Uxbridge rigged?
The UK Conservative Party "was widely expected to lose Mr Johnson’s seat (Uxbridge) to Labour, according to analysis of the latest constituency-level polling by Focaldata and Best for Britain."
Uxbridge - polling showed Labour had an eight-point lead over the Conservatives.
BUT, the Conservatives won, so, was it rigged?
(https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/by-elections-2023-when-date-candidates-polls-uxbridge-selby-somerton-2485538)
...
BUT the Conservative candidate Steve Tuckwell narrowly held on to the seat vacated by Boris Johnson, winning by 495 votes.
Turnout of 46.1% was high for a by-election.
Polling conducted by JLP showed the ULEZ expansion was the second most important issue for people after the cost of living.
(https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-66267672)
posted by Anon @ 01:08
3 Comments
3 Comments:
https://twitter.com/ValuetainmentTV/status/1682134130513920004?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1682134130513920004%7Ctwgr%5Ebddce9a02a3b6ae80847aaf47fbc1c9e5867772b%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.infowars.com%2Fposts%2Fleaked-video-retired-four-star-general-mcchrystal-claims-us-behind-nord-stream-pipeline-bombing%2F
Yup. Indeed, Uxbridge was rigged.
Remember..............You have a choice.
Either Asshole A or Asshole B.
If, like some constituents with an intellectual voter base or the protest vote or the Scottish vote, you could always vote Asshole C.
The choice is yours.
Voting by mail, is a wonderfull tool for the PTB, to rig elections. This is valid all over the world.
Caveman
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home