'"I killed them on purpose because I’m not good enough for them and I am a horrible evil person. I don’t deserve Mum and Dad. World is better off without me."
'Letby claimed the note was not a confession and that she wrote it after being moved off the unit, in July 2016, because she was struggling with being blamed for something she hadn’t done.
Lucy Letby's handwritten confession leaves experts baffled ...
###########################
...
Nurse Lucy Letby worked at the Countess of Chester Hospital in Chester.
(Medical director Ian Harvey and chief executive Tony Chambers.)
She was found guilty of murdering seven infants and attempting to murder six others.
Anonymous said...
Euthanasia of disabled infants is thought to go on fairly often tho not 'authorised' ... is that in play here?
One juror was sent home 'for good reason' ... and the judge also allowed the verdict 'did not need to be unanimous' ... jurors argued for 15 days, there was obviously doubt
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-merseyside-66220792
Anonymous said...
Looks like a fit up aang "I in no way mean to belittle the experiences of parents involved in this case, but in the constant chest-beating, polemic attacks and emotional pleading many questions have gone unanswered. These questions include:
Why is it police have focused only on the 1/3rd of infants who died at CoCH during 2015/16 that they could, in some cases only quite tenuously, link to the sometimes inconsistently reported presence of Lucy Letby?
Where are the investigations of the other 2/3rds of neonates that died on the neonatal unit at CoCH and who doctors and police admit, did so in sometimes very similar circumstances and even in the months after Letby was removed from clinical practice?
Why was the hospital building so quickly scheduled for a complete refit and remodel, and then so rapidly moved along for complete destruction and replacement?
Why is it similar unexplained deaths continued in the months after Letby was removed from clinical practice and no longer had access to the unit?
Why is it these excess deaths only stopped after the aged consultant, Dr Gibbs, had retired and was replaced? What relationship does the fact that he was ‘one foot out the door’ for most of the period have to the entire collection of neonates who died in the unit?
Is it possible, as I have previously demonstrated, that there are other causes for these neonates deaths that remain hitherto unexplored?
Was the building’s destruction intended, as I have previously intimated, to destroy any and all evidence that the ongoing plumbing issues had resulted in colonisation of hospital wastewater (HWW) pathogens that are common causes of neonatal death in such units?
Over the next few weeks I will resume my exploration of the evidence. However, until like-minded people band together, identify and provide appeal-experienced legal support and begin the process of unravelling what I for one believe to be a gross miscarriage of justice…
We will never know the true answers to any of these questions. "
https://lawhealthandtech.substack.com/p/lucy-letby-found-guilty
Personally I think this whole Lucy Letby thing is just another distracting hoax. Unless she is scapegoating for smb else.
ReplyDeleteSo, she was killing babies for a very long time to distract us ? From what ? Don't be silly.
ReplyDelete100% pysop
ReplyDeletelooks like a fit up aang "I in no way mean to belittle the experiences of parents involved in this case, but in the constant chest-beating, polemic attacks and emotional pleading many questions have gone unanswered. These questions include:
ReplyDeleteWhy is it police have focused only on the 1/3rd of infants who died at CoCH during 2015/16 that they could, in some cases only quite tenuously, link to the sometimes inconsistently reported presence of Lucy Letby?
Where are the investigations of the other 2/3rds of neonates that died on the neonatal unit at CoCH and who doctors and police admit, did so in sometimes very similar circumstances and even in the months after Letby was removed from clinical practice?
Why was the hospital building so quickly scheduled for a complete refit and remodel, and then so rapidly moved along for complete destruction and replacement?
Why is it similar unexplained deaths continued in the months after Letby was removed from clinical practice and no longer had access to the unit?
Why is it these excess deaths only stopped after the aged consultant, Dr Gibbs, had retired and was replaced? What relationship does the fact that he was ‘one foot out the door’ for most of the period have to the entire collection of neonates who died in the unit?
Is it possible, as I have previously demonstrated, that there are other causes for these neonates deaths that remain hitherto unexplored?
Was the building’s destruction intended, as I have previously intimated, to destroy any and all evidence that the ongoing plumbing issues had resulted in colonisation of hospital wastewater (HWW) pathogens that are common causes of neonatal death in such units?
Over the next few weeks I will resume my exploration of the evidence. However, until like-minded people band together, identify and provide appeal-experienced legal support and begin the process of unravelling what I for one believe to be a gross miscarriage of justice…
We will never know the true answers to any of these questions. "
https://lawhealthandtech.substack.com/p/lucy-letby-found-guilty
Scapegoat perhaps?
ReplyDeleteMedical Director and CHIEF EXECUTIVE exist primarily to collect paychecks, honors and deflect accountability NOT to ensure patient safety or in these cases, the most vulnerable patients’ wellbeing.
Israeli embassy officials attempted to influence UK court cases, documents suggest
ReplyDeletehttps://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/aug/20/israeli-embassy-officials-attempted-to-influence-uk-court-cases-documents-suggest
https://www.judiciaryreport.com/alan_keyes_calls_obama_a_nairobi_usurper.htm
ReplyDeleteSo u were there when she was killing babies? Are u ready to swear this is the truth because you are told so?
ReplyDeleteBeverley Gail Allitt
ReplyDeleteLucy Letby is being discussed on 4chan, many agree something is wrong
ReplyDeleteIt's said she didn't show up to protest her innocence at sentencing - why not?
One wonders more and more if prisoners are drugged up etc as part of managing the 'show' in courtrooms, so defences are weak ... lawyers also part of the 'show' sometimes, that is clear
It's said she had an affair with a doctor, un-named ... is she covering for others, maybe receiving some 'promise' (future release on technicality etc) which may or may not be honoured?
Euthanasia of disabled infants is thought to go on fairly often tho not 'authorised' ... is that in play here?
One juror was sent home 'for good reason' ... and the judge also allowed the verdict 'did not need to be unanimous' ... jurors argued for 15 days, there was obviously doubt
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-merseyside-66220792
Never bothered to follow this latest show. Apparently, according to the Daily Mail..................
ReplyDeleteLetby, 33, is Britain's most prolific child killer and was yesterday sentenced to an unprecedented 14 whole life orders - meaning she will die in prison.
Imagine having to spend the rest of your life in jail when you are only "33".