Sunday, 21 July 2019

MOON LANDING



The rock above is supposed to be a piece of moon rock, picked up from the moon by Neil Armstrong, Michael Collins and Edwin 'Buzz' Aldrin.

It was given was given to the Dutch during a global tour by the three apollo 11 astronauts.

Curators at Amsterdam's Rijksmuseum discovered that the rock was in fact petrified wood.

"It's a nondescript, pretty-much-worthless stone," said Frank Beunk, a geologist involved in the investigation.

Source

...

"The astronauts were removed from the ship moments before takeoff, flown to Nevada, where, a few days later, they broadcast the moon walk from the desert.

"People claimed to have seen Armstrong walking through a hotel lobby, a show girl on each arm. Aldrin was playing the slots. 

"They were then flown to Hawaii and put back inside the capsule after the splash down but before the cameras arrived."

How Stanley Kubrick Staged the Moon Landing - Paris Review




Murderous Nazis were the key people in NASA. 

More than 130 German scientists were employed on the design and production of the fake Apollo 11 Moon landing.

German scientists Wernher von Braun, Kurt Debus and Arthur Rudolph were Nazi war criminals, guilty of mass murder.

The shameful truth

The German rocket scientists were not nice people.

Dr Hubertus Strughold  used concentration camp detainees for high-altitude experiments - and filmed their excruciating deaths. 

Arthur Rudolph would hang slave labourers if they did not work hard enough. 

He later had a key role in the Apollo programme.

The shameful truth

...


..

...

....

...

15 comments:

  1. The only people who believe we went to the moon are those who haven't checked the mountains of available material that proves otherwise.

    The Americans didn't go. The Chinese didn't return and nobody else has been anywhere near it.

    I've attached an extremely interesting video. It is on for about 2 hours. I watched the first 50 minutes or so (last night). Absolutely terrific. Heavyweight analysis of the photography from experts in their fields who utterly destroy the fakery.

    The tools they use are logic, physics and industry expertise. A lot of the material also exposes mistakes that NASA made and how no explanation except fakery can be employed to rationalise many of the photos.

    Even if you could spare 20 or 30 minutes worth of viewing - you would capture the essence of NASAs lies, deception and fakery.

    Nobody has been to the moon.

    Nothing like pocketing a trillion dollars and building space models and fake rockets for a few billion.

    NASA spends 60 billion.

    1000 billion - 60 billion = 940 billion left over.

    Kerrrrrrrrccccchhhhing.

    https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL00XhNBsFk2ylVvtGKsoVr85dUtqC3WjF

    Peace to the humans.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. IS THIS THE "SKEPTICS
      ASSOCIATION"?
        I NEED YOUR
        HELP TO PROVE
        MY RAT ISN'T
        PSYCHIC.

      ---

      Hi Peace to the Humans Guy,

      It's nice how we had a lunar eclipse on the fiftieth anniversary. Saw it with my own eyes at night. A half moon.

      Anyway, I watched excerpts of the video you mention.

      Some of the points it makes are absurd. For example, talking about the radiation environment in space. Sure, the astronauts were temporarily exposed to higher levels of radiation. Didn't affect their ability to do their job; it's space, not Lake Karachay or ground zero at Bikini.

      As for the supposed photographic anomalies, I think the reasons are far more pedestrian. Looked like nit picking after cherry picking.

      Look at this 16mm film of the Lunar Rover Vehicle from the Apollo 16 mission in 1972. Does it look fake?

      Did we put stuff on the moon at all?

      The evidence is pretty incontrovertible that we did.

      Eventually, you may be able to see the landers and buggies through an optical telescope even from the Earth: synthetic aperture optics with signal processing to remove atmospheric turblence.

      Did people walk on the moon?

      That's harder to prove. But if we can put stuff on the moon, we can put people on the moon. Sure, more oxygen, less Gs.

      Nonetheless it's good people are skeptical. Especially these days when do much of our "truth" comes from screens.

      The search for truth is one of the fundamental human drives. Essential to our survival.

      Rational skepticism hones your analytical abilities. Even extreme skepticism. Even of your own reality.

      But, really, what is real?

      Is our reality real?

      And if not, what is beyond our reality? Beyond this life?

      ---
      Hello.
        Um, is this the Bell residence?
      This is the Bell residence. Could you call back, there's something wrong with the picture.
        I'm trying to reach Tess Bell.

      ---


      Eventually, maybe, we will create simulated beings in simulated worlds --- copyable programs --- perfectly realistic, in their little worlds, living their lives, viewing their screens. What then is real to them?

      We may also create beings of such preternatural reason that they can, through the traces we leave on their worlds, infer our existence. Like looking into deepest space to infer the origins of the universe, they will look deep into their conscious reality.

      They will see us. Then look past us. Seeking the face of God.

      Delete
    2. Thank you for your comments regarding this controversial and polarizing topic.

      Firstly: IS THIS THE "SKEPTICS
      ASSOCIATION"?
        I NEED YOUR
        HELP TO PROVE
        MY RAT ISN'T
        PSYCHIC.

      At this moment in time it is not possible to determine whether or not your rat is psychic. Although, the likelihood of it being psychic is statistically much higher than a bunch of Nazis and lying Freemasons going to the moon.

      Secondly: "Look at this 16mm film of the Lunar Rover Vehicle from the Apollo 16 mission in 1972. Does it look fake?"

      In short, yes it looks like a pile of utter tripe. It looks so fake it's horrible.

      Having watched the painfully bad Hollywood B movie that you offered as 'incontrovertible proof', it turns out to be childlike fakery and not worth the 16mm film it has been printed on.

      Thirdly: "Did people walk on the moon?"

      "That's harder to prove. But if we can put stuff on the moon, we can put people on the moon. Sure, more oxygen, less Gs"

      You offered 'incontrovertible proof' in the previous paragraph that we had indeed been on the moon.

      Oddly enough, one paragraph later and you seem to have forgotten about your incontrovertible proof and are now unsure (by your own admissions). You now suggest that it is 'harder to prove'.

      The only thing that is easy to prove is that the (N)ational (A)ssociation of (S)pace (A)ctors NASA went absolutely no where and will never get there either.

      Lie after lie after lie. Any suggestion as to why the moon rock given to the Rijks was also fake? (Purely rhetorical).

      I will leave you with these words from Werner Von Brauns gravestone:

      Psalm 19:1: "The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork."

      THE FIRMAMENT.................

      Peace to the humans.





      Delete
    3. Bru said that he wanted to go back to Yosemite like last year. Last year we went to Flat Rock, not Yosemite. I don't think there's any cosmic significance in that.
      ---

      Hi Peace to the Humans Guy,

      I didn't offer the 16mm film as incontrovertible proof. I was talking about the laser retroreflectors that were left on the surface of the moon by US and the Soviet Union.

      There are Laser Ranging facilities in Germany and the US, but any country could do this --- including the then Soviet Union, which at the time would have every reason to discredit the Americans. In theory private individuals could perform a Laser Ranging experiment to confirm the presence of retroreflectors. You could crowdfund such an experiment.

      As for the 16mm video, bear in mind if the film were faked, it was faked using early 1970s SFX technology: Think Space 1999. Still seem likely?

      To me it just looks like a vehicle on the moon. The distant hills are crystal clear because of the airless environment. The kicked up dust flies in slow arcs and just drops down with no resistance, eddying or turbulence --- as if it were in a vacuum under low gravity. Roughly timed it: around 1.5m/s².

      This is the strange thing: In 1970 it was easier to put a man on the moon than to fake it. In the future, it will increasingly be the opposite: digital deep fakery, until your total reality is fakeable.

      ---
      You are so far away it takes light more than twenty minutes to reach you from here. One could say not only light, one could say time. You are in another time from us: the future.
      ---

      Also, I said it's harder to prove that someone walked on the moon. The retroreflectors are still sitting on the moon; the astronauts are now back here, on the moon footprints and golf tees.

      In general it's hard to prove pretty much anything outside mathematics with absolute certainly.

      No idea about the fake moon rocks gifted to the Netherlands. Given the expense of the US Apollo program, I would be astounded if they would give real moon rocks to anybody, except maybe for the purposes of independent analysis. Soviet Luna missions also returned moon rocks, a tiny sample of which was auctioned off at Sotheby's, believe it or not.

      And, of course, there is no shortage of fake moon rocks. They're like pieces of the true cross: enough to build a house.

      Reality is subtle and nuanced. A rational and inquiring skepticism --- and serious scientific and philosophical knowledge --- is necessary to make sense of it.

      Sorry, now I'm even more convinced that the Apollo missions were genuine.

      The other question of course is whether we on this planet anyway have higher immediate priorities. We seem to be making a complete mess of this planet, yet we have billionaires intent on their own personal space programs. (Also fake, you think?) In the case of Elon Musk, he seems to believe this is a backup plan for humanity, which is laudable, maybe even imperative. In the case of Jeff Bezos, it seems to be a backup plan for Jeff Bezos.

      We need to remember this planet is a solitary oasis, in a pitch black desert of inconceivable desolation. Where would you rather live? On the lonely surface of the Moon? In the sulfuric acid rains of Venus? Raise your kids on Mars?

      Maybe we need to be less concerned with leaping into the void and more concerned about life-ending catastrophe we seem intent on inflicting upon ourselves: nuclear war, chemical and radioactive poisoning of our lands and waters, and environmental collapse.

      More concerned about the fate of our children on this Earth.

      ---
      He told you, right? You knew. This was all a sham. You left us here. To suffocate. To starve. Did my father know too? Dad, I just want to know if you left me here to die.

      Delete
  2. Yes, happy 'fly to land on the moon' anniversary hoax days to everyone, 16 July to 24 July, alleged landing and 'walk on the moon' 20-21 July 1969

    Astro-Nots ... NASA = 'Never A Straight Answer'

    Some years ago I thought this hoax would not publicly survive until its 50th anniversary now

    With the hoax of 'nuclear weapons', they can at least pretend to 'abolish nuclear weapons by United Nations agreement'

    Will the next 'moon landings' be just purely fake videos, of better quality than last time?

    Recently I have wondered if, more publicly admitting the moon hoax, will be one of the steps to demolish the USA ... as lead-in to the 'New World Order'

    And maybe that is also a purpose of the Jeffrey Epstein arrest ... his files and videos to humiliate USA leadership across the board ... with Trump's 'trade wars' against everyone a prelude to that

    The below is extremely hilarious tho the language is quite vulgar

    From the Onion, the 'true original' video and audio-tape of the 'men landing on the moon', full of four-letter words by the 'astronauts', 2min50s
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dIkHLO93lCA

    ReplyDelete
  3. https://www.rt.com/news/464223-moon-landings-conspiracy-theories/?utm_source=browser&utm_medium=aplication_chrome&utm_campaign=chrome

    ReplyDelete
  4. https://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2001-space-odyssey-science-fiction-writer-arthur-c-clarke-was-a-pedophile

    In his Sri Lankan house where Clarke lived for 50 years till his death in 2008 a picture of the earth taken from the moon signed by Apollo ´moonlander´ Buzz Aldrin.

    There seems to be a strange link btw between SF and child abuse:

    http://www.castaliahouse.com/safe-space-as-rape-room-science-fiction-culture-and-childhoods-end-part-1-of-5/

    ReplyDelete
  5. Check out:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Ovyl9HTSeg

    Arthur C. Clarke in his ´Ego room´ where he raped on a assembly line basis Sri Lankan beachboys.

    +++

    https://voxday.blogspot.com/2015/12/mailvox-arthur-c-clarke-predator-or.html

    pyrrhus December 28, 2015 12:11 PM

    "All you have to do is read "Childhood's End" to realize Clarke is a creep...And his writing on human relationships never rang true, unlike his technical stuff.

    Childhood's End is about as maniacally gleeful a celebration of Satanism as I've ever seen. Sure, he hides it with the fig leaf of science fiction aliens, but it's obvious that he intends the destruction of all that has been traditionally held good."

    ReplyDelete
  6. Good work. I very much doubt man has even left low-earth orbit, never mind set foot on the moon.
    The films do a good job of highlighting the flaws in the pictures and the footage of the astronauts bouncing around on the moon looks even more ridiculous today.
    But the biggest giveaway that this was all a hoax is the simple fact that in 45 years of rapidly advancing technology, and with all the knowledge supposedly gained from the Apollo missions, no one from any nation has been 'back' or done anything equivalent.
    The whole thing was a fraud, with Von Braun and others probably blackmailed over their Nazi pasts, and the billions going to the government's rich cronies.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Julien romanovsky

    18 July 2019 at 12:28

    The last 2 lines of the pyrrhus comment have been deleted, just now on the voxday blogspot.

    The free pdf could be browsed through here:

    http://avalonlibrary.net/ebooks/Arthur%20C%20Clarke%20-%20Childhood's%20End.pdf

    +++

    https://goodnessandharmony.wordpress.com/2016/10/01/the-sun-vault/

    This site shows another picture of the 2001 Space Peadophile in his ´Ego room´, that tells the story......

    Rupert Murdoch was close with Clarke.

    RM seems to be pulling strings of Donald T. & Therese M.

    Acc. to the NYT M & T phone(d) daily.

    This recent Epstein movie just a diversion for the visit of last june 2 days solidarity trip of NY governor Andrew Cuomo to the sweet little country (slc) on the eastern shore of the Mediterranean: 17 slc companies will take care of the installation of the IoT in the US?

    IoTa Internet of Things abattoir (of the sheople) by means of 5 G.

    (iota is the smallest letter in Hebrew)

    ReplyDelete
  8. Whether the moon landing is a fake is largely irrelevant......HOWEVER the 9/11 fake and the holocaust fake DO make a very big difference.....both carried out by Jews....Conspiracies are carried out for political strategic reasons.
    For example the conspiracy involving the death of Dr Kelly the Weapons inspector was a political assassination.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Just because the filming is faked doesnt mean we never went to the moon. There are other reasons why it was faked, such as to control the media pictures. It suits the powers to have space seem faked or impossible as a cosmic event is around the corner and we need to be distracted from this by things like flat earth and there us no life in the cismos apart from our termite level society... It is laughable that the cosmos in its grandiose-ness can only come up with us.

    ReplyDelete
  10. 'Everything points to a mistake or to a hoax orchestrated by two Dutch artists in 2006. NASA has never authenticated the “rock” (there are no documents tracing its origins), it’s far too big to be a donated lunar sample, and its background story is nonsensical. It was reportedly donated privately in 1969 to a retired prime minister instead of being given, as was customary, to a representative of the then-current Dutch government; it wasn’t put on public display as a Moon rock would have deserved; and real donated Moon rocks were encapsulated in transparent plastic, while this one is not.'

    http://www.moonhoaxdebunked.com/2017/07/98-how-come-moon-rock-donated-to.html

    You're welcome.

    ReplyDelete
  11. He Is Your PROOF For What They ACTUALLY Do In Space!
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h_COQbeaCCE

    the video was deleted by Youtube
    This video really woke a couple of friends up

    ReplyDelete
  12. RAW UNCUT MOON HOAX - FAKING HALFWAY
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m4UVDdUX1IA

    RARE FOOTAGE - NEVER BEFORE SEEN IN MAINSTREAM!
    Unedited, behind-the-scenes footage of false photography from Apollo 11 (the alleged first manned mission to the moon). It is shown here, for the very first time, in its unedited entirety without narration, just as it was delivered to Bart Sibrel from an anonymous NASA informant. It contains outtakes of blatant fake photography, filmed from low earth orbit by the crew, as they created the false illusion that they were, instead, half way to the moon.

    00:25
    Notice, at the beginning of the reel, that the CIA accidentally left the microphone on of their private channel conversation with the astronauts, in which they prompt them to "talk", only AFTER four seconds had elapsed since hearing the initial remarks from NASA. This deliberate pause was done to create the effect of an increased radio delay, so as to appear to be father away from earth than they really were.

    ReplyDelete