Friday 1 May 2015


French soldiers have been raping young boys.

The latest example is from the Central African Republic.

A recent report details "the rape and sodomy of starving and homeless young boys by French peacekeeping troops who were supposed to be protecting them at a centre for internally displaced people."

A UN aid worker has been suspended for leaking the report.


The UN and the military are known to be heavily involved in child abuse.

Charity worker Paula Donovan says: "The regular sex abuse by peacekeeping personnel uncovered here and the United Nations' appalling disregard for victims are stomach-turning, but the awful truth is that this isn't uncommon." 

UN staff have been linked to child abuse scandals in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Kosovo, Bosnia, Haiti, Burundi and Liberia....


The boys in the Central African Republic described how they were raped in return for food and money. 

One 11-year-old boy said he was abused when he went looking for food. 

A nine-year-old described being sexually abused with his friend by two French soldiers when they went to a checkpoint to look for something to eat.

In the USA and UK it the military who are said to run the top child abuse rings.

Labels: , , , ,


At 29 April 2015 at 12:19 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

At 29 April 2015 at 15:37 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

And to add to that military-industrial complex there must be those mechanism's that foster the kind of apathy that would serve as buffers that keep a certain segment of it's population just at the below median level of intellect, belief and superstition, to be used as cannon fodder for their wars. A good example would be from the Prussian modeled, Rockefeller funded school system in America to the Clergy urging 'nationalistic duty' in one of your earlier articles Aang. ( )

Hey, speaking of clergy and schooling, apparently, and allegedly, some teachers and clergy have caught on to this scam and seem to find awful ways to capitalize on this situation. Although this site was created for the sole purpose of further independent investigative reporting, using only public information and a healthy dose of speculation, the purveyor's of 'Hampstead Research', are being attacked as if they were committing the crimes the children allege happened to them, when from the beginning this effort had to have been born from a very sincere, pained and concerned person as any sane and rational person would naturally be. Some of you remain adamant that nothing could have been occurring within the Hampstead burg, yet two major motion pictures loosely based on some of the strange occurrences in London ( and I mean very loose: Hot Fuzz and World's End ) many many testimonies of clergy, schools and military involved in satanic and sex trafficking here from Aangirfan, and a community steeped in Occult folklore for centuries, and you STILL want to play devil's advocate in all of the forum's. Well, I believe that Jacqui and their crew are doing a wonderful job of uncovering what has been going on in Hampstead, with Ricky Dearman, and the two children that are still in foster care over this horrible debacle. I believe these people saw an injustice being done and only picked up where the police left off (and SHOULD have investigated further according to the research these people have uncovered, here is a synopsis of what they have uncovered thus far:

That alleged cult members know one another
That there was/is (at least) one business irregularity
That alleged cult trafficker parents had travelled, or could travel professionally to the child trafficking areas named by the children
That there is some contact between alleged parent abusers and alleged teacher abusers
That alleged cult members are working inside Hampstead churches in positions to do with children – and the Church
A woman named Polly works at New End school, knows alleged CCPS abuser, Anna Maria Maguire and seems to work in a network of LAs
A man who may be related to Polly posts over-candid pics of his children on Facebook
A woman named Marlene has contacts in Angola and has an unusual Facebook profile that might well fit a trafficker
There really is a man named Dan at the lock shop (we know more about him but we can’t let that out)
That there is an estate agent named Galyna Upson who travels back and forth from Ukraine
That there was a CCTV camera outside the Church: the footage could have been released but was not
That alleged abuser Maria Yilmaz has a best friend who is a pornographer and may be a dark occultist
That previous Hampstead Parochial head “Mission priest” Simon Atkinson was carousing in New York
That Ricky Dearman could well have been using his computers for child pornography.


At 29 April 2015 at 17:33 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

The latest from Jacqui's 'HR', this very well written and produced video by Don Albahaca:

When Ricky Met Vicky


At 29 April 2015 at 20:28 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

At 30 April 2015 at 02:22 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dear ASolo,
I just wanted to put you straight on one thing as I have been blocked from saying this many times on Hampstead Research's site.
The suggestions that RD is involved in illegal online activity in VID 17 here
are completely spurious and amount to false allegations based on poor logic or misunderstandings or confirmation bias at best.
Evidence is here
see my comment near the end.
It seems that Hampstead research is unwilling to admit this. I wonder why.
best regards

At 30 April 2015 at 06:47 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

I wonder if this is where Aangirfan stands on the matter as well if they chose this comment over the the one I submitted previous to the one above that did not show up?


At 30 April 2015 at 06:58 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

And, like Jaqcui stated, she has no idea about the complex IT lingo you were using and is relying on her teams research and the fact that her lawyers are comfortable enough with the information to consider using it as evidence. I guess if the information is spurious and in error that will be determined by another court. And just as well as so many other thousands of computer experts even you could be wrong. Thanks though.


At 30 April 2015 at 08:15 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Did you actually follow and read what I posted? I assure you it is not at all complex or technical. Even you can verify it yourself.
Watch the video
Hampstead Research basically said that "predictive analysis software" says it, so it must be true. But the links they were following were paid for ads and nothing to do with such software. The links are completely unrelated to anyone.
Go investigate, if you want.
I have no idea of the views of aangirfan.
It is certainly true that Hampstead Research has blocked all of my posts which is why you have not heard of this before. I really do not know why they would not show this. Probably because they do not want to admit an error.
best wishes,

At 30 April 2015 at 16:53 , Anonymous noncebuster said...

What's happened to the shirlz007 blog? Its been cleaned out!

At 30 April 2015 at 18:21 , Anonymous Anonymous said...
carrie chapman catt

At 1 May 2015 at 06:42 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Aang must have just been being funny waiting on posting that comment, you two girls can be jokesters too huh lol. Lots of love ladies!


At 1 May 2015 at 06:48 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

And to the techie, I dont mean to disparage your research, but I hope that you are wrong because THEY (meaning Jacqui's HR) are pretty sure that it is viable information. I personally have a mental block when it comes to IT and dont have the patience for it so everything you say might as well be in zwahili. Let's hope you are simply a weekend techie and wrong. Anywhichway, what percentage would you consider your hypothesis to be in the right?


At 2 May 2015 at 00:28 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

uummm 100%... ;-)
the whole vid 17 was based on "predictive analysis software" and what is used on that site - is clearly not that. As I said, you can verify for yourself. You don't need to be a techie. The links 'recommended for you' are just paid for adverts for other sites which are offered no matter what site you do your initial search on. It is that simple. Try it. You get the same cycle of links to click on offered to follow no matter if your initial site search is for, or even 8-)

If that is not clear, you can watch the video made which shows this - maybe that is easier to understand.

best wishes

At 2 May 2015 at 09:29 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ok... thank you for the detailed response and for taking the time to make it clearer, sincerely.



Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home