Showing posts with label BBC. Show all posts
Showing posts with label BBC. Show all posts
Thursday, 3 May 2018
Tuesday, 3 April 2018
Tuesday, 2 January 2018
BREAKUP OF IRAN
What is happening in Iran?
"The Bernard Lewis Project was first presented in 1979.
"The core proposal of this project is to divide countries in the Middle East along ethnic and regional lines into smaller, rival states in order to weaken the power of existing governments."
Narratives of Suffering: Bernard Lewis
Bernard Lewis: one of the secret rulers of the world / THE COLLAPSE OF THE MOSLEM WORLD
Operation Ajax
In 1953, the CIA toppled Iran's popular and moderate Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh, and put the Shah into power.
In 1979, the CIA toppled the Shah and put Ayatollah Khomeini into power.
Currently, in 2018, the CIA is trying to topple Iran's Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and president Hassan Rouhani.
The aim of the CIA and its friends is to do to Iran what has been done to Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Egypt, Tunisia ....
The mainstream media would like us to believe that the Shah was overthrown by People Power and that the CIA and MI6 were taken by surprise.
However, there is clear evidence that the CIA and MI6 toppled the Shah because he had become too much of a nationalist, like Nasser, and was not following instructions on oil or even opium.
The CIA did not want moderately left-wing democrats taking over from the Shah as they might not be easy to control.
So, reportedly, the CIA put the Ayatollahs into power.
Reportedly, Khomeini's real father, was William Richard Williamson, born in Bristol, England, in 1872 of British parents and lineage. KHOMEINI
Radio Free Iran claimed that while at Qom, the Ayatollah Khomeini received a "monthly stipend from the British, and he is in constant contact with his masters, the British."
The British, Muslim Terrorism and September 11
On 19 January 1980, the International Herald Tribune reported that the Shah had said, two years before he was overthrown, that he had heard from two different sources connected with oil companies that the regime in Iran would change.
'We believe that there was a plan to ensure less oil was offered to the world markets in order to bring about a price,' said the Shah. 'One country was to be chosen for the sacrifice... It seems that the country chosen to drop its oil production was mine.'
webgardian: Shah:Oil Companies Helped to Oust Him
Carter and the Shah. In 1979, the aim of the Carter regime was to put the extreme Islamists into power in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iran. The Kosher Nostra likes to weaken such states.
The Shah's nationalist policies were making him more popular in Iran and making his country more independent and more powerful.
redmoonrising.com
This worried the CIA, Mossad and MI6.
1. The Shah bought land from the upper classes and, along with the crown's own land, sold it back cheaply to tenant farmers.
Over one a half million people became land owners, thus ending the old feudal system.
2.The Shah allowed women the right to vote. He brought an end to the wearing of the veil.
3. He developed plans for a $90 billion nuclear power program.
4. The Shah signed petroleum agreements with ENI, the Italian oil company.
5. He began to close down the opium industry. This had been created during the days of British influence.
Iran under the Shah.
'Former intelligence officer' Dr John Coleman considers opium to be of prime importance in the toppling of the Shah
(Conspirators’ Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of 300 - 6).
Coleman writes that the US government toppled the Shah of Iran because of DRUGS.
The Shah had clamped down and virtually put an end to the immensely lucrative opium trade being conducted out of Iran by the British...
This the British would not tolerate, so they sent the United States to do their dirty work for them in terms of the 'special relationship' between the two countries.
Iran's drug problem: Addicts 'more than double' in six years.
Coleman writes:
After 1984, Khomeini's liberal attitude toward opium had increased the number of addicts to 2 million, according to United Nations and World Health Organization statistics.
With the advent of Khomeini... opium production skyrocketed.
By 1984 Iran’s opium production exceeded 650 metric tons of opium per annum.... Iran presently rivals the Golden Triangle in the volume of opium produced.
The Iran-Iraq War 1980-88. The CIA put Saddam into power, and, put the Ayatollah into power. One of the aims was to get a war started between Iran and Iraq, and then supply both sides with weapons. SADDAM AND THE CIA.
Coleman writes:
When Khomeini took over the U.S. Embassy in Teheran, arms sales by the United States, which had begun with the Shah, were not discontinued...
Both President Carter and his successor, Ronald Reagan, willingly and with full knowledge of what was at stake, went on supplying arms to Iran even while American hostages languished in captivity...
The arms trade with Iran was sealed at a meeting between Cyrus Vance... and Dr. Hashemi, which resulted in the U.S. Air Force beginning an immediate airlift of arms to Iran, carried on even at the height of the hostage crisis the arms came from U.S. Army stockpiles in Germany and some were even flown directly from the United States with refueling stops at the Azores.
The following is taken from redmoonrising.com/Ikhwan
(Sources used in the article: The Biography of Dr. Mohammad Mossadegh, jebhemelli.org
Killing Hope - U.S. Military and CIA Interventions Since World War II, William Blum, 1995
MI6 - Inside the Covert World of Her Majesty's Secret Intelligence Service, Stephen Dorril, 2000)
The CIA and MI6 used the Muslim Brotherhood to put the Ayatollahs into power.
Prior to World War II, British Intelligence controlled the Muslim Brotherhood - a Muslim equivalent of the West's Masonic brotherhood...
According to CIA agent Miles Copeland ... the CIA began to cooperate with the Muslim Brotherhood...
British Intelligence used their contacts with Iran's mullahs and ayatollahs to overthrow the Shah.
Prior to the British-sponsored massive public relations campaign on behalf of the Ayatollah the government of the Shah was loved by the vast majority of the population.
Dr. John Coleman, a former British Intelligence agent... states that the Muslim Brotherhood was created by "the great names of British Middle East intelligence" ...
And that their mission was to "keep the Middle East backward so that its natural resource, oil, could continue to be looted..."
Dr. Coleman writes that in 1980 the broadcasts of Radio Free Iran divided the enemies of the Shah into four categories:
1. Iranian politicians bought by the Israeli Shin Bet,
2. The CIA's network of agents,
3. The feudal landowners,
4. The Freemasons and the Muslim Brotherhood.
redmoonrising.com
On February 1st, 1979, two weeks after the Shah's departure, Khomeini made a triumphant return to Iran.
The BBC's John Simpson was on the plane that carried him back from Paris.
BBC links to MI6?
On 3 November 2011, Saman Mohammadi, at The Excavator, points out that:
The British and U.S. governments put Khomeini into power in Iran in 1979
1. The Shah said: "If you lift up Khomeini's beard, you will find Made In England written under his chin."
The Shah told David Frost:
"Do you think that Mr. Khomeini, an uneducated person ... could have planned all this, masterminded all this, set up all the organizations...
"I know that a tremendous amount of money was spent...
"I know that top experts in propaganda were used to show us like tyrants and monsters, and the other side as democratic, liberal revolutionaries who wanted to save the country.
"I know how mean the BBC, British Broadcasting Corporation, had been towards us... So it seemed that it was really a very well orchestrated conspiracy."
Boys from Isfahan by Detengase
2. The BBC promoted Khomeini, according to Dr. Ronen Bergman, an Israeli investigative journalist and author of the 2008 book, 'The Secret War with Iran'.
A "propaganda tool for Khomeini was none other than the Persian-language broadcasts of the British Broadcasting Corporation," wrote Bergman.
"The BBC gave free hours of free broadcast to Khomeini from Paris," said Bergman.
Bernard Lewis and Henry Kissinger. "Lewis's scheme - to promote balkanization of the entire Muslim Near East along tribal and religious lines."
3. Historian F. William Engdahl, in his 2004 book A Century Of War : Anglo-American Oil Politics and the New World Order, wrote:
"In November 1978, President Carter named the Bilderberg group's George Ball, another member of the Trilateral Commission, to head a special White House Iran task force under the National Security Council's Brzezinski.
"Ball recommended that Washington drop support for the Shah of Iran and support the fundamentalistic Islamic opposition of Ayatollah Khomeini."
Iranian kids by Hamed Saber
"Robert Bowie from the CIA was one of the lead 'case officers' in the new CIA-led coup against the man their covert actions had placed into power 25 years earlier.
"Their scheme was based on a detailed study of the phenomenon of Islamic fundamentalism, as presented by British Islamic expert, Dr. Bernard Lewis, then on assignment at Princeton University in the United States.
"Lewis's scheme, which was unveiled at the May 1979 Bilderberg meeting in Austria, endorsed the radical Muslim Brotherhood movement behind Khomeini, in order to promote balkanization of the entire Muslim Near East along tribal and religious lines.
"Lewis argued that the West should encourage autonomous groups such as the Kurds, Armenians, Lebanese Maronites, Ethiopian Copts, Azerbaijani Turks, and so forth.
"The chaos would spread in what he termed an 'Arc of Crisis,' which would spill over into Muslim regions of the Soviet Union."
Iran by Jeremy Curl Photography
"The coup against the Shah was run by British and American intelligence...
"During 1978, negotiations were under way between the Shah's government and British Petroleum for renewal of the 25-year old extraction agreement.
"By October 1978, the talks had collapsed over a British 'offer' which demanded exclusive rights to Iran's future oil output, while refusing to guarantee purchase of the oil.
"With their dependence on British-controlled export apparently at an end, Iran appeared on the verge of independence in its oil sales policy for the first time since 1953, with eager prospective buyers in Germany, France, Japan and elsewhere."
Children in Iran by Ivan Mlinaric.
4. In his 1981 book, Hostage to Khomeini, journalist Robert Dreyfuss wrote:
"The mullahs did not come to rule in Iran on the basis of their own power; they were placed in power by men more evil than they - who would use the depravity of backwardness for their own ends.
"In September 1975, the Aspen Institute held a symposium in Persepolis, Iran...
"In the behind-the-scenes discussion, the plans for reversing the Shah's industrialization program and for turning Iran into a model dark ages regime were mapped out..."
Two girls and a bicycle by Damon Lynch
5. Fritz Springmeier wrote in an article called, To Love Or Hate - Know Your Enemy:
"The Ayatollah Khomeini was British MI6.
"And tying together Saudi intelligence, Saddam Hussein's intelligence and Egyptian intelligence (and previously the Shah’s CIA-led SAVAK) is a group called the Safari Club set up by French espionage."
Old man and the boys, Iran, by Kamshots
Boys Army by Sharto4.
Iranian kids by Shapour
3. Historian F. William Engdahl, in his 2004 book A Century Of War : Anglo-American Oil Politics and the New World Order, wrote:
"In November 1978, President Carter named the Bilderberg group's George Ball, another member of the Trilateral Commission, to head a special White House Iran task force under the National Security Council's Brzezinski.
"Ball recommended that Washington drop support for the Shah of Iran and support the fundamentalistic Islamic opposition of Ayatollah Khomeini."
Iranian kids by Hamed Saber
"Robert Bowie from the CIA was one of the lead 'case officers' in the new CIA-led coup against the man their covert actions had placed into power 25 years earlier.
"Their scheme was based on a detailed study of the phenomenon of Islamic fundamentalism, as presented by British Islamic expert, Dr. Bernard Lewis, then on assignment at Princeton University in the United States.
"Lewis's scheme, which was unveiled at the May 1979 Bilderberg meeting in Austria, endorsed the radical Muslim Brotherhood movement behind Khomeini, in order to promote balkanization of the entire Muslim Near East along tribal and religious lines.
"Lewis argued that the West should encourage autonomous groups such as the Kurds, Armenians, Lebanese Maronites, Ethiopian Copts, Azerbaijani Turks, and so forth.
"The chaos would spread in what he termed an 'Arc of Crisis,' which would spill over into Muslim regions of the Soviet Union."
Iran by Jeremy Curl Photography
"The coup against the Shah was run by British and American intelligence...
"During 1978, negotiations were under way between the Shah's government and British Petroleum for renewal of the 25-year old extraction agreement.
"By October 1978, the talks had collapsed over a British 'offer' which demanded exclusive rights to Iran's future oil output, while refusing to guarantee purchase of the oil.
"With their dependence on British-controlled export apparently at an end, Iran appeared on the verge of independence in its oil sales policy for the first time since 1953, with eager prospective buyers in Germany, France, Japan and elsewhere."
Children in Iran by Ivan Mlinaric.
4. In his 1981 book, Hostage to Khomeini, journalist Robert Dreyfuss wrote:
"The mullahs did not come to rule in Iran on the basis of their own power; they were placed in power by men more evil than they - who would use the depravity of backwardness for their own ends.
"In September 1975, the Aspen Institute held a symposium in Persepolis, Iran...
"In the behind-the-scenes discussion, the plans for reversing the Shah's industrialization program and for turning Iran into a model dark ages regime were mapped out..."
Two girls and a bicycle by Damon Lynch
5. Fritz Springmeier wrote in an article called, To Love Or Hate - Know Your Enemy:
"The Ayatollah Khomeini was British MI6.
"And tying together Saudi intelligence, Saddam Hussein's intelligence and Egyptian intelligence (and previously the Shah’s CIA-led SAVAK) is a group called the Safari Club set up by French espionage."
Old man and the boys, Iran, by Kamshots
Boys Army by Sharto4.
Iranian kids by Shapour
Saturday, 9 September 2017
9 11 INSIDE JOB - DAILY MAIL
Geoff Campbell
Geoff Campbell was one of the 67 Britons killed in the 9/11 attacks.
His brother Matt, a trained theoretical physicist, says that the US government carried out the 9 11 attacks.
On 11 September 2017, Matt Campbell, and others, will hold a protest outside BBC Broadcasting House in London.
Matt Campbell says that a series of 9/11 documentaries put out by the BBC have not been impartial or scientifically accurate.
Mat says: "In at least one documentary, the BBC removed the sounds of huge explosions going off in WTC7 moments before its collapse."
Matt Campbell says that a series of 9/11 documentaries put out by the BBC have not been impartial or scientifically accurate.
Mat says: "In at least one documentary, the BBC removed the sounds of huge explosions going off in WTC7 moments before its collapse."
In 2016, a survey in the US magazine Live Science revealed that most Americans (53%) believe the U.S. Government is hiding information about the 9/11 attacks.
The third tower at the World Trade Centre was not hit by a plane, and yet it collapsed in seven seconds.
In September 2017, a team of engineers at the University of Alaska concluded, after two years of forensic research, that fire could not have caused the collapse of the third tower, World Trade Centre building 7.
Matt notes that none of the 'hijacked' planes was intercepted by fighter jets.
Matt notes that in the days immediately prior to 9 11 there was an extremely high volume of bets on the price of certain shares falling - shares that included those of American and United Airlines.
The Twin Towers could not have been brought down by hot aircraft fuel.
Steel does not begin to melt until it reaches around 2,800f.
Jet fuel cannot burn hotter than 1,700f.
Official reports state the steel in the third tower reached a maximum of 1,100f.
dailymail
The Mohammed Atta who was trained by the US military was working for Mossad.
The CIA and its friends must have used explosives to bring down the towers.
Official reports state the steel in the third tower reached a maximum of 1,100f.
dailymail
The Mohammed Atta who was trained by the US military was working for Mossad.
The CIA and its friends must have used explosives to bring down the towers.
Firefighters, on 9 11, did hear explosions.
For example, firefighter Richard Banaciski said: "There was just an explosion. It seemed like on television when they blow up these buildings. It seemed like it was going all the way round like a belt . . . all those explosions."
Firefighter Kenneth Rogers said: "There was an explosion in the South Tower. Floor after floor after floor. One floor under another after another . . . I figured it was a bomb because it looked like a synchronised kind of thing.
Fire Captain Dennis Tardio said: "I hear an explosion and I look up. It is as if the building is being imploded from the top floor down, boom, boom, boom. I stand in amazement. I can't believe what I am seeing. The building is coming down."
In the case of the third tower, WTC7, bystanders, interviewed by US television, said there were "bang, bang, bang" sounds before it fell down.
dailymail
Above, we see the BBC's Jane Standley, who is standing in front of the clearly visible WTC7 tower.
Jane Standley says of WTC7: "The 47-storey building, situated very close to the World Trade Centre, has also just collapsed. It seems that this was not the result of a new attack. It was because the building had been weakened during the morning attacks."
In many parts of the world, the key people in key institutions work for the CIA and its friends.
Several journalists working for the CIA and its friends reported that WTC7 had collapsed 23 minutes before it had actually fallen down.
Osama bin Laden, of the Crypto-Jewish bin Laden family. According to the newspaper Scotland on Sunday, Osma bin Laden worked for the Jewish mafia.
9 11 has been REVEALED by The Daily Mail.
Tony Rennell, in the UK's Daily Mail, 6th August 2005, wrote:
"Towers that fell 'like a controlled demolition'. Planes that vanished then mysteriously reappeared. And crucial evidence that has been lost for ever. A new book raises bizarre yet deeply unsettling questions about the world’s worst terror atrocity….."
The book being reviewed by Rennell:
9/11 Revealed: Challenging The Facts Behind The War On Terror, by Ian Henshall and Rowland Morgan, published by Robinson at £8.99.
The review:
The plot by America’s military bosses was devilish in both design and intent – to fabricate an outrage against innocent civilians, fool the world and provide a pretext for war.
In the pentagon, a top secret team drew up a plan to simultaneously send up two airliners painted and numbered exactly the same, one from a civil airport in America, the other from a secret military airbase nearby.
The one from the airport would have military personnel on board who had checked in as ordinary passengers under false names. The one from the airbase would be an empty drone, a remote-controlled unmanned aircraft.
Somewhere along their joint flight paths, the passenger-carrying plane would drop below radar height, and disappear, landing back at the airbase and unloading its occupants in secret.
Meanwhile, the drone would have taken up the other plane’s designated course. High over the island of Cuba, it would be exploded in mid-air after broadcasting an international distress call that it was under attack from enemy fighters.
The world would be told that a plane load of blameless American holidaymakers had been deliberately shot down by Fidel Castro’s Communists – and that the US had no choice but to declare war and topple his regime.
This ‘agent provocateur’ plan – code named OPERATION NORTHWOODS and revealed in official archives – dates from 1962 when the Cold War was at its height.
Four decades later, there are a growing number of people who look back at this proto-conspiracy and then to the events of 9/11 and see uncanny and frightening modern parallels.
For Cuba, read Iraq, say these skeptics. For the dummy airliner, read the Twin Towers in New York.
The Northwoods plan is crucial to the argument presented in a hugely provocative – many would say fantastical – yet, at times, genuinely disturbing new analysis of 9/11 by two radical British based journalists, Ian Henshall and Rowland Morgan.
In it, they examine various conspiracy theories that suggest the Bush administration connived in the devastating aerial attacks on New York and Washington four years ago. The reason? To give Bush the excuse he wanted to push ahead with his secret, long-held plane to invade Iraq and capture its oilfields...
Much of evidence the authors present is undeniably compelling – and their arguments sound rather less preposterous in the light of OPERATION NORTHWOODS all those years ago.
That plan was proposed in all seriousness by America’s Joint Chiefs of Staff in a memo to the Secretary of Defence. It got as far as the Attorney General – Robert Kennedy, brother of the president, John Kennedy, before being vetoed.
It is proof, says Henshall and Morgan, that forces at the top of the US Government are capable of conceiving a deadly, devious and fraudulent plan to further their own secret ends – even under such a supposedly ‘nice guy’ president as JFK.
In which case, can the idea of a 9/11 plot by those who serve the deeply mistrusted Bush really be ruled out with total certainty, without at least considering the arguments?
Of course, the official explanation for 9/11 is that Al Qaeda just got lucky that sunny morning in September 2001.
The terrorists conducted their attacks without outside help, by this account, and intelligence and other blunders by the US authorities that contributed to their terrible success – for example, ignored warnings that an attack involving aeroplanes was likely, or issuing US entry visas to 19 Islamic fanatics set on murder – were just that: blunders.
This is the White House’s version and it was endorsed by a Washington commission of inquiry under Thomas Kean published last year.
But, according to Henshall and Morgan, the story is full of gaping holes and unanswered questions.
And the most startling question, which remains unresolved, they say, is why the hijackers’ principal target, the two 110-storey towers at the World Trade Centre in New York crumbled so easily.
No-one who watched each building suddenly cascade into dust and debris in just 20 seconds will ever forget the slow-motion horror.
But now the question is asked: was it all too pat, too neat?
Though 30 years old, the towers had expressly been built to survive the impact of a Boeing 707, a plane the same size and carrying as much fuel as the ones that struck.
That they collapsed after being hit and fell at such speed was unprecedented in the history of architecture.
It astonished many engineers.
The official explanation is known as the Pancake Effect – steel supports melting in the intense fireball, causing the floors to tumble down on each other.
The problem here is that the heat from the explosions was probably not nearly as great as people tend to assume.
There was indeed a lot of kerosene from the aircraft fuel tanks when flight 11 from Boston hit the North Tower between the 94th and the 98th floors but pictures show that most of this fireballed outwards.
Experts have questioned whether the fire ever got hot enough to melt the buildings’ steel frames.
Oddly, too, original estimates by firefighters after the second plane, Flight 175, hit the South Tower, were that the blaze was containable.
Two firefighters actually reached the crash zone on the 78th floor and a tape exists of them radioing down that just two hoses would be enough to get the fire under control – in which case the situation should have been little different from a ‘normal’ office fire, and no steel tower ever collapsed as the result of such a blaze.
‘The fire wasn’t hot enough to cause a collapse’ Kevin R Ryan, laboratory director at a US underwriting firm specializing in product safety, was sacked from his job last year after questioning the official explanation.
“The buildings should have easily withstood the thermal stress caused by the burning jet fuel”, he said. “If steel did soften or melt, this was certainly not due to jet fuel fires of any kind, let alone the briefly burning fires in those towers. That fact should be of great concern to all Americans.”
Intriguingly, Ryan claimed that his firm had checked and approved the steel used in the towers when they were built. This was later vehemently denied by the bosses who sacked him.
To add to the mystery, the tape of the two firemen was kept secret and when relatives were finally allowed to listen to it, they had to sign strict confidentiality agreements.
If the Pancake Effect theory is wrong, there’s one obvious alternative: that the towers were brought down by the sheer impact of the planes hitting them. But this, according to the skeptics, ignores basic physics. The initial hit on the North Tower, for example, destroyed 33 of the 59 columns in its north face. This meant the damage was asymmetrical, so any resulting collapse would surely have been lopsided. In fact, the building fell evenly.
The TV aerial on the summit sank vertically, in a straight line.
There were other strange anomalies. According to the Kean Commission, when the first plane struck: ‘A jet fuel fireball erupted and shot down a bank of elevators, bursting into numerous lower floors, including the lobby level, and the basement four storeys below ground.’ Unlikely, say Henshall and Morgan.
A film by a French documentary crew, who by chance were following a New York firefighting team that day, shows the first men arriving. The lobby was covered in fine debris and the windows were shattered but there was none of the soot or oily residue that burning jet fuel would have left behind.
Meanwhile down in the basement, a 50-ton hydraulic press was reduced to rubble and a steel and concrete fire door demolished. Witnesses there said the destruction was less like that from a fireball flash and more like that from a bomb.
And then there was the oddity of the single passport. The black boxes may have been destroyed and steel girders melted – yet somehow one of the hijackers’ passports avoided this inferno and was found intact in a nearby street by ‘a passer-by’.
To Henshall and Morgan, that seems absurd, as does the almost instant identification of this person as a hijacker rather than a passenger or a Twin Towers office worker.
Conspiracy theorists suspect the passport was planted to help establish the official story in the first, critical hours after the disaster.
Why didn't fighter planes intercept the hijackers?
Still more unanswered questions surround what happened at the Pentagon in Washington, in the third successful terrorist attack that day.
After taking off from Dulles Airport, Washington, American Airlines Flight 77 dropped off the radar screens for 36 minutes when its transponders sending signals back to air traffic control were switched off.
When the blip reappeared, it was closing on the city but where precisely the aircraft had been for the past half an hour was a mystery. Nor could anyone in air traffic control figure out what it was.
Experienced officials apparently watched its speed and maneuverability and thought it must be a military plane.
Conspiracy theorists maintain this is precisely what it was.
In a repeat of New York, no evidence has ever been produced from the wreckage to prove that it was Flight 77 that hurtled into the side of the Pentagon at 350mph.
Photographs show that the hole it made was large enough for the fuselage of a Boeing 757 but not for the wings and the tail, though these supposedly disappeared through the gap and then vapourised.
For the conspiracy theorists, this points to a conclusion that what hit was not Flight 77, and not even a jetliner. Some witnesses claim the plane they say hit the Pentagon was a small one, an eight – or 12-seater, and that it did not have the roar of an airliner but the shrill whine of a fighter plane. One witness is convinced it was a missile.
The authors say the matter could be cleared up by CCTV footage of the crash from a nearby filling station, a hotel and traffic surveillance cameras.
There were plenty of Nazis in the USA in the 1930s.
Unfortunately, the FBI seized all three videos within minutes of the crash and they have never been released.
If they were produced, they might lay to rest the theory that what hit the Pentagon was a military drone painted in airline livery and that just before impact it fired a missile to enable a clean entry which would explain the lack of debris. But until they are, the skeptics will continue to have a field day.
In essence, to the extreme conspiracy theorists, what took place on 9/11 was a repeat of the aborted OPERATION NORTHWOODS.
Far from being an attack by Islamic terrorists, they say, the events were a complete hoax, a conjuring trick by the US government in just the same way that Kennedy’s generals wanted to fool the world over Cuba.
Planes were swapped, ‘drones’ slammed into the World Trade Centre (which was mined with explosives as well) and the Pentagon, and the identities of alleged hijackers from the Middle East were stolen or invented to put the blame on Al Qaeda.
Along with the ‘passengers’ who apparently boarded the planes, the ‘suicide hijackers’ are now either dead or living under different identities, just as the pentagon planned fro the military personnel it was going to use back in 1962.
The theory seizes on the fact that, like the plane that apparently hit the Pentagon, both Flight 11 and Flight 175 switched off their transponders on their way to the Twin Towers and disappeared from Radar screens.
According to the skeptics, this gave them time and opportunity to land at the handily located Griffiss Air Force Base, a Pentagon command center which also houses research laboratories into advanced computers and radar.
There, they were supposedly replaced by remote-controlled substitutes.
In technical terms, this is not as far fetched as it sounds.
The US military experimented with unmanned aircraft as far back as World War II and there have been successful jet models since. Well-connected conspirators, so the theory goes, would have little difficulty getting their hands on a system to fit in an airliner. The switch would supposedly be foolproof because, as we have seen, the aircraft in the ruins would not be properly identified.
Then there was the smaller building known as WTC7. It was the obvious point from which to run the New York end of the scam, guiding the planes into their target. Afterwards, of course, the evidence had to be destroyed, hence its demolition...
Bologna 1980 reportedly showed that agents of the CIA and NATO were prepared to kill innocent civilians.
An operation of such intricacy and complexity would require the co-operation – and the silence until death – of thousands of people. Everything we have read about the victims on the planes, and their heartbroken relatives, would be a carefully constructed sham...
Why ... were air traffic controllers so slow to report suspected hijackings to the military that day in breach of standard procedures, with the result that fighter planes arrived too late to intercept?
Flight controllers in four separate incidents were unaccountably slow to realize that something was wrong and alert the military authorities.
Even after one plane was definitely known to have been hijacked, they failed to respond promptly when others went missing. The air force scrambled from the wrong base. For some reason, too, when fighter planes eventually were scrambled to New York, they were from an airbase 150 miles away, rather than the much closer one in New Jersey. The Twin Towers were ablaze before they got there.
All the while the local TV channels were smoothly getting eye-in-the-sky helicopters into the air over the World Trade Centre.
In the words of the authors: “Their routine mobilizations stand in stark contrast to the apparent impotence and indecisiveness of the $350-billion-a-year US military. Yet for all the shortcomings of the Federal Aviation Authority and the US Air Force that day, no-one was ever fired or reprimanded.
One explanation for this paralysis is that there was, as fate would have it, an air defence exercise going on in US airspace that same day, codenamed Vigilant Guardian. The air traffic controllers were confused by this, thinking the planes disappearing from their screens might be part of the exercise.
Coincidence? No say the 9/11 sceptics. This was exactly the sort of smokescreen operation that anyone wanting to make life easier for the hijackers would launch to paralyse any authorities that might get in the way. When the first evidence came that hijackings were taking place, traffic control officials wasted valuable time wondering whether or not this was part of the Vigilant Guardian exercise. Suck a smokescreen fits well with two types of government-inspired plot postulated by 9/11 sceptics – popularly known as ‘LIHOP’ and ‘MIHOP’.
Operation Gladio was CIA-NATO terrorism in Europe.
‘LIHOP’ – ‘Let It Happen On Purpose’ – holds that since the turn of the new century, radical right-wingers in Washington (the so-called neo-cons) had been keen to get a US military presence in the Middle East oilfields and were also desperate to do something about Al Qaeda, which had been targeting US interests overseas.
When evidence came in of an impending terrorist attack, they decided to ignore it. They intended that it should succeed. It would act at the very least as a ‘wake-up’ call to their apathetic fellow countrymen and at best as an excuse for war. In the much the same way, some historians believe, President Roosevelt knew in advance from broken codes about the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbour in 1941 – but let it happen, at the cost of 2,400 lives, because he wanted an excuse to join World War II.
‘MIHOP” takes a step on from this – ‘Make it Happen On Purpose’. This theory has the same motivation but the active involvement of US agents. Planted in Al Qaeda, they helped organize the plot, or at the very least cleared a path for the hijackers.These agents may even have tried to keep down casualty figures, which some think were suspiciously small in the circumstances.
The plane that hit the Pentagon was seen to swerve at the last minute and hit an area of the building that was largely unoccupied – and which had just been fitted with reinforced external walls and blast-resistant windows.
A crash into the other side would have killed and maimed many thousands instead of just 125.
In New York, too, more than 50,000 inhabitants of the Towers were targeted but just 2,600 killed – not least because of the orderly way in which the buildings collapsed, after most of the occupants had been evacuated. Was this an example of a ‘managed’ atrocity?
According to Le Figaro and French radio, Osama stayed in an American hospital in Dubai just before 9 11.
For most observers, the idea of US involvement in the attacks still strains credulity beyond breaking point. Yet that catalogue of unanswered questions remains troubling.Some are very basic.
How, for example, did the hijackers manage to slip past airport security with weapons?...
How did the passengers make those phone calls?
Another problem here is those very phone calls from the planes. Experts in Henshall and Morgan’s book say it is all but impossible to make a mobile phone call above 8,000 feet – let alone four times that altitude, as the jet passengers are alleged to have done.
So how were these calls on which so much of the 9/11 narrative has been built ever made? Could they possibly have been invented?
The authors write: ‘Few issues cause as much controversy amongst 9/11 sceptics as these, not least because they were cited – by Tony Blair among others – as eyewitness reports and proof positive the official narrative was true.’
Doubts are even raised over the gung-ho story of Flight 93, the fourth plane in the attacks, which passengers apparently seized back from the hijackers, causing it to crash into a field but miss Washington.The legend of the heroic cockpit-storming, launched to cries of ‘Let’s Roll’, was a product of tapes that have never been authenticated or released to anyone other than the victims’ relatives, who were sworn to secrecy.
Henshall and Morgan say the matter could be cleared up if recordings or billing evidence from phone companies were produced but they never have been.This call for transparency is the thrust of their whole argument. It is time, they say, for a full and truly independent inquiry into 9/11 that will reveal all the facts and silence the rumours.
One thing it could consider would be the anthrax attack on America three weeks after 9/11. Five recipients of contaminated letters died, postal facilities were closed, as were office buildings on Capitol Hill where hundreds of lawmakers and staff were tested and given an antibiotic.
At the time, this was seized on by the Washington power-brokers pressing for action against Iraq. ‘Who but Saddam Hussein could have supplied Arab terrorists with anthrax,’ they asked.
By contrast, skeptics about 9/11 see this as this finishing touch to the grand plot – an attempt to distract attention from any doubts about the atrocities and the lessons to be learned from them.They may have a case. The letters mysteriously stopped and the anthrax spores were identified by scientists as a particular strain stemming only from the government’s own labs in Maryland.
But by then the scare had shut down congress at a crucial time, when questions about 9/11 were beginning to surface, and helped deepen the mood of fear and paranoia among ordinary Americans.It was those fears, say the skeptics, that Bush exploited to get his way on Iraq. Had he plotted it that way all along?
Henshall and Morgan raise enough awkward points to make it a thought that cannot simply be laughed out of court.
After all, Bush and Blair, took us to war assuring us that ‘the Iraq regime continues to possess some of the most lethal weapons ever devised’. Yet those weapons of mass destruction have not been found and many doubt they existed.
With public trust one of the major casualties of the war, can any of us be absolutely sure we have not been caught up in a lie and perhaps a bigger one even than we ever though possible?..
Henshall and Morgan ... have certainly left a whiff of something sinister in the air.
9/11 Revealed: Challenging The Facts Behind The War On Terror, by Ian Henshall and Rowland Morgan is published at £8.99.
But now the question is asked: was it all too pat, too neat?
Though 30 years old, the towers had expressly been built to survive the impact of a Boeing 707, a plane the same size and carrying as much fuel as the ones that struck.
That they collapsed after being hit and fell at such speed was unprecedented in the history of architecture.
It astonished many engineers.
The official explanation is known as the Pancake Effect – steel supports melting in the intense fireball, causing the floors to tumble down on each other.
The problem here is that the heat from the explosions was probably not nearly as great as people tend to assume.
There was indeed a lot of kerosene from the aircraft fuel tanks when flight 11 from Boston hit the North Tower between the 94th and the 98th floors but pictures show that most of this fireballed outwards.
Experts have questioned whether the fire ever got hot enough to melt the buildings’ steel frames.
Oddly, too, original estimates by firefighters after the second plane, Flight 175, hit the South Tower, were that the blaze was containable.
Two firefighters actually reached the crash zone on the 78th floor and a tape exists of them radioing down that just two hoses would be enough to get the fire under control – in which case the situation should have been little different from a ‘normal’ office fire, and no steel tower ever collapsed as the result of such a blaze.
‘The fire wasn’t hot enough to cause a collapse’ Kevin R Ryan, laboratory director at a US underwriting firm specializing in product safety, was sacked from his job last year after questioning the official explanation.
“The buildings should have easily withstood the thermal stress caused by the burning jet fuel”, he said. “If steel did soften or melt, this was certainly not due to jet fuel fires of any kind, let alone the briefly burning fires in those towers. That fact should be of great concern to all Americans.”
Intriguingly, Ryan claimed that his firm had checked and approved the steel used in the towers when they were built. This was later vehemently denied by the bosses who sacked him.
To add to the mystery, the tape of the two firemen was kept secret and when relatives were finally allowed to listen to it, they had to sign strict confidentiality agreements.
If the Pancake Effect theory is wrong, there’s one obvious alternative: that the towers were brought down by the sheer impact of the planes hitting them. But this, according to the skeptics, ignores basic physics. The initial hit on the North Tower, for example, destroyed 33 of the 59 columns in its north face. This meant the damage was asymmetrical, so any resulting collapse would surely have been lopsided. In fact, the building fell evenly.
The TV aerial on the summit sank vertically, in a straight line.
There were other strange anomalies. According to the Kean Commission, when the first plane struck: ‘A jet fuel fireball erupted and shot down a bank of elevators, bursting into numerous lower floors, including the lobby level, and the basement four storeys below ground.’ Unlikely, say Henshall and Morgan.
A film by a French documentary crew, who by chance were following a New York firefighting team that day, shows the first men arriving. The lobby was covered in fine debris and the windows were shattered but there was none of the soot or oily residue that burning jet fuel would have left behind.
Meanwhile down in the basement, a 50-ton hydraulic press was reduced to rubble and a steel and concrete fire door demolished. Witnesses there said the destruction was less like that from a fireball flash and more like that from a bomb.
Some firefighters told reporters that day that they thought there had been bombs in the building – before apparently being silenced by their chiefs.
Atta chose to learn to fly at a Venice Florida airfield long used for CIA operations.
So had Al Qaeda cleverly placed explosives inside the towers as well as attacking them from the air? Or, as conspiracy theorists would have it, had some homegrown agency mined the towers to make sure they fell – but neatly without collapsing over the rest of Manhattan, America’s financial and business heartland?
The authors quote an expert demolition contractor from Pennsylvania, Michael Taylor, who said the fall of the buildings ‘looked like a controlled demolition’.
Another expert, Van Romero, vice-president for research at the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, reached the same opinion after studying videos of the disaster, and concluded that ‘explosive devices inside the buildings’ caused them to collapse.
Strangely and without explanation, he recanted that view just ten days after going public with it. Might he possibly have been leaned on?
Even stranger, say Henshall and Morgan, was the collapse of a third building on the World Trade Centre site, a smaller 47-storey block known as WTC7, which was largely ignored by the world’s media.
It had not been hit by a plane yet it, too, mysteriously fell many hours after the Towers had gone. The official explanation for this was that fuel stores caught fire as a result of debris from the burning towers, the building began to bulge in one corner, and after that it was unsalvageable.
But remember that, according to Henshall and Morgan, a steel-framed building had never collapsed as a result of a fire before this day. And, again according to the authors, WTC7 appears almost untouched by fire in photographs taken at the time.
The landlord of the World Trade Centre site, Larry Silverstein, explicitly suggested at one point that WTC7 was deliberately demolished. He told a US TV documentary that a decision was taken to ‘pull’ the building rather than risk loss of life, though this was later denied.
Certainly, according to Henshall and Morgan, the building’s fall in seven seconds was just as textbook-tidy and suspicious as the collapse of the Twin Towers. Given that it also housed offices of the US Secret Service, the CIA and the Defence Department, this has led conspiracy theorists to give it a key role in the supposed 9/11 plot – as we will see shortly.
Part of the whole problem, according to Henshall and Morgan, is that vital evidence about what happened was destroyed or muddied in the wake of the atrocity.
One expert said there were bombs inside the towers.
Ground Zero, the base of the towers, was fiercely protected by the authorities – understandably so because it not only contained human remains but a cache of seized drugs held in an FBI office and more than $1 billion of gold from bank vaults in the Buildings. Yet what went on behind all the heavy security?
After most air disasters, the wreckage of the planes is meticulously gathered up and pieced together in search of clues. Extraordinarily, in the course of removing the rubble from the Twin Towers to a nearby landfill site, the 9/11 salvage operation seems to have ‘lost’ four six-ton aircraft engines, besides failing to find the ‘black box’ flight data recorders and cockpit voice recorders from either of the planes.
These data boxes – which could have revealed exactly what happened in the doomed jets – are deliberately designed to withstand heavy impacts and exceptionally high temperatures. It is, according to experts, very rare for them not to be recovered after an accident.
Unfortunately, according Henshall and Morgan, there was a singular lack of official zeal even to establish the very basic fact that the aircraft that hit the Twin Towers were the same as those that took off from Boston.
Perhaps, with almost the entire world watching the attacks on TV, it hardly seemed necessary to prove the glaringly obvious. But this failure to follow standard procedures for accident investigation once again gave encouragement to the conspiracy theorists.
Atta chose to learn to fly at a Venice Florida airfield long used for CIA operations.
So had Al Qaeda cleverly placed explosives inside the towers as well as attacking them from the air? Or, as conspiracy theorists would have it, had some homegrown agency mined the towers to make sure they fell – but neatly without collapsing over the rest of Manhattan, America’s financial and business heartland?
The authors quote an expert demolition contractor from Pennsylvania, Michael Taylor, who said the fall of the buildings ‘looked like a controlled demolition’.
Another expert, Van Romero, vice-president for research at the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, reached the same opinion after studying videos of the disaster, and concluded that ‘explosive devices inside the buildings’ caused them to collapse.
Strangely and without explanation, he recanted that view just ten days after going public with it. Might he possibly have been leaned on?
Even stranger, say Henshall and Morgan, was the collapse of a third building on the World Trade Centre site, a smaller 47-storey block known as WTC7, which was largely ignored by the world’s media.
It had not been hit by a plane yet it, too, mysteriously fell many hours after the Towers had gone. The official explanation for this was that fuel stores caught fire as a result of debris from the burning towers, the building began to bulge in one corner, and after that it was unsalvageable.
But remember that, according to Henshall and Morgan, a steel-framed building had never collapsed as a result of a fire before this day. And, again according to the authors, WTC7 appears almost untouched by fire in photographs taken at the time.
The landlord of the World Trade Centre site, Larry Silverstein, explicitly suggested at one point that WTC7 was deliberately demolished. He told a US TV documentary that a decision was taken to ‘pull’ the building rather than risk loss of life, though this was later denied.
Certainly, according to Henshall and Morgan, the building’s fall in seven seconds was just as textbook-tidy and suspicious as the collapse of the Twin Towers. Given that it also housed offices of the US Secret Service, the CIA and the Defence Department, this has led conspiracy theorists to give it a key role in the supposed 9/11 plot – as we will see shortly.
Part of the whole problem, according to Henshall and Morgan, is that vital evidence about what happened was destroyed or muddied in the wake of the atrocity.
One expert said there were bombs inside the towers.
Ground Zero, the base of the towers, was fiercely protected by the authorities – understandably so because it not only contained human remains but a cache of seized drugs held in an FBI office and more than $1 billion of gold from bank vaults in the Buildings. Yet what went on behind all the heavy security?
After most air disasters, the wreckage of the planes is meticulously gathered up and pieced together in search of clues. Extraordinarily, in the course of removing the rubble from the Twin Towers to a nearby landfill site, the 9/11 salvage operation seems to have ‘lost’ four six-ton aircraft engines, besides failing to find the ‘black box’ flight data recorders and cockpit voice recorders from either of the planes.
These data boxes – which could have revealed exactly what happened in the doomed jets – are deliberately designed to withstand heavy impacts and exceptionally high temperatures. It is, according to experts, very rare for them not to be recovered after an accident.
Unfortunately, according Henshall and Morgan, there was a singular lack of official zeal even to establish the very basic fact that the aircraft that hit the Twin Towers were the same as those that took off from Boston.
Perhaps, with almost the entire world watching the attacks on TV, it hardly seemed necessary to prove the glaringly obvious. But this failure to follow standard procedures for accident investigation once again gave encouragement to the conspiracy theorists.
And then there was the oddity of the single passport. The black boxes may have been destroyed and steel girders melted – yet somehow one of the hijackers’ passports avoided this inferno and was found intact in a nearby street by ‘a passer-by’.
To Henshall and Morgan, that seems absurd, as does the almost instant identification of this person as a hijacker rather than a passenger or a Twin Towers office worker.
Conspiracy theorists suspect the passport was planted to help establish the official story in the first, critical hours after the disaster.
Why didn't fighter planes intercept the hijackers?
Still more unanswered questions surround what happened at the Pentagon in Washington, in the third successful terrorist attack that day.
After taking off from Dulles Airport, Washington, American Airlines Flight 77 dropped off the radar screens for 36 minutes when its transponders sending signals back to air traffic control were switched off.
When the blip reappeared, it was closing on the city but where precisely the aircraft had been for the past half an hour was a mystery. Nor could anyone in air traffic control figure out what it was.
Experienced officials apparently watched its speed and maneuverability and thought it must be a military plane.
Conspiracy theorists maintain this is precisely what it was.
In a repeat of New York, no evidence has ever been produced from the wreckage to prove that it was Flight 77 that hurtled into the side of the Pentagon at 350mph.
Photographs show that the hole it made was large enough for the fuselage of a Boeing 757 but not for the wings and the tail, though these supposedly disappeared through the gap and then vapourised.
For the conspiracy theorists, this points to a conclusion that what hit was not Flight 77, and not even a jetliner. Some witnesses claim the plane they say hit the Pentagon was a small one, an eight – or 12-seater, and that it did not have the roar of an airliner but the shrill whine of a fighter plane. One witness is convinced it was a missile.
The authors say the matter could be cleared up by CCTV footage of the crash from a nearby filling station, a hotel and traffic surveillance cameras.
There were plenty of Nazis in the USA in the 1930s.
Unfortunately, the FBI seized all three videos within minutes of the crash and they have never been released.
If they were produced, they might lay to rest the theory that what hit the Pentagon was a military drone painted in airline livery and that just before impact it fired a missile to enable a clean entry which would explain the lack of debris. But until they are, the skeptics will continue to have a field day.
In essence, to the extreme conspiracy theorists, what took place on 9/11 was a repeat of the aborted OPERATION NORTHWOODS.
Far from being an attack by Islamic terrorists, they say, the events were a complete hoax, a conjuring trick by the US government in just the same way that Kennedy’s generals wanted to fool the world over Cuba.
Planes were swapped, ‘drones’ slammed into the World Trade Centre (which was mined with explosives as well) and the Pentagon, and the identities of alleged hijackers from the Middle East were stolen or invented to put the blame on Al Qaeda.
Along with the ‘passengers’ who apparently boarded the planes, the ‘suicide hijackers’ are now either dead or living under different identities, just as the pentagon planned fro the military personnel it was going to use back in 1962.
The theory seizes on the fact that, like the plane that apparently hit the Pentagon, both Flight 11 and Flight 175 switched off their transponders on their way to the Twin Towers and disappeared from Radar screens.
According to the skeptics, this gave them time and opportunity to land at the handily located Griffiss Air Force Base, a Pentagon command center which also houses research laboratories into advanced computers and radar.
There, they were supposedly replaced by remote-controlled substitutes.
In technical terms, this is not as far fetched as it sounds.
The US military experimented with unmanned aircraft as far back as World War II and there have been successful jet models since. Well-connected conspirators, so the theory goes, would have little difficulty getting their hands on a system to fit in an airliner. The switch would supposedly be foolproof because, as we have seen, the aircraft in the ruins would not be properly identified.
Then there was the smaller building known as WTC7. It was the obvious point from which to run the New York end of the scam, guiding the planes into their target. Afterwards, of course, the evidence had to be destroyed, hence its demolition...
Bologna 1980 reportedly showed that agents of the CIA and NATO were prepared to kill innocent civilians.
An operation of such intricacy and complexity would require the co-operation – and the silence until death – of thousands of people. Everything we have read about the victims on the planes, and their heartbroken relatives, would be a carefully constructed sham...
Why ... were air traffic controllers so slow to report suspected hijackings to the military that day in breach of standard procedures, with the result that fighter planes arrived too late to intercept?
Flight controllers in four separate incidents were unaccountably slow to realize that something was wrong and alert the military authorities.
Even after one plane was definitely known to have been hijacked, they failed to respond promptly when others went missing. The air force scrambled from the wrong base. For some reason, too, when fighter planes eventually were scrambled to New York, they were from an airbase 150 miles away, rather than the much closer one in New Jersey. The Twin Towers were ablaze before they got there.
All the while the local TV channels were smoothly getting eye-in-the-sky helicopters into the air over the World Trade Centre.
In the words of the authors: “Their routine mobilizations stand in stark contrast to the apparent impotence and indecisiveness of the $350-billion-a-year US military. Yet for all the shortcomings of the Federal Aviation Authority and the US Air Force that day, no-one was ever fired or reprimanded.
One explanation for this paralysis is that there was, as fate would have it, an air defence exercise going on in US airspace that same day, codenamed Vigilant Guardian. The air traffic controllers were confused by this, thinking the planes disappearing from their screens might be part of the exercise.
Coincidence? No say the 9/11 sceptics. This was exactly the sort of smokescreen operation that anyone wanting to make life easier for the hijackers would launch to paralyse any authorities that might get in the way. When the first evidence came that hijackings were taking place, traffic control officials wasted valuable time wondering whether or not this was part of the Vigilant Guardian exercise. Suck a smokescreen fits well with two types of government-inspired plot postulated by 9/11 sceptics – popularly known as ‘LIHOP’ and ‘MIHOP’.
Operation Gladio was CIA-NATO terrorism in Europe.
‘LIHOP’ – ‘Let It Happen On Purpose’ – holds that since the turn of the new century, radical right-wingers in Washington (the so-called neo-cons) had been keen to get a US military presence in the Middle East oilfields and were also desperate to do something about Al Qaeda, which had been targeting US interests overseas.
When evidence came in of an impending terrorist attack, they decided to ignore it. They intended that it should succeed. It would act at the very least as a ‘wake-up’ call to their apathetic fellow countrymen and at best as an excuse for war. In the much the same way, some historians believe, President Roosevelt knew in advance from broken codes about the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbour in 1941 – but let it happen, at the cost of 2,400 lives, because he wanted an excuse to join World War II.
‘MIHOP” takes a step on from this – ‘Make it Happen On Purpose’. This theory has the same motivation but the active involvement of US agents. Planted in Al Qaeda, they helped organize the plot, or at the very least cleared a path for the hijackers.These agents may even have tried to keep down casualty figures, which some think were suspiciously small in the circumstances.
The plane that hit the Pentagon was seen to swerve at the last minute and hit an area of the building that was largely unoccupied – and which had just been fitted with reinforced external walls and blast-resistant windows.
A crash into the other side would have killed and maimed many thousands instead of just 125.
In New York, too, more than 50,000 inhabitants of the Towers were targeted but just 2,600 killed – not least because of the orderly way in which the buildings collapsed, after most of the occupants had been evacuated. Was this an example of a ‘managed’ atrocity?
According to Le Figaro and French radio, Osama stayed in an American hospital in Dubai just before 9 11.
For most observers, the idea of US involvement in the attacks still strains credulity beyond breaking point. Yet that catalogue of unanswered questions remains troubling.Some are very basic.
How, for example, did the hijackers manage to slip past airport security with weapons?...
How did the passengers make those phone calls?
Another problem here is those very phone calls from the planes. Experts in Henshall and Morgan’s book say it is all but impossible to make a mobile phone call above 8,000 feet – let alone four times that altitude, as the jet passengers are alleged to have done.
So how were these calls on which so much of the 9/11 narrative has been built ever made? Could they possibly have been invented?
The authors write: ‘Few issues cause as much controversy amongst 9/11 sceptics as these, not least because they were cited – by Tony Blair among others – as eyewitness reports and proof positive the official narrative was true.’
Doubts are even raised over the gung-ho story of Flight 93, the fourth plane in the attacks, which passengers apparently seized back from the hijackers, causing it to crash into a field but miss Washington.The legend of the heroic cockpit-storming, launched to cries of ‘Let’s Roll’, was a product of tapes that have never been authenticated or released to anyone other than the victims’ relatives, who were sworn to secrecy.
Henshall and Morgan say the matter could be cleared up if recordings or billing evidence from phone companies were produced but they never have been.This call for transparency is the thrust of their whole argument. It is time, they say, for a full and truly independent inquiry into 9/11 that will reveal all the facts and silence the rumours.
One thing it could consider would be the anthrax attack on America three weeks after 9/11. Five recipients of contaminated letters died, postal facilities were closed, as were office buildings on Capitol Hill where hundreds of lawmakers and staff were tested and given an antibiotic.
At the time, this was seized on by the Washington power-brokers pressing for action against Iraq. ‘Who but Saddam Hussein could have supplied Arab terrorists with anthrax,’ they asked.
By contrast, skeptics about 9/11 see this as this finishing touch to the grand plot – an attempt to distract attention from any doubts about the atrocities and the lessons to be learned from them.They may have a case. The letters mysteriously stopped and the anthrax spores were identified by scientists as a particular strain stemming only from the government’s own labs in Maryland.
But by then the scare had shut down congress at a crucial time, when questions about 9/11 were beginning to surface, and helped deepen the mood of fear and paranoia among ordinary Americans.It was those fears, say the skeptics, that Bush exploited to get his way on Iraq. Had he plotted it that way all along?
Henshall and Morgan raise enough awkward points to make it a thought that cannot simply be laughed out of court.
After all, Bush and Blair, took us to war assuring us that ‘the Iraq regime continues to possess some of the most lethal weapons ever devised’. Yet those weapons of mass destruction have not been found and many doubt they existed.
With public trust one of the major casualties of the war, can any of us be absolutely sure we have not been caught up in a lie and perhaps a bigger one even than we ever though possible?..
Henshall and Morgan ... have certainly left a whiff of something sinister in the air.
9/11 Revealed: Challenging The Facts Behind The War On Terror, by Ian Henshall and Rowland Morgan is published at £8.99.
Tuesday, 5 September 2017
MYSTERIOUS ESTHER RANTZEN
Dame Esther Rantzen (the daughter of Flora Leverson) and her friend Sir Jimmy Savile, who reportedly supplied children to the elite while being close friends with Israel.
Anonymous asks: "The Coleman Experience blog was shut down at the behest of Esther Rantzen?"
Some months ago, the BBC's Esther Rantzen attacked Google for refusing to remove statements calling her a child abuser and a child killer.
According to The Sun newspaper: Esther Rantzen slammed Google - 8th January 2017
"An anonymous website branded her a satanic child abuser who had buried dead babies in her garden, held drug-fuelled sex parties and covered up attacks on kids by celebs like Jimmy Savile.
"Google acted on her plea to cut the link only after she decided to expose their initial refusal in the national press."
Hitler performed a sex act in a cinema as he watched a violent film .
Some months ago, the BBC's Esther Rantzen attacked Google for refusing to remove statements calling her a child abuser and a child killer.
According to The Sun newspaper: Esther Rantzen slammed Google - 8th January 2017
"An anonymous website branded her a satanic child abuser who had buried dead babies in her garden, held drug-fuelled sex parties and covered up attacks on kids by celebs like Jimmy Savile.
"Google acted on her plea to cut the link only after she decided to expose their initial refusal in the national press."
Jimmy Savile allegations: Esther Rantzen's response defies belief ...
www.telegraph.co.uk
Oct 5, 2012 - How could Esther Rantzen, the founder of ChildLine, possibly ignore 'green room gossip' about Jimmy Savile's alleged abuse of young girls, asks Katy Brand, in her first Paper Tiger weekly column.Abuse campaigner: I told Esther Rantzen about paedo Jimmy Savile ...
https://www.thesun.co.uk/.../abuse-campaigner-i-told-esther-rantzen-about-paedo-jim...
Oct 12, 2012 - ESTHER Rantzen faces claims that she failed to act on Jimmy Savile paedophile rumours. Abuse campaigner Shy Keenan says she alerted ...Revealed: The BBC stars who knew about pervert Jimmy Savile's ...
https://www.thesun.co.uk/.../revealed-the-bbc-stars-who-knew-about-pervert-jimmy-s...
Feb 25, 2016 - Revealed: The BBC stars who knew about pervert Jimmy Savile's crimes ... Sir Terry Wogan, Esther Rantzen and Louis Theroux are named ...BBC'S ESTHER RANTZEN LINKED TO ELM GUEST HOUSE
aanirfan.blogspot.com/2014/07/bbcs-esther-rantzen-linked-to-elm-guest.html
Jul 20, 2014 - Esther Rantzen has worked for a certain 'child protection' charity which is linked to child abuser Sir Jimmy Savile and to Peter Mandelson.Ken Clarke, Esther Rantzen, Kray twins, Jewish Underground.
aangirfan.blogspot.com/2012/10/ken-clarke-esther-rantzen-kray-twins.html
Oct 22, 2012 - The Krays reportedly supplied boys to the elite. "Russell Marson was a hairdresser and part time gay prostitute; he ran up a bill with the Krays ...WE COLLUDED WITH 'CHILD ABUSER'.
aangirfan.blogspot.com/2012/09/we-colluded-with-child-abuser.html
Oct 1, 2012 - Esther Rantzen: We colluded with Jimmy Saville as a child abuser ... Rantzen told The Mail on Sunday: "I feel that we in television, in his world, ...
~~~
Monday, 4 September 2017
JFK, MURDERS, FREDDY MILLS, KRAY TWINS, FREEMASONS, PROFUMO, DOLPHIN SQUARE, BBC, FREUD, ROTHSCHILD
World champion boxer Freddie Mills at Talbot Boys Home, Talbot Village, c 1948. Mills was a close friend of Ronnie Kray, who supplied boys to the elite.
Freemason John du Rose.
Freddie Mills, light-heavyweight champion of the world, "confessed to a fellow freemason, Chief Superintendent John du Rose, that he was 'Jack the Stripper'".
dailymail / The Secret Life of Freddie Mills by Michael Litchfield
In July 1965, Freddie Mills, was found shot dead in the back of his car in Soho in London.
Freddy Mills was a Freemason and a close friend of the gangster Ronnie Kray, who supplied young boys to the elite.
Boxing hero Freddie Mills.
The Kray Twins are said to be linked to the death of Freddy Mills.
Frances Brown, aka Margaret McGowan.
Two of the Jack the Stripper victims, Hannah Tailford and Frances Brown, were said to be involved in the Profumo Affair of 1963.
Jack the Stripper
Frances Brown gave evidence at the trial of Stephen Ward who supplied girls to UK government minister Jack Profumo and President John F Kennedy.
The Nude Murders
The gay spy Anthony Blunt carried out the 'clean-up' operation after Ward’s arrest.
Wimpole Muse: Chapter 2 - Dolphin Square
Hanah Tailford. Hannah Tailford, was found by the River Thames at Hammersmith in February 1964.
Hannah Tailford was a visitor to parties at London's Dolphin Square, where the security services apparently supplied girls and boys to the elite.
Wimpole Muse: Chapter 2 - Dolphin Square .
The Profumo-Ward Affair is linked to the murder of President John F Kennedy.
Freddie Mills (right), light-heavyweight champion of the world in 1948, with actor Sid James.
...
Freddy Mill's alleged gay lover Michael Holiday died mysteriously in 1963.
"Mills had been unable to cope following the 'suicide' of his close friend Michael Holliday, a popular cabaret singer.
"Mills was rumoured to have had an affair with Holliday, who was also connected to Ronnie Kray."
Boxing hero Freddie Mills.
Freddy Mills.
In the early 1960s, various prostitutes told the police that "Mills had behaved violently at a sado-masochistic orgy he held at a friend's luxury apartment."
dailymail
A policeman and a group of boys near the spot on the Thames towpath where the body of murder victim Gwynneth Rees was discovered, November 1963.
According to Ronnie Kray's wife Kate: 'Ronnie and Freddie were very good friends. So much so that a lot of people believed they were lovers.'
One of the most famous female spies was Mariella Novotny, who was reportedly Jewish. (aangirfan: DOUBLE AGENTS) Novotny was involved with J F Kennedy. Novotny was reportedly supplied to Kennedy by Dr Stephen Ward.
Matthew Freud is married to Elisabeth Murdoch, daughter of Rupert Murdoch.
Clement Freud helped the parents of missing child Madeleine McCann by cooking them dinners in Praia da Luz (aangirfan: FREUD, MADELEINE McCANN, MURDOCH)
Emma Freud recommended the 'bed-hopping bisexual' Millie Dobie to former UK prime minister Gordon Brown (aangirfan: GORDON BROWN AND HIS TRAINER)
According to this source - Archives - the Krays had links to a paedophile ring.
"The paedophile ring in question had links to the Kray twins."
More information is found here - Archives
"The police, led by top-cops Joe Simpson and Shirley Becke, used tosupply Profs Emanuel Miller and Richard Asher with the drugs they wanted to study, and used me as a guinea-pig!
"There would be several off-duty coppers present to see the result and work out how to deal with an acid-head."
Boothby's close pal Tom Driberg MP, who was a rent-boy loving spook with links to Russia and hence Israel.
Driberg's very close friend Harold Wilson, whose chief friends were businessmen with links to Israel.
Jewish businessman Harold Kissin.
Influential Jewish lawyer Arnold Goodman.
The 'Jewish Establishment' apparently wanted to protect Driberg, among others.
They bred 'spares' for this, especially amongst the poor...
When radio and film and tv came along, the spares who showed a talent (and not a few who didn't, but had the right 'look') were sponsored to succeed.
I saw this with my own eyes in 50's-60's showbiz. It was more rife in American circles, probably because the big money there...
I know of one Brit pop-star who was a spare, knew him as a kid back home...
I knew Brian Epstein in '61-'62, in London, and met 2 other pop-stars (to-be) one who 'virtually' admitted to me he was a spare...
The other was more reticent but didn't say 'no'...
He was murdered later on...
Ask yourself this, if there was a major crisis, a REAL one, who would you rather listen to, a politician or a pop-star...
That's when the spare earns his money....
In the book 'The Fifth Man', Roland Perry puts the case that Ted Rothschild was a major spy for Russia and Israel.
Driberg went as a day-boy to a local school called the Grange. It was here at the age of eleven where he began sexual experimentation with other boys...
In the autumn of 1935 he gave two unemployed miners a place with him in his bed, but when his hands began to wander the men went to report him at the local police station.
On 12th. November 1935 Tom Driberg ended up in court at the Old Bailey on a charge of indecent assault, but he was found not guilty.
His boss, Lord Beaverbrook (Max Aitken), ensured that there was no press coverage, although Tom Driberg had to go to see the editor of The News of the World.
There may have been some reciprocal arrangement as Lady Astor had pleaded with Lord Beaverbrook to keep the homosexual charges against her son Bobbie Shaw out of the papers...
Tom Driberg was chair of the Labour Party in 1957-58.
In 1965 he was appointed as a Privy Counsellor.
He had been an MP for thirty years when he retired in February 1974.
In 1975 he was made a life peer and became Lord Bradwell.
aangirfan: JIMMY SAVILE, THE KRAY TWINS, CLIFF RICHARD...
aangirfan: JIMMY SAVILE; ROTHSCHILD; ANTHONY BLUNT; MI5
aangirfan: JIMMY SAVILE - USA AND EUROPE - DUTROUX ...
aangirfan: MONARCH, JFK, JIMMY SAVILE, BARNARDOS
aangirfan: SPOOKS, BOYS AND POLITICIANS
aangirfan: OUR KIND OF TRAITOR
aangirfan: THE KRAY TWINS, BOYS, TOP PEOPLE, SEX IN PRISONS
aangirfan: Kray Twins
Freddy Mills presented the BBC music show Six-Five Special.
...
Freddy Mill's alleged gay lover Michael Holiday died mysteriously in 1963.
"Mills had been unable to cope following the 'suicide' of his close friend Michael Holliday, a popular cabaret singer.
"Mills was rumoured to have had an affair with Holliday, who was also connected to Ronnie Kray."
Boxing hero Freddie Mills.
Freddy Mills.
In the early 1960s, various prostitutes told the police that "Mills had behaved violently at a sado-masochistic orgy he held at a friend's luxury apartment."
dailymail
A policeman and a group of boys near the spot on the Thames towpath where the body of murder victim Gwynneth Rees was discovered, November 1963.
According to Ronnie Kray's wife Kate: 'Ronnie and Freddie were very good friends. So much so that a lot of people believed they were lovers.'
One of the most famous female spies was Mariella Novotny, who was reportedly Jewish. (aangirfan: DOUBLE AGENTS) Novotny was involved with J F Kennedy. Novotny was reportedly supplied to Kennedy by Dr Stephen Ward.
In London, "when the Jewish gangsters the Kray twins took over Rachmans (slum property) empire it was claimed to be with Mossad approval."
Polish Jew slum landlord Peter Rachman and his girlfriend Mandy Rice-Davies "were both Mossad informants."
Mandy Rice-Davies worked for "the CIA spy, osteopath occultist and procurer of young women Stephen Ward."
Stephen Ward was reported to have 'committed suicide'.
Stephen Ward society osteopath and healer was said to have been part of the CIA monarch MK ultra mind control programme.
"Stephen Ward was known to have treated the royal family and particularly Winston Churchill for his crippling alcoholic and depressive fits, and got him painting for relaxation.
"It was rumoured by Sir Anthony Blunt that Ward was killed for what he knew of this.
"In 1962 a high ranking (Soviet) defector named Yuri Krotkov... defected to the west with reams of info...
"In 1962 a high ranking (Soviet) defector named Yuri Krotkov... defected to the west with reams of info...
"All the above people were mentioned along with several people in government, the trade unions, show business and one in the church all assisting ... plans to destroy the British identity.
"Most interesting was that this info was ending up in Israel in the original format..."
- T Stokes London
Boy by Lucian Freud.
On 20 July 2011, Artist Lucian Freud, died of a 'mystery' illness, aged 88.
Lucian Freud was the brother of Clement Freud and uncle of Matthew Freud and Emma Freud.
On 20 July 2011, Artist Lucian Freud, died of a 'mystery' illness, aged 88.
Lucian Freud was the brother of Clement Freud and uncle of Matthew Freud and Emma Freud.
Lucian Freud
Matthew Freud is married to Elisabeth Murdoch, daughter of Rupert Murdoch.
Clement Freud helped the parents of missing child Madeleine McCann by cooking them dinners in Praia da Luz (aangirfan: FREUD, MADELEINE McCANN, MURDOCH)
Emma Freud recommended the 'bed-hopping bisexual' Millie Dobie to former UK prime minister Gordon Brown (aangirfan: GORDON BROWN AND HIS TRAINER)
Boy by Lucian Freud
Lucian Freud ran up half a million pounds in gambling debts with the gangster Kray twins, who reportedly ran a child abuse ring for top people.
Lucian Freud liked to paint a certain type of boy.
Judy Garland and the UK's Kray Twins (Another Nickel In The Machine - 2). Judy Garland was said to be a victim of brain washing by the spooks.
The spooks and the police protect child abuse rings?
Sir Joseph Simpson (1909 – 1968) was the head of the London Metropolitan Police, from 1958 to 1968.
Simpson apparently turned a blind eye to the crimes of the major London gangsters known as the Kray Twins.
(http://www.personenencyclopedie.info...bertjohngraham)
"Even when they turned to murder, there was no attempt to catch them." (Cached)
Some very powerful and spooky people were at work.
The spooks and the police protect child abuse rings?
Sir Joseph Simpson (1909 – 1968) was the head of the London Metropolitan Police, from 1958 to 1968.
Simpson apparently turned a blind eye to the crimes of the major London gangsters known as the Kray Twins.
(http://www.personenencyclopedie.info...bertjohngraham)
"Even when they turned to murder, there was no attempt to catch them." (Cached)
Some very powerful and spooky people were at work.
Christine Keeler and the Kray Twins. The Christine Keeler-Profumo scandal helped Harold Wilson, friend of Israel, to become UK prime minister.
nickelinthemachine.com//gay/page/2/
The Krays reportedly ran a child abuse ring linked to top people.
The Krays liked boys and so did a lot of the top people.
The Krays were Jewish and gay.
nickelinthemachine.com//gay/page/2/
The Krays reportedly ran a child abuse ring linked to top people.
The Krays liked boys and so did a lot of the top people.
The Krays were Jewish and gay.
George Raft and the Kray Twins (http://www.nickelinthemachine.com/tag/gay/page/2/
Among the characters in this saga were:
Lord Boothby, who was very close to Winston Churchill, and who liked masochistic sex with rent boys.
Boothby's close pal Tom Driberg MP, who was a rent-boy loving spook with links to Russia and hence Israel.
(Notorious : The Immortal Legend Of The Kray Twins, by John Pearson /Sex, lies, Downing Street and the cover-up that left the Krays ...)
Among the characters in this saga were:
Lord Boothby, who was very close to Winston Churchill, and who liked masochistic sex with rent boys.
Boothby's close pal Tom Driberg MP, who was a rent-boy loving spook with links to Russia and hence Israel.
(Notorious : The Immortal Legend Of The Kray Twins, by John Pearson /Sex, lies, Downing Street and the cover-up that left the Krays ...)
"What was involved was the systematic abuse of ten-to-twelve-year-old boys, one of whom subsequentlybecame fairly well known as a singer.
"Another, rather less fortunate,wound up in six pieces in two suitcases...
More information is found here - Archives
Brad Lane with Reggie Kray at Gartree prison. (Yorkshire Post)
"The police uncovered a large-scale juvenile pimping operation centred on a house in a Suffolk village (Tattington) owned by Ronnie Kray.
(the twins had huge property interests in EastAnglia).
"Some of the boys were obtained via a close friend of Britten's in London, who named him as one of the beneficiaries of the 'service': other'customers' included Lord Boothby (who frequently shared boys with Ronnie Kray himself) and the record producer Joe Meek.
"At least two other people died in the aftermath of Bernard's murder as the twins sealed up the leaks."
"The police uncovered a large-scale juvenile pimping operation centred on a house in a Suffolk village (Tattington) owned by Ronnie Kray.
(the twins had huge property interests in EastAnglia).
"Some of the boys were obtained via a close friend of Britten's in London, who named him as one of the beneficiaries of the 'service': other'customers' included Lord Boothby (who frequently shared boys with Ronnie Kray himself) and the record producer Joe Meek.
"At least two other people died in the aftermath of Bernard's murder as the twins sealed up the leaks."
Boy by Lucian Freud.
The spooks and the police protect child abuse rings?
The UK's spooky Tavistock Institute 'researches mind control'(Cached) and the Tavistock strategy 'includes the use of drugs'.(Cached)
Here is part of a Comment on the post "DID SOMETHING GO WRONG IN THE 1960s?"
"I used to model for Harley Street specialists... starting in 1958 as a 12 year-old.
"The police, led by top-cops Joe Simpson and Shirley Becke, used tosupply Profs Emanuel Miller and Richard Asher with the drugs they wanted to study, and used me as a guinea-pig!
"There would be several off-duty coppers present to see the result and work out how to deal with an acid-head."
Anon comments on the link between brainwashing and the following lyrics: 'let me take you DOWN (Negative trigger) cos you're going to, (instruction) strawberry fields (fantasy) NOTHING IS REAL. (disasociation)
Joseph Simpson supplied the drugs?
Sir Joseph Simpson (1909 – 1968) was the head of the London Metropolitan Police, from 1958 to 1968.
Simpson apparently turned a blind eye to the crimes of the major London gangsters known as the Kray Twins.
"Even when they turned to murder, there was no attempt to catch them."
(Cached)
Some very powerful and spooky people were at work.
Christine Keeler and the Kray Twins The Christine Keeler-Profumo scandal helped Harold Wilson, friend of Israel, to become UK prime minister.
The Krays reportedly ran a child abuse ring linked to top people.
The Krays liked boys and so did a lot of the top people.
The Krays were Jewish and gay.
Among the characters in this saga were:
Lord Boothby, who was very close to Winston Churchill, and who liked masochistic sex with rent boys.
Boothby's close pal Tom Driberg MP, who was a rent-boy loving spook with links to Russia and hence Israel.
Driberg's very close friend Harold Wilson, whose chief friends were businessmen with links to Israel.
Jewish businessman Harold Kissin.
Influential Jewish lawyer Arnold Goodman.
The 'Jewish Establishment' apparently wanted to protect Driberg, among others.
(Notorious : The Immortal Legend Of The Kray Twins, by John Pearson /Sex, lies, Downing Street and the cover-up that left the Krays ...)
George Raft and the Kray Twins (http://www.nickelinthemachine.com/tag/gay/page/2/)
Anonymous left the following comment on the post "MICK JAGGER AND THE SPOOKS":
The spooks see to it they have people in all places, areas, influences, races, creeds...
They bred 'spares' for this, especially amongst the poor...
When radio and film and tv came along, the spares who showed a talent (and not a few who didn't, but had the right 'look') were sponsored to succeed.
I saw this with my own eyes in 50's-60's showbiz. It was more rife in American circles, probably because the big money there...
I know of one Brit pop-star who was a spare, knew him as a kid back home...
I knew Brian Epstein in '61-'62, in London, and met 2 other pop-stars (to-be) one who 'virtually' admitted to me he was a spare...
The other was more reticent but didn't say 'no'...
He was murdered later on...
Ask yourself this, if there was a major crisis, a REAL one, who would you rather listen to, a politician or a pop-star...
That's when the spare earns his money....
The spooky Tom Driberg (left) with the Russian spy Guy Burgess, friend of Lord Ted Rothschild. (BRITAIN RUN BY AGENTS OF FOREIGN POWERS?)
Tom Driberg was the "Labour MP with a penchant for cottaging, rent boys and spying (on his own party for MI5), who managed to escape exposure on all counts.
"The policemen used to escort him from the loos of the Albert Embankment if there was an important vote going on in Parliament." (The Pink Paper, 7th. November, 1997, issue 506, page 15.)
Driberg has links to Aleister Crowley.
In Tom Driberg, His Life and Indiscretions, Francis Wheen asks a question about Driberg:
"Can the man who in the 1920s was anointed by Aleister Crowley to succeed him as the Great Beast be the man who in the 1960s tried to persuade Mick Jagger to become a Labour MP?"
Wheen refers to a lunch with Crowley at the Eiffel Tower restaurant; this was when Driberg became Crowley's heir.
Website for this image / ALEISTER CROWLEY / Michael Jackson and CIA Mind Control / ROALD DAHL, SATANISM AND MI6/FASCISTS, SPIES AND BOY SCOUTS
The largely Jewish-run KGB infiltrated the British secret service, but it was often difficult to tell who were the double agents.
Maxwell Knight recruited Driberg as an agent for MI5.
In 1941 the communist Anthony Blunt arranged for Driberg to be expelled from the Communist Party.
In 1940 Lord Ted Rothschild (above) suggested that communist Anthony Blunt should be invited to join the UK secret service.
He also rented a house to his communist friend Guy Burgess. Rothschild worked with communist Kim Philby at the MI6 offices established at the Rothschild family mansion in Paris.
Whose side was Driberg on?
"His was a glorious indulgent life that included a highly public wedding in 1951 just a few years after he had concluded an extravagant series of affairs with soldiers, sailors and airmen."
How did Driberg get away with it?
"By far the best story (and one which may even be true) has him fellating Labour party icon Nye Bevan after a bibulous lunch...
"Although Driberg avoided any public scandal during his lifetime, it appears that the Kremlin was able to blackmail him into becoming a KGB agent – codename Lepage – after one blowjob too many in Moscow.
Driberg has links to Moscow and hence to Israel.
Driberg was a close friend of Guy Burgess and visited Moscow with him.
He was a supporter of Stalin and throughout his time in the Commons and later the Lords there were persistent rumours that he was a Soviet agent.
It is claimed it was during one visit to Moscow that the KGB used his habit of picking up men in public lavatories - known as cottaging - to trap him.
Allegedly he attempted to seduce a KGB man in the urinals behind the Metropole Hotel.
Driberg liked boys.
Driberg went as a day-boy to a local school called the Grange. It was here at the age of eleven where he began sexual experimentation with other boys...
In the autumn of 1935 he gave two unemployed miners a place with him in his bed, but when his hands began to wander the men went to report him at the local police station.
On 12th. November 1935 Tom Driberg ended up in court at the Old Bailey on a charge of indecent assault, but he was found not guilty.
His boss, Lord Beaverbrook (Max Aitken), ensured that there was no press coverage, although Tom Driberg had to go to see the editor of The News of the World.
There may have been some reciprocal arrangement as Lady Astor had pleaded with Lord Beaverbrook to keep the homosexual charges against her son Bobbie Shaw out of the papers...
Christine Keeler, who attended some of Lord Astor's sexy parties at Cliveden. Keeler was the lover of a Russian spy and Jack Profumo, the UK Secretary of State for War. (THE CLASSIC SEX SCANDAL) Website for this image
Driberg had a lucky escape when caught with a Norwegian sailor in an air raid shelter in Edinburgh. Fortunately the policeman was an avid reader of the William Hickey column and let him off. In fact the policeman and Tom Driberg became friends and exchanged letters...
In 1949 the Labour Party conference elected him to the National Executive Committee, and he was re-elected every year from 1950 to 1972...
Tom Driberg was chair of the Labour Party in 1957-58.
In 1965 he was appointed as a Privy Counsellor.
He had been an MP for thirty years when he retired in February 1974.
In 1975 he was made a life peer and became Lord Bradwell.
aangirfan: JIMMY SAVILE; ROTHSCHILD; ANTHONY BLUNT; MI5
aangirfan: JIMMY SAVILE - USA AND EUROPE - DUTROUX ...
aangirfan: MONARCH, JFK, JIMMY SAVILE, BARNARDOS
aangirfan: SPOOKS, BOYS AND POLITICIANS
aangirfan: OUR KIND OF TRAITOR
aangirfan: THE KRAY TWINS, BOYS, TOP PEOPLE, SEX IN PRISONS
aangirfan: Kray Twins
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)