Wednesday, 9 July 2014

HAVERS, JAGGER, DIANA, BRONFMAN AND CHILD ABUSE

 
Michael Havers and Christian Bale

The aunt of the actor Nigel Havers is Elizabeth Butler-Sloss.

Nigel Havers has defended his aunt's abuse inquiry role.


'COVER-UP MERCHANT' CHOSEN FOR CHILD ABUSE INQUIRY....

L.O.L.



"Nigel Haver's lovers included nudes in studios ... 

"It's known that Diana, Princess of Wales was an admirer."


Jagger and Savile

Nigel Haver's father, Sir Michael Havers, was the top legal man in the UK when Sir Jimmy Savile and his politician friends were reportedly raping and murdering children throughout the UK.

Havers comes clean .

Sir Michael Havers defended the spooky Mick Jagger after he was arrested for drugs offences back in 1967.

Sir Michael adored the 'gay' Mick Jagger.

MYSTERIOUS MICK JAGGER / MICK JAGGER, GAY PEOPLE, SPOOKS / MICK JAGGER, SATANISM AND THE CIA / WHAT LINKS MICHAEL JACKSON, JIMMY ...



Sir Michael sent the innocent Guildford Four to jail. 

Havers comes clean . / Guildford Four


Edgar Bronfman, King of the Jews.

Nigel Havers can't begin to recall how many people he has slept with.

Nigel Havers is currently married to his third wife, Georgiana Bronfman, the former wife of the former the top member of the Kosher Nostra.

Havers comes clean . / EDGAR BRONFMAN King of the Jews. /
Prince William and Bronfman.

~~~~

Left Reinhard Heydrich? Centre Benjamin Netanyahu; right Heinrich Himmler?

The Israeli NAZIS' Gaza assault is to steal Palestinian gas, avert Israeli energy crisis - The Guardian

According to the exit polls, Joko Widodo has won the presidential election in Indonesia, but, former CIA-asset General Prabowo may try to rig the vote.

Joko Widodo's victory in Indonesia ... - Sydney Morning Herald

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

6 Comments:

At 9 July 2014 at 11:49 , Anonymous Mike said...

"Mr Havers, who has appeared in Coronation Street, dismissed the claims..."

Corrie eh?
Wasn't there something fishy going on there a wee while ago?

 
At 9 July 2014 at 14:20 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sir Michael Havers, brother of Baroness Butler-Sloss

Sir Michael Havers was appointed as Attorney General by Margaret Thatcher in 1979, and was made Baron Havers in 1987. He intervened three times between 1981 and 1983 to stop the investigation and exposure of Establishment paedophiles, and to prevent the publication of stories which showed that Establishment figures were members of the Paedophile Information Exchange.

Although none of this implicates Havers’ sister, Baroness Butler-Sloss,in any way, it seems at the very least deeply inappropriate to have someone heading a ‘historic’ child abuse inquiry whose own brother played such a major role in the protection of Establishment paedophiles throughout the 1980s.

Continues:

https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/showthread.php?273-The-Power-of-the-Paedos-another-high-profile-case-hits-the-never-happened-wall/page46

 
At 9 July 2014 at 15:34 , Anonymous Boxcutter McGee said...

So, Nobs, have you had the occasion to visit Spivey's site yet?

 
At 10 July 2014 at 14:13 , Blogger Spike1138 said...

"Communications data... have played a significant role in the investigation of many of the most serious crimes in recent times, including... the murder of Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman... Communications data can prove or disprove alibis, identify associations between potential criminals and tie suspects and victims to a crime scene." - The Evil, Shameless Liar Theresa May (Hansard)

This is the EXACT OPPOSITE of The Truth.

Ian Huntley is Completely Innocent, and mobile phone records (kept from the jury) prove that beyond any reasonable doubt.

http://spikethenews.blogspot.com/2014/07/theresa-may-pervert-of-justice.html

 
At 10 July 2014 at 14:23 , Blogger Spike1138 said...

Nigel Havers is, along with Bob Geldof KBE, one of the celebrity patrons for the Charity "Families Need Fathers", the political wing of the Fathers4Justice terrorist group a deeply mysogenistic pair of organisations that goes around attacking women, in particular single mothers, verbally and in print, and run in packs.

Geldof produced a (profoundly dishonest) documentary whitewashing his own experiences (and obvious guilt) in his Secruity Service-assisted custody battle with Paula Yates and later the Hutchence Family in 2003.

It's viewable here, as are scans and screen grabs from their in-house newsletter "McKenzie", demonstrating quite clearly from the Classified Ads that this is a paedophile front group with apparent ties to (at least) British and Israeli Intelligence running a network of safe houses in which abuse may be carried out.

http://spikethenews.blogspot.co.uk/2014/06/geldof-says-political.html

 
At 10 July 2014 at 22:37 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hullo? What? Yes?

Did I visit Chris Spivey's site? The answer is yes I did, what with the worthy Coleman having linked to him. To be honest I wasn't sure what to make of it all. The front page piece seemed interminable with far too much space and time devoted to calling people twats and cunts etc. and the rest of it not seeming to possess any clear logic beyond that of a meandering fancy.

I'm not saying I disagree with his premise that the Woolwich brouhaha was fake - I expect it was - but rather, from what I read I can't see him as being the chap to make the case. For mine, vehemence is no substitute for an elegant, logical, and easy-to-follow line of argument. In Spivey's case this vehemence equated to dust (from a 'dust-up', natch) obscuring whatever it was he wanted to show us.

Whilst one does admire confidence, I find that in the case of making an argument any statement by the author that acknowledges the possibility of not knowing, or of being wrong, or of having doubts, actually adds to their credibility rather than detracts from it. Just sayin'.

Otherwise, Spivey's inability to make the case aside I suspect he's an interesting chap and the kind of fellow one might have a beer with. But who knows? Since I had to scroll down for twenty minutes to read much ado about very little I doubt I'll be going back there unless someone links to something they consider particularly worthy.

Did that over-answer your question, ha ha?

Off I go now, whoosh etc. etc.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home