Wednesday, 9 September 2015


We think that Britain's monarch should be elected annually.

Below, we show some possible candidates.

Which would be your choice?

Romeo Beckham / Wayne Rooney.


Cara Delevingne /Kate Moss

Greville Janner / Paul Boateng.



Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,


At 9 September 2015 at 01:22 , Blogger butike said...

Mark E Smith, Brian Sewell, Vic Reeves would make good kings. The late Oliver Reed would have been ideal.

At 9 September 2015 at 02:29 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Is that the royal "we"?.

At 9 September 2015 at 02:32 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

elite of scums

At 9 September 2015 at 02:39 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Great spoof! I can't stand any of them. Yes, they're all boring, like the Royal Family.

At 9 September 2015 at 02:47 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

LOL, too cool.... That goes for electing leading statesppl all over the world

At 9 September 2015 at 04:10 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

At 9 September 2015 at 05:08 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

You forgot to include Boris Johnson, the Blonde Bombshell.

A much worthier candidate.

El Sid

At 9 September 2015 at 08:31 , Blogger CS said...

Don't be an idiot. We have enough crooks, liars and morons elected already.

Anyhow, what have you got against the Queen? She has performed her constitutional duty with admirable fidelity.

True, no one wants Charles to succeed her, but that's not a problem. Parliament just needs to pass a new succession act that specifies a mandatory retirement age for the monarch. That would exclude Charles and make way for William, the very modest and sensible helicopter pilot.

At 9 September 2015 at 10:11 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yes! Mark E Smith every day of the week! Maybe Jarvis Cocker for the weekends too

At 9 September 2015 at 10:12 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Shame we can't have Ian Dury

At 9 September 2015 at 10:13 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Paul Gascoigne

At 9 September 2015 at 11:27 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

What did u smoke? Fidelity u say? She was a good pal of Jimmy Savile for instance, dork, so wtf are u talking about?

At 9 September 2015 at 13:46 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Didn't the anglo-saxons or tribes of that era have elected monarchs though I have no idea who was allowed to vote. Not a bad idea as it would at least keep the fool Charles from the throne. I tend to the idea of presidents because if you have a bad one you can at least not elect him next time but Blair got elected 3 times so the people have a responsibility to vote more responsibly than they have done in the past.

At 9 September 2015 at 14:10 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Er... on the other hand, maybe not...
But on a serious note, you have highlighted a major problem with an elected head of state - that inadequate candidates might be deliberately promoted by the elites in order to be manipulated.

At 9 September 2015 at 14:16 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

What about Arthur Scargill.

At 9 September 2015 at 16:38 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Queen Elizabeth's household is at the centre of a vast paedophile network.

It is implicated in the KINCORA child abuse scandal through Lord Louis Mountbatten and Anthony Blunt.

It is implicated in the ELM GUEST HOUSE child abuse scandal through Anthony Blunt, senior palace aide Richard Langley and Commander Michael Trestrail, the Queen's bodyguard.

It is implicated in the DOLPHIN SQUARE abuse scandal through the vacation-partner of the Duchess of Cornwall Derek Laud, and through John Henniker-Major: both of whom supplied children to the Dolphin Square 'VIP' paedophile ring.

The Queen's household is implicated in the NORTH WALES ABUSE RING not only through Derek Laud, but through the Queen's friend and lady-in-waiting Dame Mary Anne Morrison, sister of paedophile MP Sir Peter Morrison.

It is implicated in the notorious PAEDOPHILE INFORMATION EXCHANGE (PIE) through a number of staff and advisers to the Queen: including her cook Douglas Slade and trusted senior diplomats Robert Coghlan and Sir Peter Hayman.

The royal household is implicated in the HAUT DE LA GARENNE paedophile scandal though the extraordinary privileges afforded to abuser and procurer Sir James Savile: adviser and close friend of Princes Charles and Andrew, the late Lord Mountbatten and the Duke of Edinburgh.

Numerous royal staff have reported being sexually assaulted and raped in the Crown palaces. Moreover, butler Paul Kidd operated a paedophile ring from Buckingham Palace."

At 9 September 2015 at 16:42 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Support George Galloway for London Mayor and Max Keiser as Economic adviser in 2016 campaign ..regime change is in the air!! ..London will never be the same again..keep calm and feel the love x

At 9 September 2015 at 17:01 , Blogger WildCatScot said...

I Chose U Aangirfan 💋

At 10 September 2015 at 00:42 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

George Galloway...I would pick hallucinogenic mushrooms as being the culprit here.
The twat who gets kitted up in a pink leotard because he wants Respect.Haven't you figured it out yet...Galloway says all the right things....except when it comes to issues that are crucial to the elite.Maintaining the 9/11 lie is absolutely vital to their interests.Naturally Galloway believes the blizzard of lies.
You could speculate that MI5 are running the idiot...perhaps via their usual "information,that if circulated in the public domain,would result in Galloway crashing and burning".

At 10 September 2015 at 08:09 , Blogger CS said...

LOL, is there any vague insinuation of evil against the ruling elite that you do not immediately believe without the slightest real evidence?

Even Aangirfan has not, so far as I know, demonstrated any personal connection between the Queen and Jimmy Savile (that he was knighted had nothing to do with the Queen, she simply gongs whoever she's told to gong by the Prime Minister - that's one of the things that faithfully fulfilling her constitutional duty is about -- doing what the elected politiicians tell her to do). Charles, so Diana told us, regarded JS as some sort of Guru, but that does not make Charles a child-abuser, it only confirms what is obvious that ruthless but charming criminals do not divulge their criminality to all and sundry, and certainly not powerful or privileged people with whom they want to associate. Of course the Queen and everyone else you imagine to be a child abuser may indeed be so, but you have any evidence except the word of a crackpot Canadian ex-clergyman with a vivid imagination and an appetite for hearsay evidence.


Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home