Unknown commented on "Symphony of Realities - ACT 11 - MECHANICS OF THE MATRIX - Part 1 of 2"
The Global Consciousness Project Dot -
proving that common thinking & mental energy affect reality
Interesting & fun bit of science created at Princeton University in the 1990s and running since then, is the 'Global Consciousness Project' or 'GCP', which seems to have slowly been proving that our collective thoughts and mental focus do alter reality.
The fun part is that at all times on the web, you can look at a big dot which changes colours in real-time, shading from a 'cool' blue at one end to a 'hot' red at the other, and giving a possible indication of how intense global common consciousness is at the moment -
the simple GCP Dot web page -
https://gcpdot.com/
Here's a compact screenshot image of the key part of the page, with the dot and the colour graph, the dot here captured mid-range at green (it changes often)
https://i.postimg.cc/901x4y3z/gcp-dot-princeton.jpg
Many of us like to look at the dot occasionally, see what colour is current, and contemplate what it might mean
The GCP Dot website doesn't explain it very simply, but here is the gist of it -
When we think and feel, our brains are active electrically. There is a lot of subtlety to 'electricity' at a very micron-level, so it extends rather beyond our bodies. The classic notion 'we affect those around us'.
The clever theory of the Princeton group, was that intense human consciousness activity, would be able to very subtly affect machines running electrically, specifically computers and their 'Random Number Generators' or 'RNGs'.
On a purely local level we wouldn't see much, but with huge samples around the world, a huge volume of data, the scientists guessed we could spot changes in number patterns, during major events that focused the minds of hundreds of millions of people.
Indeed, this turned out to be the case. Sometimes, the high volume of 'random numbers' are much less random, as seen by statistical analysis.
This was seen in events such as 9-11, the death of Nelson Mandela, and so on. The nature of humanity, is that often negative events bring out the mental energy, but positive collective focus can also do so.
The dot in 'cool blue' means that random numbers are as expected, 'small variance' as the chart says, not so much that is intensively bonding people's minds. At the other end, orange or red are 'large variance', numbers much less random, with something 'coherent' occurring in shared thought and emotion that is strong enough to alter machines making random numbers.
Sometimes people see the dot suddenly red and holding and start asking ... what could be going on?
As the chart says, 'Please don't strongly interpret the dot!' It's just something ... but it seems it's not nothing either.
Many of us like to look at the dot occasionally, see what colour is current, and contemplate what it might mean
The GCP Dot website doesn't explain it very simply, but here is the gist of it -
When we think and feel, our brains are active electrically. There is a lot of subtlety to 'electricity' at a very micron-level, so it extends rather beyond our bodies. The classic notion 'we affect those around us'.
The clever theory of the Princeton group, was that intense human consciousness activity, would be able to very subtly affect machines running electrically, specifically computers and their 'Random Number Generators' or 'RNGs'.
On a purely local level we wouldn't see much, but with huge samples around the world, a huge volume of data, the scientists guessed we could spot changes in number patterns, during major events that focused the minds of hundreds of millions of people.
Indeed, this turned out to be the case. Sometimes, the high volume of 'random numbers' are much less random, as seen by statistical analysis.
This was seen in events such as 9-11, the death of Nelson Mandela, and so on. The nature of humanity, is that often negative events bring out the mental energy, but positive collective focus can also do so.
The dot in 'cool blue' means that random numbers are as expected, 'small variance' as the chart says, not so much that is intensively bonding people's minds. At the other end, orange or red are 'large variance', numbers much less random, with something 'coherent' occurring in shared thought and emotion that is strong enough to alter machines making random numbers.
Sometimes people see the dot suddenly red and holding and start asking ... what could be going on?
As the chart says, 'Please don't strongly interpret the dot!' It's just something ... but it seems it's not nothing either.
~~~~~~~
No comments:
Post a Comment