tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9003998945645458544.post3231057750517901247..comments2024-03-28T04:13:00.983-07:00Comments on Aangirfan: STAR SIGNS; TRUMP; DUTROUX; THE DARK SIDEAnonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16577270335071593954noreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9003998945645458544.post-55054176192252626322016-04-09T17:09:26.360-07:002016-04-09T17:09:26.360-07:00vedic astrology is the true form- the rest is a mi...vedic astrology is the true form- the rest is a misdirection-Greg Pearsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05425607285242249242noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9003998945645458544.post-73152115490321944722016-03-31T06:27:57.884-07:002016-03-31T06:27:57.884-07:00Thanks Aang xThanks Aang xAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9003998945645458544.post-5318035025099175052016-03-31T01:34:47.155-07:002016-03-31T01:34:47.155-07:00Anonymous 30 March 2016 at 04:45
Some good insig...Anonymous 30 March 2016 at 04:45 <br /><br />Some good insights above re Jesus, Jung, the dark side etc..<br /><br />John Sanford was a trained Jungian analyst as well as a priest.<br /><br />He admired Jung but disagreed with him fundamentally about what the dark, unconscious side of human nature actually is. <br /><br />He touches on this in 'The Kingdom Within' and goes into it in more detail in 'Evil, the Shadow Side of Reality'. <br /><br />Sanford maintained that Jung was inconsistent in his thinking about good and evil - in 'Answer to Job', for example, he confuses the words 'light' and 'dark' with 'good' and 'evil'.<br /><br />Sanford's own position was that, in the image of totality that the Self represents, there is light and there is dark but dark is not intrinsically evil. <br /><br />Apparently he agreed with Kunkel that evil does not come from the Self, as Jung inferred but from the ego gone badly wrong - the egocentric ego. Anonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16577270335071593954noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9003998945645458544.post-1865226447944235112016-03-28T07:43:08.533-07:002016-03-28T07:43:08.533-07:00Ah, It IS, it really is. But here's the rub, ...Ah, It IS, it really is. But here's the rub, the black hat lubavitchers want you to think exactly this way so that you will once again despise all jews so that so much hate, after you find out that 'the jews' were responsible for 911, and all the rest, you will cry for their blood. The same con successfully pulled off in WWII. But, we know it is not all jews, but this is what they are pushing for to help garner enough attention to institute global hegemony w Israel as it's head. <br /><br />AkhaldanSolo Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9003998945645458544.post-6082548555952830822016-03-27T01:45:34.215-07:002016-03-27T01:45:34.215-07:00Let's simplify this for everyone. It's Jew...Let's simplify this for everyone. It's Jews.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9003998945645458544.post-73251314496375623532016-03-27T01:41:16.692-07:002016-03-27T01:41:16.692-07:00I'm not adverse to trying to find if there'...I'm not adverse to trying to find if there's anything behind birth-day significance? That there's, something, in it? I'm content to get in a not-disruptive puzzle about it. Knowing firmly, why I don't believe but – there's uncanny oddities that make me wonder? Yet, isn't it by very nature – all or nout? I tend to think there's another explanation. One not read so far. Pressing the buzzer on 'all pro or all-cons'? I'd go, "the later is true" but, I'm more for – not pro but not 'no'. Future not yet – and only partly settled by God – is a foundation. Therefore God not so making us, this or that. But could God, sometimes(?)tweek when we're born and in someways(?)how we'll be, in gestation and then..? I'm stuck any further why? God doing, or does God... when we're born and for..? <br /><br />And here's an adjunct. Why is it some people have a propensity to not only question mainstream 'news' but more importantly, fight to expose in overcoming for a better world… see the troubles ahead but push for survival etc etc? Why some and some, is it only socially constructed with compatible dna-mix? Are we decipherable in categories? And is Donald trumped from the off?Mark Jesushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06639581686167038111noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9003998945645458544.post-11265924625364648912016-03-27T01:07:25.042-07:002016-03-27T01:07:25.042-07:00https://twitter.com/charlesfrith/status/6668713494...https://twitter.com/charlesfrith/status/666871349474791424/photo/1Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9003998945645458544.post-85366553425938077192016-03-26T16:45:23.197-07:002016-03-26T16:45:23.197-07:00Astrology ignores the precession of the equinoxes,...Astrology ignores the precession of the equinoxes, hence, it is flawed.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9003998945645458544.post-74113850339898072902016-03-26T16:27:15.926-07:002016-03-26T16:27:15.926-07:00Very interesting. Hope your post doesn't get ...Very interesting. Hope your post doesn't get overtaken by comments that have nothing to do with what you're trying to achieve xAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9003998945645458544.post-3331305512218133232016-03-26T15:01:34.694-07:002016-03-26T15:01:34.694-07:00http://www.globalresearch.ca/brussels-terror-attac...http://www.globalresearch.ca/brussels-terror-attacks-masterminds-fake-cctv-footage-eu-funded-terror-drills-prior-knowledge/5516703Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com