Former police officers are behind half of the claims that there has been a cover-up of child abuse by top people in the UK.
mirror /ex-cops
One retired officer says that in a search of a child abuser's home he found a document from the Houses of Parliament listing top people involved in a child sex ring.
Another retired police officer says that a police operation targeting rent boys in London's Dolphin Square was stopped 'due to officers being too near prominent people.'
London's Police are probing almost 30 allegations involving politicians and other top people.
...
Conservative Member of Parliament Zac Goldsmith, who hopes to become Mayor of London, says that there has been a cover-up.
Zac Goldsmith says that a 1982 police raid on the Elm Guest House found photographs of 'establishment figures who had visited the guest house, along with logbooks, names, times and dates detailing their attendance.
Zac Goldsmith says that the evidence obtained from Elm Guest House mysteriously disappeared.
...
Much of the UK's mainstream media has been involved in the cover-up of child abuse.
All the national newspapers have seen a drop in circulation between September 1014 and September 2015
The Sun -10.8%
Daily Mail -4.9%All the national newspapers have seen a drop in circulation between September 1014 and September 2015
The Sun -10.8%
The Daily Telegraph -4.9%
Financial Times -4.7%
Lord Northcliffe (Alfred Harmsworth), who died in mysterious circumstances.
The newspaper owner Lord Northcliffe liked to cover certain things up.
Lord Northcliffe's private secretary was the gay spy Scott Moncrieff.
Lord Northcliffe, who was related to the Rothschilds through marriage, owned a number of newspapers including The Times and the Daily Mail.
Northcliffe is linked to the cabal that started World War I.
Beginning in 1913, Wellington House in London was at the centre of a plan to 'create' public opinion.
Sir Edward Grey, the British Foreign Secretary, installed Lord Northcliffe as its director.
Funding was provided by the Royal family, the Rothchilds (related to Lord Northcliffe by marriage) and the Rockefellers.
Wellington House became the Tavistock Institute in 1921
In May 1920 Lord Northcliffe published an article in The Times about the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.
The article was entitled The Jewish Peril.
In 1921 Northcliffe became ill.
He complained he was being poisoned
The Protocols.
In 1921, the Times changed its mind and produced a series of articles suggesting the Protocols was a forgery.
On 14 August 1922 Lord Northcliffe died, aged 57.
The cause of death stated was 'ulcerative endocarditis'..
The John JACOB Astor took over the Times in 1922.
The Times became very clearly pro-Zionist.
Harold Harmsworth with Hitler.
Lord Northcliffe was born Alfred Harmsworth.
Working alongside Alfred was his brother Harold Harmsworth, who becameLord Rothermere.
The Harmsworth newspapers championed the British Union of Fascists, many of whose leaders were actually Jewish.
John Beckett (British Union Director of Publications), Bill Leaper (Editor of the Blackshirt), Harold Soref (later Tory M.P. for Ormskirk), and the Jewish boxer Kid Lewis all supported Oswald Mosley and his fascist Blackshirts.
Rothermere wrote a Daily Mail editorial entitled "Hurrah for the Blackshirts", praising Oswald Mosley.
Rothermere visited and corresponded with Hitler.
Rothermere visited and corresponded with Hitler.
~~
THE GAY FATHER OF NAZISM AND ZIONISM.
Oswald Mosley's nickname was "the sheik" derived from his appearance.....semitic as it turns out...wrong branch though.
ReplyDeleteA careful perusal of Mosley's background reveals he was almost certainly a crypto Jew.
So even the leader of the BUF was Jewish.
One should not be surprised about this....Jews like to act as their own opposition.Controlling both sides in other words.
They are still doing this today,as there is very good evidence that a number of Muslim leaders in the Mid East are actually crypto Jews.
It is a very effective strategy.
In Holland for example their secret police actually set up and ran the communist party right from its inception.
Then we have the absurd example of the BDL...."curiously" the Israeli flag showed up at some of their demo's when they were defending Britain..led by Jews.
The only way around this strategy is separating any opposition to Jewish domination via small cells independent of each other.
Of course for these Jewish imposters to be successful it helps that these political groups are never subject to close scrutiny by the media,that is proper,in depth investigative journalism.
You can add Northcliff to the large number of high profile people who have been murdered by the Jews. The Jewish run media reported that Dr David Kelly committed suicide...yeah right.
Headline in today's Independent:
ReplyDelete'David Cameron piles pressure on Tom Watson over Leon Brittan comments'
Improbable as it might seem, is there a possibility that Tom Watson MP could be an asset of the security services?
The 'script' playing out in the media has Leon Brittan canonised, while Tom Watson MP is crucified for being 'attention seeking'.
The predictable effect of this pre-scripted 'performance' is that child sexual abuse survivors are deterred from coming forward, fearing the same *apparent* humiliation that Tom Watson is receiving.
At the same time, paedophiles are receiving a new shield of protection, thanks to a change in public opinion (engineered by the media and their masters) *against* the victims.
The victims and whistle-blowers are being falsely portrayed in the media as fantasists (or worse).
And the usual Establishment stooges are stirring the pot (eg contemptible lickspittles like Keith 'giz an honour' Vaz MP).
Since all the other actors in this play are transparently carrying out their parts in a script, perhaps we should question whether Tom Watson MP is bought & paid for, too?
And, for that matter, Simon Danczuk MP.
And, for that matter, Exaro News.
I'm not saying that any of these persons & entities are necessarily corrupt. They may not be.
But I think we have to at least entertain as a possibility that the seeming 'champions' of sex abuse victims & survivors may be nothing of the kind.
One only has to look at how successfully the Elite are creating public opinion around child sexual abuse to realise that clearly there are 'assets' of the security services operating in every important institution.
I wonder which MPs are the wolves in sheep's clothing...
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/tom-watson-has-questions-to-answer-david-cameron-piles-the-pressure-on-deputy-labour-leader-over-a6690836.html
If the Establishment and that creep Cameron feel so highly organised child abuse by gov't officials is a hoax, why don't they lift the D-notices on Operation Ore and Dunblane, and all the rest? Watson should ask that question of Cameron, and someone should film Cameron's face to record his reaction......
DeleteThe victims need to press for the truth to be known, they should voluntarily submit to chemical interrogation, lie detectors, brain wave scans, etc to verify their testimony- not because their testimony is questionable, but because once they have done this, they have the moral authority to demand that the deniers, obfuscators, counter-accusers, and "experts" do the same- Who would be opposed to knowing the truth about abuse, so that the issue could be resolved, one way or the other? Yeah, that's who........
Deletefrom Dave Mcgowan-
Delete"And so it is that we first confront that most disturbing of topics—snuff films, which most people assume do not actually exist. As recently as February 1999, the New York Post assured readers that: “Snuff films are the stuff of urban legend…how did this legend get started? No one knows.” The unfortunate truth though is that snuff films do actually exist, and they likely have existed for as long as film has existed, though they were not always known by that name. According to the Post: “The term ‘snuff ’ was actually coined during the Charles Manson case, when press reports repeated a rumor that the Manson ‘family’ had filmed home movies of the brutal slayings.” Other reports hold that the term was coined in 1976 by a writer for the New York Times who was in need of a phrase to describe reports of murders following sexual activity being captured on film.
In the late 1970s, as Carl Raschke noted in Painted Black, the “Texas House Select Committee on Child Pornography disclosed…that investigators probing leads to organized crime in Houston, Dallas, and other major cities found that ‘slave’ auctions for sixteen- and seventeen-year-old boys were routinely held in Mexico. Some of the boys were featured in brutal snuff or ‘slasher’ movies.” Raschke also quotes from a study by U.S. mental health professionals that claims that a child from Mexico “can be packaged, delivered, and sold deep within [the United States] in a short time,” and that many are purchased solely “for the purpose of killing.”
In Enslaved, Gordon Thomas reported that: “At the start of the year [1991] Britain’s Scotland Yard was continuing to investigate reports that up to twenty children in London had been murdered last year in [snuff films] and the video tapes sold on the Continent.” Journalist Nick Davies, writing for the Guardian in November 2000, revisited that investigation, which was centered on a group of British pedophiles living in Amsterdam. The investigation revealed that the men were running gay brothels that were essentially ‘fronts’ for trafficking underage boys, many purchased from the streets of economically ravaged Eastern Europe, and others collected from the streets of London. Prominent among the group of pedophiles were a man named Alan Williams, known as the “Welsh Witch,” and another named Warwick Spinks, who according to Davies, “pioneered the trafficking of boys as young as 10.”
DeleteImage result for images of Warwick Spinks
Spinks
The men used the boys in the production of child pornography and, according to several witnesses, in the production of snuff films. Davies wrote: “not just once but repeatedly, evidence had come to the attention of police in England and the Netherlands, that, for pleasure and profit, some of the exiled paedophiles in Amsterdam had murdered boys in front of the camera.” Indeed, witnesses had independently given descriptions of snuff films that were remarkably consistent in the details of the types of torture used and the manner of death, though the descriptions of the victim and the filming location differed, indicating that a number of such films had been made. One witness claimed to have seen five such films.
In the fall of 1998, British detectives flew to Amsterdam to investigate a particularly detailed account provided by a witness. The investigators had in their possession: a detailed description of the apartment where the witness had viewed the tape; the name of the owner of the apartment and videotape; the name of the man who committed the murder; a detailed description of events on the tape; and the first name and approximate age of the victim. With all that in hand, says Davies, the detectives “hit a wall.” Dutch police “said it was not enough” to warrant launching any sort of an investigation. By that time, investigators had been hearing accounts of the snuff films for nearly eight years. At one point, they had recruited an undercover officer “to pose as a child abuser and befriend Warwick Spinks,” who acknowledged to the officer that he was actively involved in trafficking boys. He also revealed that he knew “some people who were involved in making snuff movies and how they did it was, they only sold them in limited editions, made 10 copies or something, 10 very rich customers in America, who paid $5,000 each or something like that.” There is no indication that any thorough investigation was ever conducted, or that any arrests were ever made.
In September 2002, the Chicago Sun Times carried a brief report of two brothers who were arrested and charged with possessing an enormous collection of child pornography. Seized from the brothers were 5,000 photographic images, along with about 100 videotapes and 8mm films. Among this evidence were images of “young girls apparently tortured, raped and killed.” The American media has shown no inclination to shine any additional light on the case.
DeleteAn account of the recent Italian case carried by the Guardian affirmed the existence of snuff films: “Police have discovered a massive international pedophile network selling violent child-pornography videos to clients in Italy, the US and Germany…(authorities are) trying to identify 5,000 people who are suspected of attempting to purchase the videos, some of which appear to contain images of children being tortured and murdered.” The UK’s Independent, in a follow-up published in November 2000, also confirmed that the seized materials included child snuff films: “Horrified investigators gathered images of more than 2,000 children who were filmed while being abused, raped, and…killed.” By that time, close to 1,500 people had been charged in the case, but not—as the Guardian noted—“those in high places who are believed to form a ‘paedophile lobby.’”
As in the Belgian, Latvian, and Portuguese cases, there were indications in the Italian case of high-level complicity and a strong belief among the people that the facts of the case were being covered up. And as with the other cases, the Independent reported that the magistrate heading up the inquiry “provoked a furor by denouncing a ‘pedophile lobby’ supported by politicians which he said openly obstructed the investigators and worked to prevent tougher sanctions for the consumers of child pornography.” The New York Times reported in March 1997 that there is “growing public indignation in France and elsewhere about the recurrent reports of kidnapping, rape or incest involving the very young.” The same Times report revealed that French police had “detained more than 250 people and confiscated some 5,000 videocassettes” in conjunction with an investigation into a massive child pornography ring. Those detained by police were described as “mainly married professionals.” A dozen of them soon turned up dead, allegedly by their own hand.
The BBC filed a brief report on a 1996 case that was otherwise almost completely ignored by the English-language press: “Mexican police broke up an international child pornography ring based in the resort of Acapulco which they said had at least four thousand clients in the United States,” (emphasis added). A UN envoy investigating the case said that the “child pornography sometimes involved babies of less than one month old.”
DeleteIn June 1997, the News Telegraph spoke of over 800 French homes being raided and 204 suspects being taken into custody. Among those detained were “more than 30 teachers…and a number of priests,” as well as the deputy mayor of the town of Saint Mihiel. By the end of the week, four had committed suicide, including a school headmaster. Three years later, the BBC filed a very brief report noting that a verdict was due “in the trial of more than sixty people accused of possessing child pornography. One of the judges hearing the case said examining the video evidence made him feel physically sick.” In a familiar refrain, it was reported that: “the French courts have been accused of attacking the easy targets—porn consumers—rather than producers and distributors. And one children’s rights group has alleged that senior public figures were among those investigated—but their cases were dropped before coming to court.”
In 1998, another large-scale international ring was discovered operating out of the Netherlands and Berlin, Germany. The New York Times reported that investigators called the case “nauseating,” in that “images of abuse of even babies and infants were peddled via the Internet and other media.” Police discovered “voluminous records of what appear to be clients and suppliers from countries including Israel, Ukraine, Britain, Russia and the United States.” The ring was first uncovered when a key member was found dead in Italy. According to the Irish Times, he was murdered by another member of the ring. His apartment in the Dutch town of Zandvoort was found to contain “thousands of digital images stored on computer disks,” as well as “hundreds of addresses of suspected suppliers and clients,” according to the New York Times. The images shocked even veteran sex-crimes investigators, one of whom stated that the seized evidence “left [him] speechless…It looks like the perpetrators are not dealing with human beings but with objects.”
http://netteandme.blogspot.com/search/label/Book-Programmed%20To%20Kill%20Politics%20of%20Serial%20Murder?updated-max=2015-02-28T21:04:00-08:00&max-results=20&start=13&by-date=false
A paedophile ring operated in and around Westminster in the late 1970’s and early 1980’s. It infiltrated the Home Office, the Police and the legal system. The Paedophile Information Exchange had powerful members and powerful support. Children were trafficked from care homes in London and beyond through a network of abusers who took control of elements of the care home system.
ReplyDeleteA 'Westminster/VIP paedophile network' continued to be active through at least the earlier part of the 1990s, too, according to Scallywag magazine.
DeleteOf course New Labour were in office from 1997, coinciding with societal changes such as the expansion of cctv, proliferation of the Internet, and a further erosion of deference & respect for politicians etc. Thus, my guess would be that the nature of organised child rape probably began to change with Blair's election or slightly earlier.
1997 brought a 'new' set of ministers, influential MPs, and VIPs for the domestic & foreign security agencies to film raping children -- as well as some new technology options to assist with the entrapment & monitoring of VIP targets (credit card tracking, internet use tracking, monitoring of mobile phone communications etc).
It seems probable to me that VIP paedophile operations would have gone deeper 'underground' as a result of the changes I mentioned. Other recent developments such as potential 'citizen journalists' in every city & town armed with digital cameras, and increased numbers of paparazzis etc, has no doubt created a general environment 'less hospitable' to serial paedo-sadists.
Tragically, with the paedophile networks now operating deeper underground, perhaps it becomes even more difficult to find & expose them... Although of course the 'good guys' have the use of new technologies, too, which helps a little (websites such as this).
Very deep info, with names of Spartacus publishers and more as RAWRO Ltd.
ReplyDeleteCapital Gay Mag plus names and alot of proof about Elm Guest House:
http://bishopbrightly.com/category/elm-guest-house-2/
http://archive.spectator.co.uk/article/16th-october-1920/19/the-causes-of-world-unrest
ReplyDeletereblogged
ReplyDeletespecial families
ReplyDeletehttp://www.globalresearch.ca/the-funding-of-the-2016-us-presidential-election-americas-158-billionaire-families/5481446
http://www.globalresearch.ca/what-eisenhower-really-said-about-the-military-industrial-complex-the-complicit-role-of-the-us-congress/5481538
ReplyDeletehttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3269365/Body-former-Grange-Hill-star-Terry-Sue-Patt-badly-decomposed-police-forced-way-house-identified-newspaper-cuttings-career-wall.html
ReplyDeleteThe Female Paedophile
ReplyDeletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QzC6OfPj82I
Author Michele Elliott of 'Kidscape', in an interview recorded in 2004, provides an insight into women who sexually abuse children and covers how some Gender Feminists (among others) have attempted to suppress the reality of the high prevalence of female abusers
Login to your gmail account (if available)
ReplyDeleteThen go to:
https://maps.google.com/locationhistory/b/0/
If you have a gmail account and don't disable location tracking, then google has a map of your location for every second of your life.
Pausing Location History does not turn off Location Reporting, so what you see on the link provided is just a part of the google monitoring on you.
From report at EU Commission speaking of Wellington House as the start of current US media deception & fraud against Europe by CIA-run Google & Wikipedia:
ReplyDelete"From an Anglo-American point of view, it is corrupting, controlling and intimidating the media, which enable all horrible and disgusting crimes to be committed ... The Anglo obsession with controlling media, dates back to 1914, when Great Britain established the 'WPB - War Propaganda Bureau' at Wellington House in London, which began to publish the outrageous propaganda lies and hoaxes against Germany during the 1914-1918 war in Europe. The people working at Wellington House were so disgusted with themselves for their lying, they burned the files of Wellington House as the war ended - although we still have the many ugly and deceptive propaganda tracts they did publish ...
Americans are certain it was the lying propaganda of Wellington House, which enabled Britain and its allies to avoid losing that war. The lying propaganda was key to manipulating the US public into entering war against Germany, which in turn enabled the UK and allies to conclude the war favourably for themselves. The bold lying techniques of Wellington House were greatly studied and expanded by Sigmund Freud's nephew living in America, Edward Louis Bernays, expert master of 'Propaganda' ... and then Wellington House and Bernays' techniques, were further developed by Hitler's associate Joseph Goebbels.
After 1945, the 'total information war' lying techniques of Wellington House - Bernays - Goebbels, were adopted by America's CIA as 'Operation Mockingbird', with control via ownership and intimidation of major US media companies. And today, it is the CIA-seeded-and-controlled Google and Wikipedia, which are America's leading global deception tools, still making use of the techniques from 100 years earlier at Wellington House, mixing truth in order to sell even bigger lies, lies that kill human beings and financially destroy their victims. As [Americans] joke and laugh while conducting fraud and terrorist acts against European citizens, "We're f-cking America and we control the whole world internet!" ... "Who controls Google and the internet, motherf-cker?"
Google and Wikipedia are both CIA companies engaged in lying and fraud against Europe ... Google was developed with CIA funding ... Wikipedia operates as an arm of the CIA directly inserting lies from CIA computers ... The EU Member State police report dossier on Wikipedia's fundraising fraud [speaks about] search results manipulated by CIA-Google, so that CIA-Wikipedia lies are dominant ... Google Inc is consciously and explicitly deploying 5 levels of internet content control against EU citizens and companies."
Don't forget that Wellington House is now the Tavistock Institute and has been since 1921:
Deletehttp://mindcontrolfordummies.50megs.com/whats_new_20.html
I'm been going through some old Aangjrfan posts from here when I came across this:
ReplyDelete"It can be argued that at the top of the pyramid of power, the Nazis, Communists, and Mafias all work together on behalf of the Robber Barons and Feudal Lords.
The Robber Barons and Feudal Lords were happy to support Hitler one moment, and Stalin the next moment."
I'm still mystified about why communism was so bad. Apparently, the first Russian socialists were social democrats, but they were soon replaced by the Bolsheviks communists, a very viscous bunch of people.
I'm a leftist leaning pacifist, anti ruling class, easy going liberal, anti racist, anti first fascist, etc, and yet some people in the past, who were much further left than me, were viscous murdering psychopathic bastards. I wonder, were they really left at all, but were instead agents of the ruling class whose function was to discredit the left. Communism was the best thing to ever happen to the ruling class. It kind of worked too well for them.
WW2 was madness with 60 million dead, but after watching JFK to 9/11 something clicked in me: WW2 was extremely profitable for ruling class.
In the war effort British workers were often made to work extra long hours for nothing - because everyone was expected to do their but - except the ruling class, who owned the factories, always charged top whack for all the weapons they made.
I'm disgusted at the BBC for their apologia for perverts. The word was obviously get Tom Watson as well; a warning to others.
ReplyDeleteHas the art of rhetoric died out in the UK? Why doesn't someone point out that -
The Network of Perverts is Once Again Defending Perverts!
The name of Savile should be repeated over and over and tied where it belongs, to the BBC.
BBC - Home of a Thousand Rapes!
How dare they!
In the Guardian the other day was an article by a liberal journalist defending Sir Leon Brittan. She said that he was an innocent man whose family was now very stressed with all these people making such terrible allegations. We don't want to get out wrong, that would be a terrible injustice, but we don't want to not investigate it either. We have watched the documentaries and have seen how high class paedophiles get away with it all the time. Even Ken Livingstone knew what was going on.
DeleteThanks. The very best to you and all the others in the UK seeking dignity and justice for the people and accountability for the degenerate elite.
Delete