non-White races to regard the White race as the ultimate evil: “the cancer of human history”, to quote Jewish feminist Susan Sontag. 29

The above comments are admittedly controversial and will elicit anger in many quarters. For this I apologize. My purpose is simply to give voice to an urgent and widespread perception. Not to be able to say what many people increasingly believe is clearly undesirable.

6 Comments:

At 10 February 2024 at 11:25 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

The NSDAP has been alternately accused by Zionist historians of both extreme homosexuality and extreme homophobia. This shows, if anything, that Jews and Gentiles – not Aryans – are the ones most hung up over sexual preferences. Any intelligent appraisal of Hitler’s political manoeuvres accounts for the alleged ”anti-homosexuality” of National Socialist Germany as solely a tactical excuse to deal with traitor Ernst Roehm and his faction. As a matter of fact, none of the anti-homosexual laws used to attack Roehm’s faction were instituted by the NSDAP, but all already existed during the Weimar era and earlier, whereas from 1935 onwards (the year after Roehm’s faction was dealt with) these laws began to be loosened, starting with removing the term “unnatural” from the official description of homosexuality. Homosexuals loyal to Hitler experienced no persecution, and many (e.g. Gustaf Grundgens) were promoted to high prestige. It is, however, also baseless to claim that Hitler actively preferred to recruit homosexuals; Roehm probably had such a preference, but Hitler simply kept those who were good National Socialists. Quality of character and strength of ideology in his followers were what mattered to Hitler, not their sexual preferences, in his own words: “What people do in their beds do not concern me so long as relationships do not prejudice the State and its leadership.”

Formalization of sexual preferences into the tunnel-visioned classification of so-called “sexual orientation” is actually a dichotomy originating in Judaism via the explicit prohibition of same-gender sexual relations in Mosaic Law. Authentic National Socialism, which by definition seeks to de-Judaize culture, logically cannot subscribe to the Mosaic perspective, but opposes it. It is Judaism which should be held fundamentally responsible for the thousands of years of cruel homophobia from the time of Moses onwards wherever the Tanakh has been culturally influential, as well as for the postmodern overreaction of “gay pride” that has deliberately conflated homosexuality with promiscuity and debauchery (which is by no coincidence how the Tanakh negatively stereotyped homosexuals as a whole) and thus predictably revived homophobia in the 21st century, all part of the Zionist agenda to divide society.

 
At 10 February 2024 at 11:43 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

CONTROLLED OPPOSITION !THAT GUY IN THE PICTURE WAS A SHILL AND JEWISH < HIS SEXUAL ORIENTATION IRRELEVANT >>>IF TRUE ...<
ONLY USEFUL FOR THE ONES THAT WANT TO DIVIDE AND WEAKEN THE NATIONS < THE NATIONAL FRONT MOST PROBABLY WAS CREATED BY THE INTELLIGENCE SERVICES "Neo-Nazi" quits movement, opens up about Jewish heritage and comes out as gay https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kIhvZjwOb3k

 
At 10 February 2024 at 12:06 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

THE MYTH OF A NAZI EXTERMINATION OF HOMOSEXUALS
By Jack Wikoff
https://www.jrbooksonline.com/cwporter/homo.htm

 
At 10 February 2024 at 13:05 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Beasts....Goyim. In court and depositions amidst consecutive lawsuits, "they" described me as an intellect beneath a rooster's brain as in "Dr. D doesn't understand cause and effect because even a rooster knows his crowing doesn't cause the sunrise."
We are collectively and globally in a very dark place, but no Catholic, Mormon, 7th Day Adventist or Mennonite ever called me 'rooster-brain'.

 
At 10 February 2024 at 18:25 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

So glad you published on this topic. The Havaara Agreement was made into a book called the Transfer Agreement. Well researched by the Jewish author whose parents at the time disowned him. It reveals how Rothschild wanted to create a home for the Jews - this became Reformist Judaism (Zionism). The belief ran contrary to Orthodox Judaism - those who believed that a Jewish settlement could only occur after the real Jewish Messiah arrived. Not before. Zionist said a settlement (now Israel) was in accordance with Judaism. The schism began then & remains in 2024. Hitler formed an alliance with the Zionists who had told him they would support his Nationalist Socialist movement. The also said they would not support the other Jews boycott of German goods. Hitler agreed to an alliance.. hence the NA ZI party. Nationalist Alliance with Zionists. Large numbers of Jews transferred to what is now Israel but then was the settlement created by Balfour in 1917. By 1933 those Orthodox Jews who did NOT want to go to a settlement as it went against their belief that could only happen after their Messiah came - became the enemy of Zionists. A dedicated movement began with Zionists approving the incarceration of the (well off with mansions) Orthodox German Jews in prison camps unless they would agree to follow Zionist principals and move to 'Israel'. A medal coin was struck to celebrate the agreement of Nazi & Zionists with the Nazi symbol on one side & the Jewish Star on the other. Secret negotiations Hitler with Zionists in 1933 - video here: https://www.facebook.com/noel.kreutzmann.9/videos/406271275276799 Other links https://concisepolitics.com/2017/10/03/secret-relationship-between-nazism-and-zionism/?fbclid=IwAR3Rtx5IUGHNQGhyi6q8glltKh0eS1A6nnqxhoAQTa3Wb-3QF1QOr9XpZr4

 
At 10 February 2024 at 23:26 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

traditionally homosexuality was considered lert wing
rothschild chose all his disciples from left leaning homosexuals several with convictions against boys
Victot rothschilds words are as true today as in the 1930s
communism will come to the world on the back of homosexualoity
just look at the LBGT indoctrination of our kids in schools

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home