He's much more genuine. Chomsky is a gatekeeper. He shuts down debate outside of saying "America" is wicked. He actually mocks and decries people who want to pursue who these people actually are or want to reassess ridiculous establishment narratives like 9/11; Here's a Chomsky quote. It says everything about how we are controlled, how we are lied to and where Chomsky himself stands in relation to the public good:
".....The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum - even encourage the more critical and dissident views. That gives people the sense that there's free thinking going on, while all the time the presuppositions of the system are being reinforced by the limits put on the range of the debate...."
Like Chomsky, Rudkowski never addresses (wildly disproportionate) Jewish influence over the disastrous political actions he condemns. This is almost the definition of a gatekeeper. He produces good stuff ........that will never have an immediate and powerful impact. Eventually the bull will have to be taken by the horns. The bull is the people with the money (and the way they use Israel and the captive brainwashed Jewish people across the world to advance their interests).
Pilger reminds me of Chomsky somehow.
ReplyDeleteGreat guys. I hope a new generation of people come along that will be as good as them. Luke Rudkowski of We Are Change looks promising.
DeleteHe's much more genuine. Chomsky is a gatekeeper. He shuts down debate outside of saying "America" is wicked. He actually mocks and decries people who want to pursue who these people actually are or want to reassess ridiculous establishment narratives like 9/11; Here's a Chomsky quote. It says everything about how we are controlled, how we are lied to and where Chomsky himself stands in relation to the public good:
Delete".....The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum - even encourage the more critical and dissident views. That gives people the sense that there's free thinking going on, while all the time the presuppositions of the system are being reinforced by the limits put on the range of the debate...."
Like Chomsky, Rudkowski never addresses (wildly disproportionate) Jewish influence over the disastrous political actions he condemns. This is almost the definition of a gatekeeper. He produces good stuff ........that will never have an immediate and powerful impact. Eventually the bull will have to be taken by the horns. The bull is the people with the money (and the way they use Israel and the captive brainwashed Jewish people across the world to advance their interests).
DeleteHere, John Pilfer interviews a Duanne Carriage who was head of CIA Latin American division. He is a psychopath.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SNgCyDsvi84