Tuesday, 11 April 2023

STUDY PULLED

 

Anonymous -

A study that claimed that Covid jabs have killed 280,000 people in the US has been PULLED

“The publisher of some of the world's most prestigious scientific journals has today sensationally RETRACTED a study that wrongly [sic] claimed Covid vaccines have killed up to 280,000 people across the US …”

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-11960667/Hugely-contentious-study-claimed-Covid-jabs-killed-280-000-people-gets-pulled.html

Mark Skidmore is Professor of Economics at Michigan State University where he holds the Morris Chair in State and Local Government Finance and Policy.

He has addressed the astonishing retraction of his work:

‘The Retraction of the Skidmore (2023) Article on Covid Vaccine Uptake and Injuries’

https://mark-skidmore.com/2023/04/05/the-retraction-of-the-skidmore-2023-article-on-covid-vaccine-uptake-and-injuries/

“Is it possible that the primary reason these three articles received a vote of no confidence is because they offer evidence that contradict the assertion by government officials that the COVID-19 vaccines are safe? I leave it to the reader to make his/her own assessment.”

https://mark-skidmore.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Retraction-Update-for-the-Public.pdf

2 comments:

  1. Much as in climate science, this kind of controversy is likely to accelerate the push toward online publishing with in-effect public BTL review of the manuscript. It is now reasonably clear that 150 dispassionate public reviewers provide every bit as rigorous an assessment as two or three, often conflicted, 'referees' at 'peer-reviewed journals'.

    ReplyDelete
  2. One of the comments concerns 'a conflict of interest for the funder of the research, Catherine Austin Fitts'. I would provocatively and rigorously suggest that every single piece of research funded by NIH, branches of NIH or other government agencies in the USA is conflicted due to the position of the Biden Administration on mRNA vaccines.

    ReplyDelete