Epstein met CIA Director
Jeffrey Epstein's private calendar revealed he had scheduled meetings with prominent individuals, including the current CIA director and an attorney who served in the Obama administration.
posted by Anon @ 22:16
6 Comments
6 Comments:
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Unknown commented
The Zionist lobby seem incredibly sensitive regarding Goldman Sachs.
Why do they seek to protect GS at all costs even calling for the ritual anti-semitic sacrifice of The Guardian's editor (who is Jewish)
"The lady doth protest too much" ?
Hi res image of the supposidly anti-semitic cartoon.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12031851/The-Guardian-engulfed-anti-Semitism-storm-MPs-blast-sickening-cartoon-ex-BBC-chairman.html
Goldman Sach's has a 'poor' reputation
(Peter Sutherland chairman of Goldman Sachs International (1995–2015))
MPs last night told Katharine Viner to consider her position after the Left-wing paper published an offensive cartoon of ex-BBC chairman Richard Sharp featuring Jewish stereotypes, before making what was dubbed a 'half-hearted' apology (DM article)
Can you spot the multiple anti-semitic offences ?
Apophenia, or patternicity, is characterized by seeing patterns in unrelated things. Anyone can experience this, but if you live with schizophrenia, it may be part of a delusion.
Tory MP Andrew Percy, who is Jewish and vice-chairman of the all-party parliamentary group on anti-Semitism, said: 'The cartoon was disgusting.
I assume these things have to be signed off. That's the shocking thing about it. More than one person probably looked at that cartoon, looked at the grotesque tropes that are in it and thought 'this is OK to print'.'
Asked if Ms Viner should consider her position, Mr Percy said: 'Yes.' He added: 'If this had been a cartoon of anything else, any other form of racism, I have no doubt that people would be resigning.'
Fellow Tory MP Peter Bone said: 'It was sickening. It says a lot about the people running The Guardian.
The cowardly Guardian appear to be capitulating to the small number of vocal witch hunters.
A Guardian spokesman said: 'The Guardian apologises to Mr Sharp, to the Jewish community and to anyone offended.
'We have received a small number of complaints about the cartoon.'
There are many interesting questions to ask about what is happening here. Asking whether the cartoon is ‘actually’ racist is not one.
Far more interesting to ask, for example, why it was published. Who approved it after the cartoonist presented it, and why.
Was the cartoonist himself being unknowingly, *unintentionally* anti semitic? (In which case, how scary that a presumably educated, well paid, employee on a national Woke publication could be so stupid and unconsciously racist!)
Or, was he being knowingly, *intentionally* anti semitic (if so, with what purpose in mind?)
Same questions to be asked of all the editors, subeditors, proofreaders, page designers, lawyers, etc. (if any) who cast eyes over the cartoon prior to its publication.
>>> Rigged comments in the Daily Mail targetting the plethora of "left wing" antisemites...
Cartoonists presents the latest useful and effective ‘stick’ with which to:
— Weaken and cast aspersions on the real Left and its positions (and even to attack the fake Starmerite left, to those so fanatically wedded to party they fail to see it represents minimal change).
“Look, all Leftists are racists and more racist then Rightists!” (Doubtful!).
— Specifically to tarnish and undermine real Leftist positions on (a) Israel-Palestine and (b) the influence of the Zionist Israel lobby on Western politics
— Keep the entire U.K. and Western Establishment in check and singing the Zionist song: all terrified to criticise both Israel and the Zionist Israel lobby on legitimate, decidedly non-racist grounds (indeed anti-racist grounds)… for fear of being hounded out of public life as despicable racists.
— Also, plenty of projection going on! What better way to reassure oneself that one is “definitely not a racist” than to accuse others (people one doesn’t like) of racism *first*, *loudest*, and *longest*!
Not saying that those DM comment-writers — be their pronouncements rigged, fake, or bona fide — are all racists. Some of them may very well be excellent-meaning, anti-racist citizens, fighting the good fight as they see it.
But some of the comment-writers may very well be quite racist /antisemitic people indeed... varying in how much they are aware or unaware of the biases and tendencies for which they feel some shame, and/or, know that they *ought* to.
Projection is cathartic — it allows we as human beings to live with ourselves, including with major moral/behavioural deficiencies that we know, suspect, or fear that we possess.
What would happen if everyone in the world were ***fully aware and mindful***, ***at all times***, ***in all the waking hours*** of ***all the ways*** in which they are not who or what they would wish to be, or could be?
Fully aware and mindful, indeed, of the ***full extent*** of their flaws and failings, and what the ***full significance*** of that has been for other human beings and the wider universe?
I don’t think any human being could bear it?
Instead death from.. inability to live with it?
Some comments have been moved to a different forum.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home