HOW TO EXPLAIN THE WORLD
At its best after 4 minutes.
How to explain the world?
0 = +x -x
Particles are constantly popping in and out of existence, according to the scientists.
The +x -x could be seen as representing all possible things.
According to the scientists, a bottle of Coke exists in all possible locations, until it is observed existing in one particular location.
Atom Is Seen in 2 Places at Once - New York Times
"The world has the incomprehensible property of existing in a 'superposition' of possible states and every so often plumps for one or another."
Can Quantum Mechanics Explain Free Will?
Jean Piaget[7] stated that young children have to learn about time and space.
Particles appear to exist in all states simultaneously according to the experiments in quantum superposition
Atom Is Seen in 2 Places at Once - New York Times
The observer apparently decides where the bottle of Coke is to be found.
And, just as a bottle of Coke can be in more than one place at once, it can also be in more than one time period at once.
The observer apparently decides the time period in which the bottle of Coke is to be found.
Our understanding of time and space may be out of date, according to the scientists.
Can Quantum Mechanics Explain Free Will?
There is a lion somewhere ahead of us.
Perhaps we observe it right in front of us, about to eat us.
Or, perhaps we observe it sitting peacefully, eating manna from heaven.
"Experiments in quantum physics seem to demonstrate the need for an observer to be present to make potentialities become real...
"Basically, what quantum theory says is that fundamental particles are empty of inherent existence and exist in an undefined state of potentialities.
"They have no inherent existence from their own side and do not become 'real' until a mind interacts with them and gives them meaning.
"Whenever and wherever there is no mind there is no meaning and no reality."
The above film is controversial and it has been argued that the authors do not understand quantum physics.
Richard Dawkins stated that "the authors seem undecided whether their theme is quantum theory or consciousness. Both are indeed mysterious, and their genuine mystery needs none of the hype with which this film relentlessly and noisily belabours us", concluding that the film is "tosh".
Some ideas discussed in the film are:
3. Matter is not solid.
4. Electrons pop in and out of existence and it is unknown where they disappear to.
Richard Dawkins stated that "the authors seem undecided whether their theme is quantum theory or consciousness. Both are indeed mysterious, and their genuine mystery needs none of the hype with which this film relentlessly and noisily belabours us", concluding that the film is "tosh".
Some ideas discussed in the film are:
2. "Empty space" is not empty.
3. Matter is not solid.
4. Electrons pop in and out of existence and it is unknown where they disappear to.
5. Beliefs about who one is and what is real are a direct cause of oneself and of one's own realities.
6. In the narrative segments of the movie, Marlee Matlin portrays Amanda, a photographer who plays the role of everywoman as she experiences her life from startlingly new and different perspectives.
In the documentary segments of the film, interviewees discuss the roots and meaning of Amanda's experiences.
The comments focus primarily on a single theme: We create our own reality.
Labels: 0 = +x-x, free will, observer, quantum, space, time, What the bleep do we know
posted by Anon @ 22:53
6 Comments
6 Comments:
I don't think I've ever known a film that set people on edge negatively (or positively, for a rare few) than "What The Bleep...". There are still reverberations from it in my life, on the basis of people's reaction to it (some of whom hadn't even seen it, and won't to this day). Even mentioning Joe Dispenza or his books [http://www.drjoedispenza.com [ will get you a raised eyebrow. I think it's because of the implication that not only can one take responsibility, but that one must.
NATO Allegations of Russian Tanks in Ukraine based on Fake Evidence
http://www.globalresearch.ca/nato-allegations-of-russian-tanks-in-ukraine-based-on-fake-evidence/5387160
Kiev Regime Atrocities in East Ukraine: The Bombing of Slavyank, “You kill women. You are killing children”. Video Evidence
http://www.globalresearch.ca/kiev-regime-atrocities-in-east-ukraine-the-bombing-of-slavyank-you-kill-women-you-are-killing-children-video-evidence/5387142
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2657873/Uncovered-American-duplicity-finally-explodes-myth-Special-Relationship-How-US-discussed-blasting-hell-UK-forces-Suez-Crisis-shameful-betrayals-historic-alliance.html
we talked about these matters first time in a long while yesterday evening on a pier by the docks. my opinion is that there is space beyond time and time beyond space. the border might be the kind that technology will never cross it - yet the mind has crossed the boundary both ways, always
Nikola Tesla Quotes
- Money does not represent such a value as men have placed upon it. All my money has been invested into experiments with which I have made new discoveries enabling mankind to have a little easier life.
- I hold that space cannot be curved, for the simple reason that it can have no properties. It might as well be said that God has properties. He has not, but only attributes and these are of our own making. Of properties we can only speak when dealing with matter filling the space. To say that in the presence of large bodies space becomes curved is equivalent to stating that something can act upon nothing. I, for one, refuse to subscribe to such a view.
- Today's scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality.
- The scientists from Franklin to Morse were clear thinkers and did not produce erroneous theories. The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite insane.
- Einsteins relativity work is a magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates, dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying errors. The theory is like a beggar clothed in purple whom ignorant people take for a king... its exponents are brilliant men but they are metaphysicists rather than scientists.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home