Rachel Meghan Markle was a 'yacht girl' and there are even pix of her so employed. Allegedly she was part of the conceptual network of Epstein-style sex operations linking quasi-call girl/ models/ actresses to rich and powerful men of influence; Same networkd that also linked Trump to his current model wife Melania (whom Epstein always bragged 2 decades ago he was the one that introduced them). So form this angle? Who is Markle really? Another tool of the Illuminati playing a part. But what is her part really? Tha has only just begun to come into view
Has anyone every considered the notion that Markle was Harry's "breakaway" from the Royal family/protocol instead of all this being Markle's doing? I have a tendency to believe that Harry's father is NOT Prince Charles and that HARRY was deeply affected by his mother's death and all that came with it and before it. As he and William entered into adulthood, is the notion that these two boys did not do any investigating into their mom's death? Does everyone really feel that these boys were not affected by the fact that their father ended up marrying the woman with whom he was having an affair with behind Diana's back? I think HARRY knew quite a bit through educating himself and through inside information. He decided the "royal life" was not how he wanted to live. So he exited. And he had someone by his side who supported his decision 100% because SHE TOO went through hell in the short amount of time she spent trying to assimilate to the "royal lifestyle". This isn't on her. This was Harry. His decision for his own personal reasons. She did not "lure" him off the track. He probably wanted out long before he even met her. He was NOT going to allow the media to do to his wife what they did to his mother. Good for him. THAT, my friends, is a real man.
Suggestion is her job is to confirm the 'endemic racism'in British society. Can't have black and white shoulder to shoulder against the establishment. Even though kids in the Lothians and Rhondda Valley face same future as mixed race Londoners and sing the same grimey hymns.
Shes not black though, and on her resume she lives as caucasion. To be blk both parents have to be. Im a woc and for markle to now play that card, it is insulting, shes mixed race, not black
There possibly is an element of racism, but I think the major reason is class. Markle has no class whatsoever; she comes from nowhere, had been married a couple of times already and had appeared in some trashy movies, but the Brits would prefer to be accused of racism than of snobbery.
I have seen the vid years ago but there are quite a few issues beside the point, the main point in connection to the British royals:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6K9t9WamaVE
Elisabeth II is second to none? Not really. In this vid of 2013 she vists the Bank of England in the City of London. Indeed as the y-tube intro txt says: Evelyn R. and / or Jacob R. should have received her, instead of their personnel.
+++
https://imgflip.com/i/16f9ps
“Evelyn de Rothschild pokes Prince Charles: I´m Evelyn de RotSchild, Charlie Boy, you´ll do whatever the hell I tell you to do”
+++
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zXlD_xFncJY
The Bank of England - like the FED of the US and all the central banks of the world - is privately (j) owned, it is owned by the RotSchild cartel.
Bank of England Act 1946 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bank_of_England_Act_1946
The Bank of England Act 1946 (c 27) is an Act of Parliament of the United Kingdom which came into force on 14 February 1946. The Act brought all of the stock of the Bank of England into public ownership on the "appointed date" (1 March 1946). This was one of a series of nationalisations by the post-war Labour government led by Clement Attlee.[1]
Hansard - Bank of England Act 1946 https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/acts/bank-of-england-act-1946
dude, you need to find better people to get your information from, if your going to trawl just about anyone please start checking they are right before reposting their assertions.
Read what ´NewsNotShownonTV´ who uploaded this vid writes, he disproves your point:
" Proof Bank of England is privately owned is found on their website: Actually, as of the end of Q1 2016, the BoE owns 31.003% due largely to aggressive QE since the GFC. Over seas holdings, which comprises foreign institutional investors (foreign banks, hedge funds, ETFs and mutual funds), stands at 35.004%. Foreign Central Bank holdings comprise 5.783%. Banks in Scotland, English Banks and the insurance industry own the remaining 28.21%. (source: Debt Management Office, BoE) These trading and foreign banks prove the Bank of England is not owned by the British taxpayers. It's ownership is private and Jewish."
" Channel 4 the Great Britain newschannel missed all the real news points and the issues upon the Queen's visit to the bank of England in 2013. When Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip visited the Bank of England - the British Channel 4 Press inferred that by her asking questions about the financial crisis - she may be interfering with the Bank of England. Meanwhile the Rothschild owners of the Bank of England were absent."
The RotSchild & co cartel were at first "Hofjuden" of most of the Euro royals. ow the Euroroyals are their lackeys.
Lionell Nathan Rotschild married queen Victoria. And took over the British royal house:
Read what the great queen Victoria writes:
"...I come from a long line of syphlitics and mental defectives, I represent a puppet monarchy for the Jewish International bankers, my hamily is so interbred with the Rothschilds, we are a subset of the Rothschilds, we all live together at Belgravia, and we are used to create war, whenever our relatives the International Bankers require it for profit."
" Proof Bank of England is privately owned is found on their website: Actually, as of the end of Q1 2016, the BoE owns 31.003% due largely to aggressive QE since the GFC. Over seas holdings, which comprises foreign institutional investors (foreign banks, hedge funds, ETFs and mutual funds), stands at 35.004%. Foreign Central Bank holdings comprise 5.783%. Banks in Scotland, English Banks and the insurance industry own the remaining 28.21%. (source: Debt Management Office, BoE) These trading and foreign banks prove the Bank of England is not owned by the British taxpayers. It's ownership is private and Jewish."
Holdings are a form of deposit and are not a measure of ownership. I'm happy with what I posted earlier and maybe in time you will be too. Until then, you will have to argue it out with yourself.
In their own words: " Who owns the Bank of England today? We are wholy-owned by the UK government. The capital of the Bank is held by the Treasury Solicitor on behalf of HM Treasury. Although we are owned by HM Treasury, we carry out our responsibilities independently."
"we carry out responsabilities independently" the crux of the matter."
On the facebook page of the RotSchild foundation, England, GB is indeed missing in the list of RotSchild CB´s, the butcher judging the quality, quantity of his own meat.
On paper (which is nope) they may be not owner, but that does not mean that they don´t control the BOE, the Central Bank of GB that prints and mints all the money.
It is therefore simply wrong to state that Rothschild owns all Central Banks!
"This is important, because getting straightforward facts like these wrong is clearly damaging the credibility of conspiracy theorists."
In his afterthought he writes:
"However, the basic proposition of the article, that it is wrong to say that Rothschild owns all CB’s and that it’s about control more than it is about ownership, still stands."
The RotSchild cartel may on paper (1946) be not the owner of the BoE (as most European banks after the war as AM writes) but they sure are the controller of the financial markets on which the "publicly owned" BoE operates.
The BoE is not a false label, it is owned by England not by the RotSchild cartel but the RotSchild cartel is indirectly its real mover & shaker, it is indirectly the owner.
+++
When I was in Holland last nov-jan I talked to a woman who just went home after her 9-5 job leaving the building of Autoriteit Financiele Markten in Amsterdam Authority Financial Markets. Indeed, she worked there. I said to her, a funny name this institution, because anyone who does a little internet research will know about the real authority of the j-bankers etc. Which she did not deny, of course.
I told her in another mnute to watch 5 G Apocalyps Extinction event, she did not know all these dangers yet. I will certainly watch she said.
Afterthought: Who is behind 5 G ? Not the public the on paper owners of the BoE etc.
After the 5 G roll out all their money will go to Big Pharma another claw of the RotSchild octopus.
There ´ll be no money left for cake at the funeral (that´s a custom in the Netherlands).
BOE creates 3% (down from 5%) of the UK money supply - all of the notes and coins - these in turn are lent to the banks at interest. BOE collects the interest on the notes and coins and pays it to the treasury. - the other 97% is created by the Banks through lending.
The global mechanism that manages Central Banks is the Bank for International Settlements is Basel, Switzerland. BIS are a whole topic of reasearch in themselves, of which I've done little.
Do the Rothchilds have or buy influence in the world? From what I've watched and read my opinion is yes but I have not researched them and have no conclusive proof.
This 1 hour documentary is a theory about events that took place during the 2008 crash, focusing in particular on HSBC bank. It involves HMG Treasury, BOE, BIS, US Treasury and DOJ. All of the documents in the documentary I have tracked down online and all of the section text as displayed in the show are correct. Even if the theory is not 100% accurate I learnt a lot from watching and researcing it.
All the Plenary's Men - John Titus [56:42] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2gK3s5j7PgA
In an effort to keep the running time to under an hour John seems to power through his presentation, I had to watch multiple times to take it all in.
Here's an interview with John about his documentary (not endorsing Keiser) other interviews are available online.
Keiser Report: Financialized Economy (E1088) [25:46] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfeAhYUWSas
Rachel Meghan Markle was a 'yacht girl' and there are even pix of her so employed. Allegedly she was part of the conceptual network of Epstein-style sex operations linking quasi-call girl/ models/ actresses to rich and powerful men of influence; Same networkd that also linked Trump to his current model wife Melania (whom Epstein always bragged 2 decades ago he was the one that introduced them).
ReplyDeleteSo form this angle? Who is Markle really? Another tool of the Illuminati playing a part. But what is her part really? Tha has only just begun to come into view
https://sun9-26.userapi.com/c846521/v846521632/1c24b7/zmgW8y4HOYw.jpg
DeleteThe photo of Harry in the link you provide is photoshoped (see link below), if Harry is fake I'm taking it that the wife's pic is photoshoped to.
DeleteOriginal photo for Harry;
http://www.ugle.org.uk/images/whos-who/Untitled.jpg
https://cloudstatic.eva.ru/eva/520000-530000/526792/channel/21879699_968493956648026_47376306172_39775694182925833.jpg?H
Deletehttps://medialeaks.ru/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/princeharry-02-600x400.jpg
https://sun9-57.userapi.com/c850532/v850532825/6b1b5/2FmGvFr_1tc.jpg
Deletehttps://sun9-34.userapi.com/c858528/v858528302/d64f0/ZJatf0-AF00.jpg
Deletehttps://n1s1.hsmedia.ru/fd/90/9e/fd909e23f604584cb8ecc007215818a3/330x500_0xac120003_13730627101562648800.jpg
Deletehttps://n1s1.hsmedia.ru/62/f3/c5/62f3c5bb47db784d312734eef348888f/330x500_0xac120003_18165167291562648800.jpg
Has anyone every considered the notion that Markle was Harry's "breakaway" from the Royal family/protocol instead of all this being Markle's doing? I have a tendency to believe that Harry's father is NOT Prince Charles and that HARRY was deeply affected by his mother's death and all that came with it and before it. As he and William entered into adulthood, is the notion that these two boys did not do any investigating into their mom's death? Does everyone really feel that these boys were not affected by the fact that their father ended up marrying the woman with whom he was having an affair with behind Diana's back? I think HARRY knew quite a bit through educating himself and through inside information. He decided the "royal life" was not how he wanted to live. So he exited. And he had someone by his side who supported his decision 100% because SHE TOO went through hell in the short amount of time she spent trying to assimilate to the "royal lifestyle". This isn't on her. This was Harry. His decision for his own personal reasons. She did not "lure" him off the track. He probably wanted out long before he even met her. He was NOT going to allow the media to do to his wife what they did to his mother. Good for him. THAT, my friends, is a real man.
DeleteSuggestion is her job is to confirm the 'endemic racism'in British society. Can't have black and white shoulder to shoulder against the establishment. Even though kids in the Lothians and Rhondda Valley face same future as mixed race Londoners and sing the same grimey hymns.
ReplyDeleteShes not black though, and on her resume she lives as caucasion.
DeleteTo be blk both parents have to be.
Im a woc and for markle to now play that card, it is insulting, shes mixed race, not black
Check Out:
ReplyDeletehttps://archive.org/details/DopeInc.BritainOpiumWarAgainstTheUs1978.pdfVersion2/page/n83/mode/2up
There possibly is an element of racism, but I think the major reason is class. Markle has no class whatsoever; she comes from nowhere, had been married a couple of times already and had appeared in some trashy movies, but the Brits would prefer to be accused of racism than of snobbery.
ReplyDeleteDid Germaine Greer ever asked herself the question that this vid poses?
ReplyDeletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=4&v=6TDK1TH0AgA&feature=emb_logo
Why would a naked boy be escaping from Buckingham palace ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=218&v=gUBWkMvlEKw&feature=emb_logo
ReplyDeleteDavid Icke Two Hour Special Royal Political Paedophilia How the Global Pieces Fit
https://humansarefree.com/2018/09/aboriginal-survivor-says-the-queen-of-england-abducted-children-in-canada-assassinated-before-he-could-testify.html
https://humansarefree.com/2018/09/aboriginal-survivor-says-the-queen-of-england-abducted-children-in-canada-assassinated-before-he-could-testify.html
ReplyDeleteCheck out:
ReplyDeletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uTmwFY2Tndw
Queen of England scares away child, dec. 2018 , Canada
https://www.disclose.tv/adrenochrome-the-secret-drug-all-the-illuminati-use-324656
People were wondering what she was doing in a white dress and especially a veil at the wedding.
ReplyDeleteIt wasn't racism.
ReplyDeleteCheck out:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.woowoomedia.com/scrubbed-from-the-net-queen-elizabeths-staff-says-shes-not-human-screenshots-prove-it/
+++
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZrDq_Ca_n1s
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2083872/Body-Queens-Sandringham-estate-identified-Alisa-Dmitrijeva.html
Last line of the article:"The Queen and the Duke of Edinburgh were in residence at Sandringham when the body was discovered."
My guess is Harry & Meghan don´t want to be a part of this.
If you have not already seen this, it all UK Royals and connections
ReplyDeleteRING OF POWER II THE ZION KING [2:54:48]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mKoN81ySw2k
and if you want more...
RING OF POWER 1 - EMPIRE OF THE CITY [4:55:25]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2-kNXwCBkb4
@ Anonymous15 February 2020 at 07:50
ReplyDeleteI have seen the vid years ago but there are quite a few issues beside the point, the main point in connection to the British royals:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6K9t9WamaVE
Elisabeth II is second to none? Not really. In this vid of 2013 she vists the Bank of England in the City of London. Indeed as the y-tube intro txt says: Evelyn R. and / or Jacob R. should have received her, instead of their personnel.
+++
https://imgflip.com/i/16f9ps
“Evelyn de Rothschild pokes Prince Charles: I´m Evelyn de RotSchild, Charlie Boy, you´ll do whatever the hell I tell you to do”
+++
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zXlD_xFncJY
The Bank of England - like the FED of the US and all the central banks of the world - is privately (j) owned, it is owned by the RotSchild cartel.
Just a few mouse click's aaaaaand........
ReplyDeleteBank of England Act 1946
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bank_of_England_Act_1946
The Bank of England Act 1946 (c 27) is an Act of Parliament of the United Kingdom which came into force on 14 February 1946. The Act brought all of the stock of the Bank of England into public ownership on the "appointed date" (1 March 1946). This was one of a series of nationalisations by the post-war Labour government led by Clement Attlee.[1]
Hansard - Bank of England Act 1946
https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/acts/bank-of-england-act-1946
dude, you need to find better people to get your information from, if your going to trawl just about anyone please start checking they are right before reposting their assertions.
@ Anonymous17 February 2020 at 13:49
ReplyDeleteRead what ´NewsNotShownonTV´ who uploaded this vid writes, he disproves your point:
" Proof Bank of England is privately owned is found on their website: Actually, as of the end of Q1 2016, the BoE owns 31.003% due largely to aggressive QE since the GFC. Over seas holdings, which comprises foreign institutional investors (foreign banks, hedge funds, ETFs and mutual funds), stands at 35.004%. Foreign Central Bank holdings comprise 5.783%. Banks in Scotland, English Banks and the insurance industry own the remaining 28.21%. (source: Debt Management Office, BoE) These trading and foreign banks prove the Bank of England is not owned by the British taxpayers. It's ownership is private and Jewish."
" Channel 4 the Great Britain newschannel missed all the real news points and the issues upon the Queen's visit to the bank of England in 2013. When Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip visited the Bank of England - the British Channel 4 Press inferred that by her asking questions about the financial crisis - she may be interfering with the Bank of England. Meanwhile the Rothschild owners of the Bank of England were absent."
The RotSchild & co cartel were at first "Hofjuden" of most of the Euro royals. ow the Euroroyals are their lackeys.
The video is proof that the game has changed.
Check out:
Greg Halett
https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/11890157/104-how-to-take-over-the-world-greg-hallett-and-spymaster
Lionell Nathan Rotschild married queen Victoria. And took over the British royal house:
Read what the great queen Victoria writes:
"...I come from a long line of syphlitics and mental defectives,
I represent a puppet monarchy for the Jewish International bankers, my hamily is so interbred with the Rothschilds, we are a subset of the Rothschilds, we all live together at Belgravia, and we are used to create war, whenever our relatives the International Bankers require it for profit."
H.A.N.D. Have A Nice Day, amego.
" Proof Bank of England is privately owned is found on their website: Actually, as of the end of Q1 2016, the BoE owns 31.003% due largely to aggressive QE since the GFC. Over seas holdings, which comprises foreign institutional investors (foreign banks, hedge funds, ETFs and mutual funds), stands at 35.004%. Foreign Central Bank holdings comprise 5.783%. Banks in Scotland, English Banks and the insurance industry own the remaining 28.21%. (source: Debt Management Office, BoE) These trading and foreign banks prove the Bank of England is not owned by the British taxpayers. It's ownership is private and Jewish."
DeleteHoldings are a form of deposit and are not a measure of ownership. I'm happy with what I posted earlier and maybe in time you will be too. Until then, you will have to argue it out with yourself.
@ Anonymous18 February 2020 at 05:12
ReplyDeleteIn their own words: " Who owns the Bank of England today? We are wholy-owned by the UK government. The capital of the Bank is held by the Treasury Solicitor on behalf of HM Treasury. Although we are owned by HM Treasury, we carry out our responsibilities independently."
"we carry out responsabilities independently" the crux of the matter."
On the facebook page of the RotSchild foundation, England, GB is indeed missing in the list of RotSchild CB´s, the butcher judging the quality, quantity of his own meat.
On paper (which is nope) they may be not owner, but that does not mean that they don´t control the BOE, the Central Bank of GB that prints and mints all the money.
+++
https://realcurrencies.wordpress.com/2013/07/15/does-rothschild-own-all-central-banks/
It is therefore simply wrong to state that Rothschild owns all Central Banks!
"This is important, because getting straightforward facts like these wrong is clearly damaging the credibility of conspiracy theorists."
In his afterthought he writes:
"However, the basic proposition of the article, that it is wrong to say that Rothschild owns all CB’s and that it’s about control more than it is about ownership, still stands."
The RotSchild cartel may on paper (1946) be not the owner of the BoE (as most European banks after the war as AM writes) but they sure are the controller of the financial markets on which the "publicly owned" BoE operates.
The BoE is not a false label, it is owned by England not by the RotSchild cartel but the RotSchild cartel is indirectly
its real mover & shaker, it is indirectly the owner.
+++
When I was in Holland last nov-jan I talked to a woman who just went home after her 9-5 job leaving the building of Autoriteit Financiele Markten in Amsterdam Authority Financial Markets.
Indeed, she worked there. I said to her, a funny name this institution, because anyone who does a little internet research will know about the real authority of the j-bankers etc. Which she did not deny, of course.
I told her in another mnute to watch 5 G Apocalyps Extinction event, she did not know all these dangers yet. I will certainly watch she said.
Afterthought: Who is behind 5 G ? Not the public the on paper owners of the BoE etc.
After the 5 G roll out all their money will go to Big Pharma another claw of the RotSchild octopus.
There ´ll be no money left for cake at the funeral (that´s a custom in the Netherlands).
BOE creates 3% (down from 5%) of the UK money supply - all of the notes and coins - these in turn are lent to the banks at interest. BOE collects the interest on the notes and coins and pays it to the treasury. - the other 97% is created by the Banks through lending.
ReplyDeleteThe global mechanism that manages Central Banks is the Bank for International Settlements is Basel, Switzerland. BIS are a whole topic of reasearch in themselves, of which I've done little.
Do the Rothchilds have or buy influence in the world? From what I've watched and read my opinion is yes but I have not researched them and have no conclusive proof.
This 1 hour documentary is a theory about events that took place during the 2008 crash, focusing in particular on HSBC bank. It involves HMG Treasury, BOE, BIS, US Treasury and DOJ. All of the documents in the documentary I have tracked down online and all of the section text as displayed in the show are correct. Even if the theory is not 100% accurate I learnt a lot from watching and researcing it.
All the Plenary's Men - John Titus [56:42]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2gK3s5j7PgA
In an effort to keep the running time to under an hour John seems to power through his presentation, I had to watch multiple times to take it all in.
Here's an interview with John about his documentary (not endorsing Keiser) other interviews are available online.
Keiser Report: Financialized Economy (E1088) [25:46]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfeAhYUWSas