Embattled BBC presenter hit with fresh claims as he is branded a 'complete hypocrite for breaking lockdown rules to see 23-year-old he met on a dating site and gave £650 to' - while a FOURTH person says star sent 'creepy' messages to them on Instagram
Third person describes no crime, they just describe an inappropriate relationship strategy. Maybe they should give a big downvote on the dating app they met them on?
ReplyDeleteHe seems to have been found guilty of:
ReplyDelete1. Extramarital relationships (with his wife’s knowledge & approval or without it is unclear at this point)
2. Gayness
3. Being closeted
4. Having a ‘ridiculous’ amount of disposable income, more than he apparently knows how to sensibly spend
5. Perceived Pomposity/ working for the insufferable BBC
6. Big time indiscretion
7. Major lack of self awareness
8. Bouts of petulance
Not really sure what else at this point…
Worse than the sins of the average BBC or public sector employee? Or indeed worse than the sins of the average Sun or Daily Mail reader or BBC licence fee payer?
Enough to warrant the death penalty?
Or ritual humiliation for his next degree in Masonry.
DeletePerfect timing for a media shit show to keep Zelensky's relationship with MI6 off the front pages
ReplyDeleteAllegedly … The Astonishing relationship of MI6 and Zelensky
https://tapnewswire.com/2023/07/all-alone-now-corrupt-loser-zelensky-has-no-friends/
Lockdown rules were never laws. At best they were regulations. Nobody broke the law.
ReplyDeleteFake news, distraction, ritual humiliation. Nobody pays 35 grand to look at someone naked.
ReplyDeleteHomosexual men are extremely promiscuous and rent boys are ten a penny. I'm sure for a handful of Es, a gram of coke and 50 quid they'd do practically anything.
Seriously though, it just doesn't add up.