Thursday 26 December 2019

Nuclear destruction of the WTC on 9 11



At 27 December 2019 at 06:40 , Anonymous Brabantian said...

Although I used to be inclined toward this version of the 9-11 towers demolition, '9-11 nukes' also upheld by Veterans Today (which admits to publishing 30-40% false stories as the price of not being shut down by US authorities)

Now I see '9-11 nukes' as in error, in part because I have become convinced by the evidence that nuclear weapons are themselves a hoax, and have never existed, with Hiroshima & Nagasaki being chemical firebombings like Tokyo & Dresden

There are five major 9-11 narratives

(1) Official story, planes, jet fuel, etc - Denounced as impossible by thousands of architects & engineers
(2) Conventional pre-set explosives, linked to the 'Israeli art students' photographed by the New York Times, with boxes whose industrial codes showed them to be bomb detonator components (my vote now)
(3) Nano-thermite advanced explosives
(4) Destructive energy rays which the government can use from a distance
(5) 1950s-60s recycled 'mini nuclear weapons' detonated inside the towers, as suggested above

The major harms to people said to be from 'nukes' can also be ascribed to massive conventional explosives, combined with chemicals on-site (air conditioning etc) or brought in, and perhaps also combined with nuclear waste from nuclear power plants also brought in


Re nuclear weapons, I see this as idea-terrorism to replace 'no hope eternal hell' terrors of Christianity & Islam. Consider:

- The 'smoking gun' proving Hiroshima was fake, 1945 US military records, logging 66 aeroplanes as 'chemically fire-bombing Imabari, Japan', close to Hiroshima, same date & hour as alleged 'atomic bomb' ... Imabari no longer existed, destroyed in 2 previous raids ... this was the fleet that fire-bombed Hiroshima

- Swedish nuclear engineer Anders Björkman, argued in detail for years that nuclear weapons are impossible, fake, & have never existed (versus nuclear power, which does work)

- German Jesuit Rev John Siemes, eye-witness in Hiroshima, documented local witnesses reporting planes spreading incendiary material

- US military Major Alexander de Seversky, surveying Japanese cities shortly afterwards, found wooden-house-burned Hiroshima to show no signs at all of anything other than chemical fire-bombing, just like Tokyo, Yokohama & Osaka ... central iron-steel buildings were intact, fragile objects undamaged, even flag poles still up beneath 'ground zero' ... no spot where things had been 'vapourised'

- At the time there 'death penalty for unauthorised speaking', suppression of Japanese & USA witnesses & involved persons

- 'Mushroom clouds' are from chemical explosions, falsely marketed as 'nuclear weapon signature'

- 1990 medical study on 40 years of Hiroshima & Nagasaki survivors, showed no genetic damage as typical from high radiation

At 27 December 2019 at 12:20 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

As an observer, "Live" TV images reveal composite videos, where a burning tower is overlaid on a NY Background.
Pitily there's a BBC reporter that said - live - about the falling WTC-7 before it happened.
As a researcher, there are the testimonies of the NY Firefighters - official, downloadable text - that say under swear how they heard many explosions and how they saw many puffs coming out of the towers in a military perfect fashion. Add the stock manipulations to all of that and the crazy muslims with boxcutters option is plainly wrong.
The dancing israelis on the Urban Moving Systems van, cheering and recording the aftermath, may point to the real conspirators. Do not forget that NORAD had a drill that day. A drill about hijacked planes.

At 27 December 2019 at 16:52 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Advanced Weaponry - Courtesy of Nikola Tesla.

At 28 December 2019 at 20:22 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

I like this guy's version better.

At 28 December 2019 at 21:33 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

At 29 December 2019 at 07:36 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

You may be surprised to find that Tesla was a fiction created by people wishing to mislead the Free Energy Movement- Tesla never Existed but the Tartarian Technology does,cheers

At 29 December 2019 at 22:31 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

(failed loading, try again)

Hullo Aang,

I no longer write this off. Have you visited this site? Perhaps I got the link off you, I can't recall.

Sadly, the site is as disorganised and chaotic as Judy Woods' old site was. Unfortunate. It's also curious that no one links to this stuff and I didn't come across it until... wow, 18 years of following trail after trail. Anyway, as theories for 911 go it qualifies as the red headed stepchild. Compare that to the number (not to mention dodginess) of the horde of arseholes pushing the no-plane theory. Wherever you turned there they were. This story? Nope.

That aside, the thing about the nukes/neutron destruction theory is that, unlike the aforementioned no-plane bullshit, it's not an either-or equation. In fact a doubling up of the means of destruction is, in this case, perfectly logical. Given that 911 could not be permitted to fail, it would make perfect sense to use overlapping means of bringing the towers done. And in this spook world where everything is a two-fer, three-fer, etc, why not piggyback a weapons test on top of it all? If I was a wicked motherfucker I would. Real time data, damage assessments, victim and mortality rates: brilliant.

Not forgetting, of course, the confusion sowed in any following investigations on account of evidence leading in multiple directions - sort of like a murder mystery that has too many suspects.

Further, in the vein of the above-cited evidence of no nukes at Hiroshima (and without endorsing it), how to explain all the cars close to the WTC site the metal of which was severely burnt and rusted to an impossible degree whilst papers, plastics, and soft furnishings in the cars were untouched? How is that possible in an explanation that pivots on heat and kinetic energy? It's too weird for itself.

I keep an open mind.

best etc etc

At 30 December 2019 at 09:00 , Anonymous Howard Ratcliffe said...

At 31 December 2021 at 13:52 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Nah ..

At 31 December 2021 at 14:13 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

There were still many anxious moments for the conspirators, who planned to launch a new reign of terror throughout the world. Japan had been suing for peace. Each day it seemed less likely that she could stay in the war. On March 9 and 10, 1945, 325 B-29s had burned thirty-five square miles of Tokyo, leaving more than one hundred thousand Japanese dead in the ensuing firestorm. Of Japan's 66 biggest cities, 59 had been mostly destroyed. 178 square miles of urban dwellings had been burned, 500,000 died in the fires, and now twenty million Japanese were homeless. Only four cities had not been destroyed; Hiroshima, Kokura, Niigata, and Nagasaki. Their inhabitants had no inkling that they had been saved as target cities for the experimental atomic bomb. Maj. Gen. Leslie Groves, at Bernard Baruch's insistence, had demanded that Kyoto be the initial target of the bomb. Secretary of War Stimson objected, saying that as the ancient capital of Japan, the city of Kyoto had hundreds of historic wooden temples, and no military targets. The Jews wanted to destroy it precisely because of its great cultural importance to the Japanese people.
Carrington quotes Admiral William D. Leahy, p. 245, I Was There, McGraw Hill: "A large part of the Japanese Navy was already on the bottom of the sea. The combined Navy surface and air force action even by this time had forced Japan into a position that made her early surrender inevitable. None of us then knew the potentialities of the atomic bomb, but it was my opinion, and I urged it strongly on the Joint Chiefs, that no major land invasion of the Japanese mainland was necessary to win the war.
When the Air Force dropped the atomic bomb on Nagasaki, with William Laurence riding in the co-pilot's seat of the B-29, pretending to be Dr. Strangelove, here again the principal target was a Catholic church. P.93, The Fall Of Japan, by William Craig, Dial, NY, 1967, "the roof and masonry of the Catholic cathedral fell on the kneeling worshippers. All of them died." This church has now been rebuilt, and is a prominent feature of the Nagasaki tour.
Among world leaders who spoke out about the United States' use of atomic weapons in Japan, Mahatma Gandhi echoed the general climate of opinion. P.258, Hiroshima's Shadow: "The atomic bomb has deadened the finest feelings which have sustained mankind for ages. There used to be so-called laws of war which made it tolerable. Now we understand the naked truth. War knows no law except that of might. The atomic bomb brought an empty victory to the Allied armies. It has resulted for the time being in the soul of Japan being destroyed. What has happened to the soul of the destroying nation is yet too early to see. Truth needs to be repeated as long as there are men who do not believe it."
Memorial Day, 1998
Cast of Characters: The House of Rothschild; international bankers who made enormous profits during the nineteenth century, and used their money to take over governments.
Bernard Baruch: New York agent of the Rothschilds who at the turn of the century set up the tobacco trust, the copper trust and other trusts for the Rothschilds. He became the grey eminence of the United States atomic bomb program when his lackey, J. Robert Oppenheimner, became director of the Los Alamos bomb development, and when his Washington lackey, James F. Byrnes, advised Truman to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Albert Einstein; lifelong Zionist who initiated the United States' atomic bomb program with a personal letter to President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1939.


Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home