Hampstead Satanic Abuse Case: UK Column, 20 March, 2015.
posted by Anon @ 08:24
19 Comments
Saturday, 21 March 2015
Previous Posts
- USA ATTACKS THE WORLD
- 'CIA KILLS TUNIS TOURISTS' - FALSE FLAG?
- HIGH COURT JUDGE SPEAKS ABOUT HAMPSTEAD
- FAKE FINGER?
- CYRIL SMITH, STOCKPORT, CORRUPT POLICE, MI5
- HAMPSTEAD ALLEGATIONS - Updated
- POLICE FILMED SMITH PICKING UP BOYS - POLICE USED ...
- COVER-UP OF SEX ORGIES
- Mr.Bean's Holiday
- DAVID ICKE, CHILD ABUSE, CANADA, ISIS
Subscribe to
Posts [Atom]
19 Comments:
Great work as ever Anng but can we distance the real Hampstead case from the fake Hollie Grieg case...and please people do your own research...start with .https://holliegreigetc.wordpress.com/...there is no comparison so why the comparison? Disinformation,misinformation and cognitive dissonance are all part of the distraction from the truth and ultimately its consequences.The forces of the controlled opposition cannot do any independant critical thinking for themselves as they are by definition controlled by the existing elite and the Hollie Grieg story demonstrates this succinctly.What do you think Aang? Happpy Equinox 1&All x
Justice Pauffley says that children fiddling with a dog's privates is nothing unusual. Well, all the years i spent as a child that thought never occurred to me, and with all the hundreds of other kids i knew i never heard of it and i doubt if it the idea ever occurred to them either.
. The ruling class must be very peculiar indeed if it is not unusual for their kids to fiddle with a dog's privates, but many did go to public boarding school so loads of them are now bent as a two bob note anyway.c
As concerting and inspiring as Mr. Gerrish's testimony is, I am still urged to appeal to those in charge of the manifest of this ship. Captain Draper and her Quartermaster Mr. Christie have harbored themselves up for much too long in the starboard quarters whilst it's crew has spearheaded their campaign from the beginning. It is time they come forward and parlay with the queen. Their exile is already a matter of record, isn't it about time to make an even more powerful statement? Mr. Christie had no problem putting the faces of those children online I would almost have to insist that it is his time as well if he really cares about those children, the allegations laid against him, and the future of the children yet to be affected by this alleged cult. As the numerous articles already cited claim that over 4 million people viewed these materials and it is with a good bet that most of those 4 million had concern and empathy for those children regardless of the circumstances (contrary to the unbelievably callous and untoward awkwardness of 'Justice' Pauffleys 'observation' that some viewing the material might have prurient intentions; a ruling totally beyond her scope of judgement as an official of the courts, meant only as a PR tactic to discredit and shame), is it your intention Mr. Christie and Ms. Draper to take advantage of that good will? Please. For the sake of all involved, corroborate your claims for all to see.
AkhaldanSolo
The idea that when the Establishment commit a crime, whether the Iraq war or the child rape at the Elm Guest House, they will just conduct an inquiry of whatever length and futility required to make the problem go away and expect people to be grateful and actually equate this process of obfuscation and delay with justice is no longer sustainable. The contempt of the rulers for the people is completely unmistakeable and nauseating.
I have not studied the Hollie Gregg case in any depth, but there are many parallels with the Hampstead modus operandi, not least that it has been labelled a hoax and "nothing to see here."
It's just not the kind of stuff people go around making up, is it?
"Sabine K McNeill – writing from exile since 11 February 2015"
Maybe she's on CIA asset Uri Geller's Lamb Island, the one he bought on the same date some years ago, given his infatuation with the digits 11 11.
Don't read too much into it though, albeit certain parties communicate occultly via numerals.
cheers
Rubbish. My wee boy would love nothing better than to flick the dog's winkle, though I don't encourage it and it's not happened (I hope)
It appears that most of his and his classmates jibes (aged 7) revolve around winkles, pees, poos and poofaces.
cheers
Yeah, once Icke jumped on the wagon, it was not hard to ascertain.
cheers
David(K)icke, the gatekeeper:
http://www.davidicke.com/headlines/tag/judge-pauffley/
Mainstream B***S***:
https://topinfopost.com/2015/03/21/evil-mother-tortured-children-ella-draper
Justice Pauffley -vs- email:
http://disinfo.com/2014/04/dont-email-capital-letters-court-tells-insensitive-father-custody-dispute/
http://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t11115-the-end-is-near-in-the-madeleine-mccann-case
http://www.againstchildtrafficking.org/
http://www.globalresearch.ca/yemen-american-weapons-once-more-landed-up-in-the-wrong-hands-mistakenly-in-the-hands-of-al-qaeda/5437988
Two new vids on HampsteadResearch:
https://hampsteadresearch.wordpress.com/
Reply to Dan
Tennis Coaches
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/03/20/heidi-fleiss-hollywood-madam_n_6912818.html
But it has been admitted that Scotland Yard has been covering up sadistic and satanic, serial child sex abuse and murders for the greater part of the 20th Century.
It was an inevitable outcome that Pauffley would turn things around as she did. Any "judgement" other than this would have resulted in bad press and awkward moments for her controllers and their ilk.
Flicking a dog's Willie, that is weird.
A lie is most believable when told between two truths-nicely done
yeah, the mother needs to appeal this ridiculous decision
he's a hired troll, designed to distract and detract from the subject matter. See the double talk- his wee boy would--but his wee boy hasn't? And uh yeah, young kids TALK about everything and some are exposed (usually based on socio-economic situations) to much more profane content than ususal--
ME NEITHER twinkled with a dogs WINKLE ur sick man...
The Hollie Greig case is most certainly not a hoax! Just because the people who she accused said they did not do it...that does not make it a hoax! Despite Hollie having medical evidence that backed up her claims, and being awarded compensation for her injuries, the police never investigated the case. The criminal injuries board investigated, they said that Hollie was a reliable and honest witness. A large number of shills and pedo protectors were employed to discredit Anne and Hollie, sadly some people within the "alternative" community fell for their lies and fabricated evidence. The fact remains, Hollie was awarded compensation, and Hollie still stands by all her original claims.
Thanks to a very corrupt pedo ridden establishment, both women have both been silenced by the courts, and can no longer defend themselves.
The parallels with the Hampstead case are remarkable, the establishment have a blue print that they follow when these matters come to light, blame the Mother being their top line of defense.
Anne Greig like Ella Draper, had an abusive violent ex husband, in both cases they have insinuated that the women coaxed the child/children to make it all up, just to have a go at the ex. This is ridiculous on both counts, why make up such elaborate stories involving so many people, when the alleged target is just the ex? That makes no sense.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home