Tuesday, 3 March 2015


The media presented the moon landings as fact.

This video is presented as fiction, but may be fact?

Most of what the media has told us on the big issues is fiction.


  1. The Apollo 11 mission was faked. The astronauts were hypnotized in order to implant the false memory of having actually gone to the Moon. This goes to show how strong mind-control-techniques were even back then. Then again, so does the mass-hypnosis with regard to 9/11 in the USA. Saudi terrorists were allowed to attack the buildings, which were then demolished by their Israeli owners. Yet still it seems that most people believe the official story.

    1. ^
      Yet still

      ... Saudi terrorists were allowed to attack the buildings ...

      0fficial story.

    2. I can state with 100% confidence that there was no hijacked passenger aircraft attack on 911. Whatever planes they used were not passenger jets, the plane operation was a complete work of fiction designed to frame Muslims and mask the explosive destruction of the towers. It is a very pure false flag with no physical involvement by the supposed perpetrators.The plane thing is in fairly boring detail here. http://crimesofempire.com/2014/11/11/september-11th-the-crime-that-will-end-the-empire/


    1) Let's start with the fact that allegedly Armstrong had been "first man" who had set his "foot on lunar soil".
    When I saw that life transmission in the hot Swedish summer of 1969 what I saw was this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R9XBAxdKVRE .. or (same thing) this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HCt1BwWE2gA.

    Even then it should have been obvious to me that Armstrong could never have been the "first man on the moon soil". This because Armstrong's descent to the lunar surface was transmitted by a TV camera, which at that time ALREADY(!) HAD BEEN POSITIONED ON THE SURFACE OF THE MOON - and definitely outside of the Lunar Module (LM)!

    So there must have been a brave - but unknown - camera man, who walked the lunar surface long before(!) Armstrong came down that ladder!
    First this camera man had to test the lunar soil. If it had been like quicksand - he would have been gone.
    Then he had to ask his buddies, to reach down to him the TV camera.
    Then he had to ask them for the power cord.
    Then he had to continue to call his buddies for the data cable - and ask them to connect the other end to the broadcast transmitter of the LM, because this camera could only broadcast "life" and was not something (very important!) like a "Video Camera". This so, because this TV camera, as other TV cameras too, had no recording function (more to that later) and could only transmit "life".

    So all this with Armstrong being the fist man to set foot on the lunar surface …
    IT WAS THIS MYSTERIOUS CAMERA MAN who 'leaped' for mankind!

    2) Only recently I discovered that there is supposed to have been another - necessarily simultaneous! - TV broadcast of Armstrong's descent to the lunar soil. But this one being recorded from the hatch on top of the LM. this time the TV camera is looking down to Armstrong.
    See: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wdSPF7ujsdw ... or here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=csO9VTtrg5A.

    BUT THIS CANNOT BE! Because there was only one(!) TV camera aboard! See http://www.lpi.usra.edu/lunar/missions/apollo/apollo_11/photography/, where it says "and a television camera."
    So "a": that's one - and not two!
    Also for reasons of weight there was of course only one(!) TV cameras onboard of the LM.

    So also that scene with Armstrong 'broadcasted' from the hatch of the LM …IS A LIE!
    You can't broadcast one-and-the-same scene from two different positions with ONE TV camera at exactly the same moment!

    Also this: According to the then state of technology in 1969, but especially because you could only carry emaciated technology in the LM for reasons of weight, the broadcast equipment in the LM could not have transmitted to earth the data of two TV cameras at the same time/synchronously!
    And a recording and playback device (to record and playback a recorded scene for broadcasting it later to earth) was not onboard.


  3. The moon landings took place but the film footage was faked so nothing out of the norm would be broadcast to the people. The super powers are v interested in space travel as they are planning to make an exit for when the disaster happens

  4. Most of the NASA images show a studio set: the lights reveal themselves as spot lights, not the sun.

    The films where flyovers are seen were created with a big replica of the moon surface, in a studio, someone pointed at Lookout Mountain Studios in Hollywood, CA http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lookout_Mountain_Air_Force_Station

    There are many inconsistencies that involve Van Allen belt or the temperature differences on the moon, but a big problem is: why no other manned missions by NASA in the recent years?

    Someone can't believe that thousand of people involved didn't leak anything... But NASA is highly compartimentalised, so only a few Paperclip boys knew it all.

    The 'space race' was bas propaganda.

    1. State-of-the-art studio
      Surrounded by an electrified security fence, the 100,000-square-foot
      facility on two and a half acres was originally built in 1941 as a
      World War II air defense center that coordinated radar installations
      on nearby mountaintops. When the Lookout Mountain Air Force
      Station film studio was established in 1947, the facility was so
      surreptitious that even the residents in the area were unaware of what
      went on within the compound.

      The Lookout Mountain Air Force Station studio was comparably
      equipped to major film studios and possessed:
       One full stage, two screening rooms
       The capability to process 16 mm and 35 mm motion picture film
       Optical printing capabilities
       Still photography laboratory
       Animation and editorial departments
       17 climate-controlled film vaults
       Support facilities
       Bomb shelter
       Helicopter pad
       Two underground parking garages

  5. Thanks Aangirfan.
    Interesting (and pleasing) to see a "wacky" topic here for a change. Speaking of wacky, I watched an interview with a somewhat discredited individual called James Casbolt, (Bases 39 Casbolt in Court http://youtu.be/cj7xbHZ6mSo) on a channel that mostly looks at UFO issues and it was interesting that Casbolt mentions a specific address that he stated was the site of ritual murders of children he claimed to have participated in as a child. He said it was Recreation Road in Reading, number five I think, no idea if it even exists.
    The whole moon thing is hard to figure. It is quite clear that the footage shown at the time was completely fake, that part is easy, whether that means they did not go or just preferred not to show what was there is the hard thing to figure.

    1. saying wacky might show a bit of ignorance.. this is a big of subject as 911, kid abuse and blackmail and the 21on1st secret as they are all related and show th masses hypnotised by lies and manipulation of the false media...

    2. Wacky was in quotation marks and if you had bothered to read the comment before responding you would see that I take it seriously.

  6. Interesting link to a mockumentary directed by William Karel. Another of Karel's mockumentaries is "Die Wahrheit über den Holocaust". Translated is "The truth about the holocaust" Oh wait, it was NOT intended as a mockumentary? Sorry about that.


  7. Moon landings are all a hoax. Another ritual transformation of the collective mind.BELIEVE.

  8. The most damning fact to my mind is that every single one of the original recordings of the lunar landings - 800 in all - have disappeared! Imagine that! The most important footage in history was allegedly recorded over. The only footage of the lunar landings available to us today are those shot by network TV cameramen filming the 'live' action beamed to NASA monitors - very poor quality and impossible to properly analyse. Nothing more than yet another 'blunder' of course, like those numerous staggering 911 stuff ups . 'Aren't we silly billies, sorry about that!'

  9. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FBaAfl4SuI4

  10. Of course the moon landings were fake.

    Some engineers at Nvidia created an excellent and precise simulation of the first lunar landing with accurate optics. Frozen in time, complete with a little Buzz Aldrin action figure.

    The lighting in the little computer-enhanced diorama accords precisely with the lighting of the photographs taken by the astronauts.

    The model lacks a certain degree of realism. For example, the little action figure is just a toy. He lacks memories, consciousness and a soul. A tragic inability to know the sacred awe felt by the real Buzz.

    "Look. He can fly and, oh, shoot lasers. He's sworn to protect the galaxy from the evil emperor Zurg."

    Give it a few years. Maybe Nvidia will get into neuromorphic molecular-scale spintronics or quantum photonics. And improve the model. Then you can ask Buzz if his world is convincing.

    And maybe Buzz will create his own little worlds. The wonders of recursion.


    By now it should be apparent that we in this world are humble and simple things.

    We are not even God's train set.

    "Of course the moon landings were fake.

  11. Contribute Add to List

    GENDER: Masculine
    USAGE: Greek Mythology (Latinized)
    OTHER SCRIPTS: Απολλων (Ancient Greek)
    PRONOUNCED: ə-PAW-lo (English) [key]
    Meaning & History
    From Greek Απολλων (Apollon), which is of unknown meaning, though perhaps related to Indo-European *apelo "strength". Another theory states that Apollo can be equated with Appaliunas, an Anatolian god whose name possibly means "father lion" or "father light". The Greeks later associated Apollo's name with the Greek verb απολλυμι (apollymi) meaning "to destroy".
    In Greek mythology Apollo was the son of Zeus and Leto and the twin of Artemis. He was the god of prophecy, medicine, music, art, law, beauty, and wisdom. Later he also became the god of the sun and light.
    Source: http://www.behindthename.com/name/apollo

    "The Zeiss 50mm and 36.5mm, f/0.7 lenses used to film candlelight sequences for "Barry Lyndon" without the addition of artificial light were originally still-camera lenses developed for use by NASA in the Apollo Moon-landing program, and modified by Cinema Products Corp. The 50mm lens, shown here in focusing mount, had to have the adjustable shutter blade, necessary for still photography, removed for filming."

    "According to the Brown Driver Briggs lexicon, the Hebrew abaddon (Hebrew: אבדון; avadon) is an intensive form of the Semitic root and verb stem abad (אָבַד) "perish" (transitive "destroy"), which occurs 184 times in the Hebrew Bible. The Septuagint, an early Greek translation of the Hebrew Bible, renders "abaddon" as "ἀπώλεια,"[1] while the Greek Apollyon comes from apollumi (ἀπόλλυμι), "to destroy"."

    Revelation 9:11 And they had a king over them, which is the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name in the Hebrew tongue is Abaddon, but in the Greek tongue hath his name Apollyon. KJV, 1611

    Moon landing being fake mentioned here by former Bush advisor (I think advisor, definitely on his staff in some capacity)

    The notion of planes hitting the twin towers, is absurd - literally.
    Aluminium cannot go through steel and if I was to drop a twin tower upon a plane, I think I know which object would be destroyed.