The mainstream media is hiding stuff.
Starmer’s growth plan ‘doomed’ without access to EU markets, warn economists
Labour leader told if elected he will have to rejoin the customs union (EU) to meet party’s manifesto pledges, while 56% of voters say Brexit was bad for economy
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/article/2024/jun/22/starmer-growth-plan-doomed-access-eu-markets-economists
~~~
said...Labour’s pledge to recognise Palestine doesn’t help this cause surely?
said...It’s window dressing. What is left of Palestine to recognise at this point?
It’s a bit like the United States and Canada finally agreeing to recognise — after centuries of genocide and land clearances — respectively, the American Indian nations and the Canadians Indigenous peoples, by granting each people or tribe jurisdiction over a designated reservation(s).
‘Recognising’ Palestine (at some indeterminate point in the future) — AFTER the country has been desecrated, its people genocided, and millions of Palestinians forced to flee as refugees to foreign lands — will mean recognition for a tiny Palestinian ‘reservation’ that is no longer a real, functioning nation or society.
A Palestine in name only. A ‘reservation’ imposed on the colonised by the colonisers. A country with only a fraction of the land area and population it once held, and no real sovereignty over its own affairs. Policed and menaced at every juncture by Zionist Israel, and further diminished every year with incursions of yet more Israeli ‘settlers’ and their accursed ‘settlements’.
~~~~
A successful barrister named Mark Darcy (Not starmer apparently) keeps appearing in Bridget's life,
'Cleaver and Darcy were ... two men in Jones' life[3] ("I'm not sleeping with them both at once," she explains later to her friend Shazza. "I accidentally slept with each of them separately"),[4] and the plot line launched into a pregnancy. As Fielding said, "she's heading in a different direction."[5]'
The Starmer Project by Oliver Eagleton
https://www.counterfire.org/article/how-the-right-took-back-control-of-labour-the-starmer-project-review/
“He is a ruthless autocrat ‘combining intervention abroad with repression at home’ …
“… defending the state while prosecuting activists …
“He prevented Home Office officials responsible for the death of migrant Jimmy Mubenga from being charged.
“[He] did the same for PC Harwood, the officer responsible for killing Ian Tomlinson, the newspaper vendor who died following the G20 protests.
“[And] most famously, he refused to bring charges against the killers of Jean Charles de Menezes, shot dead by police at Stockwell tube station.
“Similarly, Starmer protected the Spycops who used their undercover roles to abuse women …
“During his tenure, the CPS acted ‘as a proxy’ for the US State Department overseas, with Starmer himself becoming an envoy for the US Department of Justice.
“He forged close links with US Attorney General, Eric Holder: at one point going way beyond his remit by promising to secure Gary McKinnon’s extradition — a young man who, while looking for evidence of UFOs, hacked into US military databases.
“Eagleton describes Starmer’s ‘fury’ with Theresa May when as Home Secretary she stopped the extradition …
“A prize pursued by the Blairites who took over the leadership team (including Peter Mandelson …), Eagleton provides a detailed account of the manoeuvres to expel Corbyn, including how the antisemitism row was used to achieve this goal …"
Reviewed by Terina Hine
https://www.counterfire.org/article/how-the-right-took-back-control-of-labour-the-starmer-project-review/
Starmer and wife.
Sat 2024-06-15
Anonymous has left a new comment on 'Achievements':In searching for the reason why Keir Starmer and his wife want Victoria Starmer to stay “in the shadows” — could the following offer a clue?:
Margaret Hodge
“As a young lawyer, Victoria Starmer, nee Alexander, WAS EMPLOYED BY **MARGARET HODGE’S HUSBAND**.
“‘Victoria is the daughter of a Jewish accountant, Bernard Alexander and Barbara Moyes, who converted to Judaism …
“‘She qualified as a solicitor in 2001 [the year of Mossad’s 9-11 false flag outrage] and worked for the London firm [HENRY] HODGE, JONES & ALLEN …*’”
[source: Michael Ashcroft’s biography]
“The Hodges, Peter Mandelson [Jeffrey Epstein’s partner] and Michael Levy were to lead the operation, with Blair providing the public face.
“The Hodges, in charge of Islington Council, and then co-creating ‘New Labour’ with Epstein’s Peter Mandelson and Michael Levy, are thought to be have operated as top Mossad agents or assets in the UK.
“Margaret and Henry Hodge were not only very close friends of the Blairs, but also their neighbours: ‘having persuaded them to move to their street in Islington in the 1990s’.
“HENRY HODGE was, moreover, a member of the executive of the National Council for Civil Liberties when it was affiliated with the PAEDOPHILE INFORMATION EXCHANGE.
“PIE encouraged paedophiles to patronise Elm Guest House, an alleged ‘Mossad’ child brothel reportedly used for the entrapment of politicos and VIPs supplied from the Grafton Close home overseen by Richmond Council (where the notorious Keith Vaz worked until he left to join Margaret Hodge at Islington Council).”
Do you begin to see why Sir Keir Starmer doesn’t want the UK electorate to know that his wife Lady Victoria is — since 2001 — a longtime protege of Margaret and Henry ‘Mossad’ Hodge?
With the Hodges having long cultivated Victoria Starmer nee Alexander, and Epstein’s Peter Mandelson having long cultivated Victoria’s husband Sir Keir, it’s abundantly clear that Britain’s new, Jewish ‘First Couple’, are every-inch-the controlled Mossad agents or operatives.
A couple whose engagement, marriage, careers, and entire political trajectory was almost certainly conceived and plotted prior to Mossad’s 9-11 false flag outrage, and then set in motion shortly thereafter: with PIE’s Henry Hodge employing Victoria in his London law firm while his wide Margaret Hodge pulled Tony Blair’s strings and allegedly continued the child abuse cover-ups.
Victoria Starmer, nee Alexander, was thus well prepared to ‘meet Keir for the first time’ 4 years later, in 2005, with the 9-11 Greater Israel plan by then in full swing.
And here we are, 20 years later, with the next phase of the 9-11 Greater Israel plan now unfolding in Gaza…
A genocide and land clearance over which Keir and Victoria Starmer will shortly exert vast influence at the top of a Mossad Five Eyes nation.
https://t.co/HIXqFWaTj7
Labour’s pledge to recognise Palestine doesn’t help this cause surely?
ReplyDeleteIt’s window dressing. What is left of Palestine to recognise at this point?
ReplyDeleteIt’s a bit like the United States and Canada finally agreeing to recognise — after centuries of genocide and land clearances — respectively, the American Indian nations and the Canadians Indigenous peoples, by granting each people or tribe jurisdiction over a designated reservation(s).
‘Recognising’ Palestine (at some indeterminate point in the future) — AFTER the country has been desecrated, its people genocided, and millions of Palestinians forced to flee as refugees to foreign lands — will mean recognition for a tiny Palestinian ‘reservation’ that is no longer a real, functioning nation or society.
A Palestine in name only. A ‘reservation’ imposed on the colonised by the colonisers. A country with only a fraction of the land area and population it once held, and no real sovereignty over its own affairs. Policed and menaced at every juncture by Zionist Israel, and further diminished every year with incursions of yet more Israeli ‘settlers’ and their accursed ‘settlements’.
It’s also very well documented what Keir Starmer’s ‘pledges’ are worth and those of the outfit he now leads.
ReplyDeleteAccording to Keir Starmer (like his political hero and predecessor Tony Blair) a political ‘pledge’ is only valid ***on the day it is issued***. That is, on the day when the person or party making the pledge either believes in it or doesn’t believe in it, but finds it convenient to utter.
Tomorrow, Starmer and his party may no longer believe in a pledge that was made yesterday, “because circumstances change” (lol).
When ‘circumstances change’ — which of course they always do, if by change we mean the passage of time — then, according to the corrupt politician’s self-serving logic, the ‘historic’ pledge or party manifesto is rendered entirely obsolete, null and void.
“I believed in ‘X’ yesterday when we said it, but I’ve since been forced to changed my position because of what has happened in the meantime…. Consequently I won’t keep my promise and I owe you precisely nothing”.
Political manifestos and pledges are the great scam of modern Western politics, with Starmer in particular having absorbed much of the ‘skill’ of lying-without-formally-lying from Mandelson and Blair.